Anonymous ID: d675e8 May 20, 2018, 11:06 a.m. No.1482373   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"So now that Russia hasn't worked, they are moving on to every other country on the planet?"

-@TracyBeanz RT @kylegriffin1:

 

"WSJ confirms Mueller's probe is looking more closely into Middle Eastern involvement during Trump's campaign; it's now exploring the role of an Israeli entrepreneur with ties to the UAE, according to people familiar with the matter."

 

This got me thinking about how ridiculous this investigation has become.

 

Long story-short: The whole thing is obviously a malicious legal action taken against POTUS, because IT ALL is "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree." Then I though how can this be allowed?

 

So I began to think about "Malicious Prosecution."

 

I came to the conclusion that Mueller may be acting as a White Hat, pursuing this until the very end, so that when he is exonerated POTUS could invoke 42 U.S.C 1983 & 1985, and other applicable statutes against those conducting the Witch Hunt, or more precisely, those who initiated it.

Prosecutors and police are generally immune from the above statutes and claims of Malicious Prosecution, except under certain circumstances.

 

But do you know who isn't immune?: The person(s) who set foot on the investigation "under color of law."

 

Who paid for the dossier that kicked this whole thing off? It was essentially HILLARY CLINTON. She may very well be in the cross-hairs of this investigation, not Donald Trump.

 

I have wonder for a while if POTUS' use of the term "witch hunt" was not about himself, but rather an allusion to the fact that Patriots, under his watch, are, in fact, "hunting down" Hillary.

Anonymous ID: d675e8 May 20, 2018, 11:11 a.m. No.1482454   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Is Mueller expanding the whole thing out to every conceivable end in order to box HRC in for initiating a malicious investigation against the President? Is she the one in the cross hairs. Is the "witch hunt" really patriots hunting her down with pitchforks?