>>14825379
>>14825436
>>14825454
TEXT BELOW THE VIDEO INCLUDING THE PDF - IF TOO LONG WILL BE IN THE NEXT POST
Targeted Individuals, the same tactics that Freemason Gang Stalkers use to gaslight us and stop others from believing us are also utilized on a larger scale for gaslighting the masses and censoring all forbidden and suppressed truths and for cover-ups.
After hearing about a mysterious document by an unknown author online—which apparently is very rare—I finally found it. It looks like the Freemasons have frantically removed 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘋𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 from every single corner of the web. The Masons have even 404ed entire websites just because a copy of 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘋𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 was on it!
After a great deal of diligent searching, I finally found it pasted into a Facebook post, lost and hidden and obscured there since way back in October of 2013
What is it about this brief document that they're so afraid of? After reading it, it was clear. Knowing that this information is so dangerous to their system of covert control, I have decided to make this video based on the text. The entire document text won't fit in the video description, so I've included links to the Facebook post and the PDF file I created from it. Please download and spread the PDF while we still can!
-
Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it, especially if you are a public figure or lodge official. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
-
Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues, which can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.
-
Create rumormongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.
-
Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
-
Sidetrack opponents with name-calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kook”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorist”, “conspiracy theorist”, “radical”, “militia member”, “bigot”, “racist”, “religious fanatic”, “crazy person”, “slanderer”, “sexual deviant”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
-
Hit and run. In any public forum, make a brief attack on your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in online and letters-to-the-editor environments, where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning—simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
-
Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
-
Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority, and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing any sources.
-
Play dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
(These are only 9 of the 25 tactics presented in the video)
Please spread this while we still can!
𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘋𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 (Downloadable PDF)
https://mega.nz/file/4NgwCbYK#xuS4BaH…
Alternate PDF link
https://www.scribd.com/document/52559…
=