CEO based in Wuhan
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wuhan-linked-patrick-orlando-man-212753165.html
also TRUTH means PRAVDA
HODL
I mean I get why anons are excited. I was too for a minute. Then I remembered I don't do social media and don't do much digitally except the chans.
Yea, competition is good. But really, that kind of shit is for normies/masses and will eventually become some type of honeypot. It's not like the NSA is going away.
Where exactly is America winning u tard?
Red text means you're right.
Btw, the stock market is gonna crash to fair value. -80% That's gonna be part of the Awakening.
I like that one. Gonna stealies.
Gettr is shorthand for Lock Her Up
Only when I want to be
Wrong. Renamed Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM)
They've done that all over the world, sometimes even when the bases being joined are fairly far apart. I suppose it's for efficiency, but from what I've seen, the bases each keep their previous services and amenities operating.
Until 10 days, I'm laying off the pipe
JC wasn't gonna win reelection regardless though. They may have done that to give Reagan an early win, but it wasn't to affect the election. Carter was very unpopular.
>>14832126 me
The other thing forgotten is how Clinton's quiet handover of the Panama Canal was agreed upon during the Carter administration, despite Clinton knowing the Panamanians already signed a contract to handover operations to a Hong Kong based CCP linked company.
>During Kennedy's presidency, the mob was in Cuba. Why? Gambling of course
I watched Godfather II, too
It's a jew theater
Q mentioned III, not II, but whatever. In PG research, there was a theory that they prefer dark meat, so Cuba and Haiti can both fit.
was posted last night too
Queen and BC going to the hospital and then coming out. Q's got a big remote control.
everybody watched 13 days
Well we have nukes in Turkey now and I kind of think Turkey is holding them hostage at this point.
MAD used to be what kept the peace, but now MAD is a pact with lock step Covid policies.
For some reason, I never really believed it. I understand that technologically, it's possible, but doesn't make sense that, then one day, they decided to reduce arms, but still keep enough to destroy the world. Sounds like a badly written plot line.
I mean I remember school drills as a kid getting under the desk, joking with my friends, to later understanding that shit wasn't gonna save us, then left wondering why they had us do that.
After 9/11, when they pumped the fear, it kind of clicked.
depends on your native tongue
i lived in a major city with a large defense industry which i was told would be a primary target of multiple icbms.
u don't learn them each individually. They are of combinations of building blocks
hand writing is stressed very hard in east asian countries. when they write latin script, each generation writes exactly alike.
in today's dynamic, if we were to assume it's not controlled by a global cabal, which strategic game would give the most advantage, chess, poker, or go?
they were the wealthiest and most populous country until the british forced opium on them. you don't do that by being retards. they even admit they had a 'hundred years of shame'. besides the well known things like gun powder, paper, etc. you should study why the brits, the french, germans, russians, wanted to go into china so bad. it's cause they made everything and was draining europes gold and silver through trade surpluses. the only ting the brits figured out was to sell them opium. why does the queen drink tea? why do europeans display their best CHINA and only use them for their most important occasions? why are ties made of silk. learn you dumbfuck. understanding the enemy is half the battle.
dumbfuck
no, i never heard of what he's implying. i mean that could happen in a private company, but a publicly traded company would not cap at a certain price. and this new trump company would take years before it hands out dividends
that's a dictionary. this is better if you want to learn.
the asteroid belt is a blown up planet and their original inhabitants colonized earth
>this is the current best model, subject of course to change,
>GIVEN FACTS that disprove it.
you see the problem?
>trust the science