>Crap Hitting The Fan
>
>Crap Hitting The Fan
>
>1 hour ago
>
>How in the hell do crew members get shot and not an actor unless he was screwing around at close range, there is something wrong with this.
>
action scenes are shot from various angles, including the front view, think logically if in the movie you see a guy facing the audience with a gun in his hand, the gun points in the general direction of the camera man
>>>14832184
>
>THAT, is an interesting thought. Chain of events.
>
>Cuban missile crisis, Kennedy forces the Russians to get the missiles out, Castro prob scared shittless, possible US leaders reconsider being Castro's friend instead of giving him the cold shoulder?
>
>It kinda boils down to who's REALLY running the show. Did the clowns make a deal with Cuba or did patriotic Americans make one? We still have Gitmo, so it seems that at least our military is on at least speaking terms with Cuba, or at least, paying big bucks to keep the base.
the deal between Kennedy and Krutchev was that the USA withdraws missiles from Turkey.
"did CIA make a deal with CUBA?" lol come on man
the USA pays something like 300 dollars a year because of the agreement done in the 30s …
the US considers the deal valid, the Cubans don't.
>>>14832229
>
>Oh, nm, I figured out who OBL is.
there were researchers who concluded Obama is Osama, based on analysis of the facial features
>>>14832249
>
>>Einstein's ranch?
>
>Relativity close
Einstein was a leftist, might have had secret mini nukes stashed in his ranch that got ignited
Pentagon told JFK that there is a Thucydides Trap situation, the time to hit Russia with nukes is now, they could take 150 million Soviets with a first strike and the retaliation strike could not take out more than 15 - 20 million Americans max , later it would be less winning …. JFK thought they were crazy
>>>14832274
>
>They shouldn't need even prop guns in movies.
https://features.hollywoodreporter.com/the-gun-industrys-lucrative-relationship-with-hollywood/
The NRA and the entertainment industry interact publicly as mortal enemies. But as the number of weapons shown in movies and TV steadily increases — and stars like Matt Damon and Angelina Jolie make fortunes wielding guns onscreen — a co-dependence that keeps both churning is revealed: “making the liberal bias a lot of money”
BURNISHED BY THE LOW LIGHT OF GLASS-WALLED DISPLAYS, THEY seem like ancient artifacts, but the objects here are beloved contemporary icons. One case houses the massive Smith & Wesson Model 29 wielded by Clint Eastwood's "Dirty Harry" Callahan in the 1973 film Magnum Force. In another rests the Beretta 92F used by Bruce Willis in Die Hard. All the great shoot-'em-up classics — The Bourne Identity, Pulp Fiction, The Wild Bunch — are here. This exhibit, celebrating cinema, isn't in Hollywood; it's thousands of miles away, in a museum at the headquarters of the National Rifle Association in Fairfax, Va.
gravity bombs
>>>14832280 (You)
>
>yes, mcnamara recounted the whole story of the meeting in his book.
I read about it in the Book JFK and the Unspeakable …
The book's central thesis is that Kennedy was a cold warrior who turned to peace-making, and that as a result he was killed by his own security apparatus
Published by the Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers, it received an award from the Catholic Press Association and coverage in the religious press; sales shot up after Oliver Stone recommended the book, with it featuring in Amazons Top 100 for a week The 2013 edition of the book was endorsed by Kennedy's nephew Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who said it had moved him to visit Dealey Plaza for the first time
>>>14832333
>
>For some reason, I never really believed it.
MAD is apparently problematic in the Game theory analysis:
In the conventional telling of the tale, the nuclear stand-off between the USA and the USSR attributes the following policy to both parties. Each threatened to answer a first strike by the other with a devastating counter-strike. This pair of reciprocal strategies, which by the late 1960s would effectively have meant blowing up the world, was known as ‘Mutually Assured Destruction’, or ‘MAD’. Game theorists at the time objected that MAD was mad, because it set up a PD [Prisoner's Dilemma -anon] as a result of the fact that the reciprocal threats were incredible. The reasoning behind this diagnosis went as follows. Suppose the USSR launches a first strike against the USA. At that point, the American President finds his country already destroyed. He doesn’t bring it back to life by now blowing up the world, so he has no incentive to carry out his original threat to retaliate, which has now manifestly failed to achieve its point. Since the Russians can anticipate this, they should ignore the threat to retaliate and strike first. Of course, the Americans are in an exactly symmetric position, so they too should strike first. Each power recognizes this incentive on the part of the other, and so anticipates an attack if they don’t rush to preempt it. What we should therefore expect, because it is the only NE of the game, is a race between the two powers to be the first to attack. The clear implication is the destruction of the world.
This game-theoretic analysis caused genuine consternation and fear on both sides during the Cold War, and is reputed to have produced some striking attempts at setting up strategic commitment devices. Some anecdotes, for example, allege that President Nixon had the CIA try to convince the Russians that he was insane or frequently drunk, so that they’d believe that he’d launch a retaliatory strike even when it was no longer in his interest to do so. Similarly, the Soviet KGB is sometimes claimed, during Brezhnev’s later years, to to have fabricated medical reports exaggerating the extent of his senility with the same end in mind. Even if these stories aren’t true, their persistent circulation indicates understanding of the logic of strategic commitment. Ultimately, the strategic symmetry that concerned the Pentagon’s analysts was complicated and perhaps broken by changes in American missile deployment tactics. They equipped a worldwide fleet of submarines with enough missiles to launch a devastating counterattack by themselves. This made the reliability of the US military communications network less straightforward, and in so doing introduced an element of strategically relevant uncertainty. The President probably could be less sure to be able to reach the submarines and cancel their orders to attack if prospects of American survival had become hopeless. Of course, the value of this in breaking symmetry depended on the Russians being aware of the potential problem. In Stanley Kubrick’s classic film Dr. Strangelove, the world is destroyed by accident because the Russians build a doomsday machine that will automatically trigger a retaliatory strike regardless of their leadership’s resolve to follow through on the implicit MAD threat but then keep it a secret. As a result, when an unequivocally mad American colonel launches missiles at Russia on his own accord, and the American President tries to convince his Soviet counterpart that the attack was unintended, the Russian Premier sheepishly tells him about the secret doomsday machine. Now the two leaders can do nothing but watch in dismay as the world is blown up due to a game-theoretic mistake.
This example of the Cold War standoff, while famous and of considerable importance in the history of game theory and its popular reception, relied at the time on analyses that weren’t very subtle. The military game theorists were almost certainly mistaken to the extent that they modeled the Cold War as a one-shot PD in the first place. For one thing, the nuclear balancing game was enmeshed in larger global power games of great complexity. For another, it is far from clear that, for either superpower, annihilating the other while avoiding self-annihilation was in fact the highest-ranked outcome. If it wasn’t, in either or both cases, then the game wasn’t a PD. A cynic might suggest that the operations researchers on both sides were playing a cunning strategy in a game over funding, one that involved them cooperating with one another in order to convince their politicians to allocate more resources to weapons.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-theory/#Mot
talibanis are not that interested in the outside world … and that means they have no plans to attack America …
>>>14832356
>
>>At the risk of starting another flame war (kek), nukes don't work and never did.
>
>then why do it, since it's pure retarded bullshit. i KNEW people who WITNESSED it. now KYS, glownigger.
it's the problem with doing one's own research if one has slept during the physics classes at school
>Anybody else see Bidan use hurricanes and floods as reasons why he had not gone to bordef.
>
>It's almost as if those events were planned excusez.
Using the HAARP to modify weather events?
Pedosta is a septuagenarian pencil neck … not the guy in the pic … I doubt he's been in a disco for a long time
>But there's no way to be certain, as I've never witnessed one in use and it's completely plausible that the powers that be have faked them using various techniques (as they've done with many other things)
like TPTB fake nuclear reactors by hiding diesel generators inside them?
>in the real world, trust and cooperation are the only long term winning strategies
following the Jesus strategy of turning the other cheek is a losing proposition in iterated PDs … cheating works as long as there are dupes around … initial trust plus tit for tat and then forgiving and a new start might work the best
actually when an event has happened the probability the odds for it are 1 or 100% … analyzing odds post facto is cheating, you can always pick up strange coincidences if you want
>>>14832534 (You)
>
>>like TPTB fake nuclear reactors by hiding diesel generators inside them?
>
>On the contrary, I believe nuclear power works and is amazing and excellent (which is why they make such a huge effort to suppress it and engender fear of it). Thorium reactors could easily obviate fossil fuels after a large initial investment, which would also create a lot of long-term high-paying high-education white collar jobs as well as half decent blue collar jobs to support them.
>
>If nuclear weapons were not real, I would say the specter they represent is part of the strategy to keep people afraid of the technology behind nuclear power so it cannot proliferate to the point that the elite can no longer sell us fossil fuels. But for the record, I do believe that in all likelihood, nuclear detonations are real.
well I believe nukes exists and the "van Halen belt" didn't prevent Moon Landings
>You can tell a lot about a person by their writing style. Is it true for Chinese characters?
Ask Obama's brother who lives in China and teaches piano and Chinese Calligraphy …
Mark Okoth Obama Ndesandjo …well he's a student of Chinese Calligraphy and a teacher of Piano, I slightly misremembered
I like Mark Obama better …