>>14837837

2 Q's in that. Wasn't there a marker 9?

>>14837979

Hey Baker. It's me who posts a lot of Joe's tweets. I don't care how you label either way…maybe you could use "Joe Tweet" instead? Just offering possible suggestion.

>>14838067

Thanks for your service, Baker! Greatly appreciated!

Listen to what this video says about previous misfires with same gun…

>>14838202

"2 misfires on the prop gun on Saturday, and the previous week"

????

>>14838247

I'm still not yet convinced either, anon.

>>14838213

Somebody besides Joe wanted all those Afghans here. Still waiting for explanation on that.

>>14838381

That is a great question, anon!

>>14838407

>NBC article providing cover for Baldwin made a bizarre reference to Hunt for Red October:

Okay….I'm gonna need to speak to the Movie Director, please.