Anonymous ID: 2c9bcb Oct. 23, 2021, 10:37 a.m. No.14841891   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>1899 >>1914 >>1963 >>2040

Wisconsin State Auditors Complete Election Audit ā€“ Due to Sampling, Lack of Auditor Expertise, and Technological Savvy ā€“ Itā€™s Grossly Inadequate ā€“ Exactly What Speaker Vos Wanted

October 23, 2021

 

The people of Wisconsin deserve much more. The results of an audit by the state audit team in Wisconsin were released this week. As predicted, these results lack the comprehensive audit work needed to uncover the fraud in the stateā€™s November 2020 Election.

Wisconsin House Speaker Robin Vos initiated numerous actions that showed he wasnā€™t really serious about getting to the bottom of the fraudulent results in Wisconsin.

 

One of these actions was to get the state auditors involved. Unfortunately, this exercise was lacking from the start. The state auditors lack the expertise that others focused on ballot reviews using AI have. The state also would likely sample their work, which is inadequate for election audits and bank audits as noted previously.

 

The state auditorsā€™ results were released this week and the results were just as expected. Although the auditors performed good work, due to the nature and significance of the fraud in the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, their work is inadequate.

 

On page 6 of the introduction to the audit, the auditors summarize some of the work they performed. They note that they ā€˜analyzedā€™ data and reviewed 14,710 absentee ballots.

 

 

The problem is there were millions of absentee ballots counted in the election, a small sample will miss numerous cases of fraud. Itā€™s like counting the $10 bills in a tellers drawer in a bank audit and saying the banksā€™ balance for all money in-house is accurate.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/wisconsin-state-auditors-complete-election-audit-due-sampling-lack-auditor-expertise-technological-savvy-grossly-inadequate-exactly-speaker-vos-wanted/

 

Link to audit report - https://www.scribd.com/document/534624286/Wisconsin-State-Auditor-Report-of-2020-Election#from_embed

Anonymous ID: 2c9bcb Oct. 23, 2021, 10:46 a.m. No.14841954   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>1963 >>2040

NIH Silently REMOVES ā€œGain of Functionā€ from Website After Report Confirms Directors Fauci and Collins LIED to Congress About Funding the Research in China

October 23, 2021

 

The walls are closing in on Tony Fauci.

 

Over the summer, Dr. Fauci testified before congress about the National Institutes of Healthā€™s (NIH) role in using US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain of function research in Wuhan, China which directly led to the Covid-19 outbreak.

 

Unsurprisingly, he shamelessly lied through his teeth, vigorously denying the agencyā€™s involvement when he was grilled by Republican Senator Rand Paul.

 

Now, his lies are catching up to him, so the NIH is scrambling to cover their tracks.

 

On Friday, after they couldnā€™t keep a lid on it for any longer, the NIH scrubbed ā€œgain of functionā€ and its definition from its ā€˜research involving potential pandemic pathogensā€™ page on its website.

 

From part of the now-deleted webpage, courtesy of the WayBackMachine:

ā€œThe term gain-of-function (GOF) research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agentā€¦. The subset of GOF research that is anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens, which are likely to make them more dangerous to humans, has been the subject of substantial scrutiny and deliberation.

 

Such GOF approaches can sometimes be justified in laboratories with appropriate biosafety and biosecurity controls to help us understand the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, assess the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, and inform public health and preparedness efforts, including surveillance and the development of vaccines and medical countermeasures.

 

This research poses biosafety and biosecurity risks, and these risks must be carefully managed. When supported with NIH funds, this subset of GOF research may only be conducted in laboratories with stringent oversight and appropriate biosafety and biosecurity controls(link is external) to help protect researchers from infection and prevent the release of microorganisms into the environment.ā€

 

Here is the NIH webpage today. (pic)

 

Twitter user Jeremy Redfern exposed the silent update in a detailed tweet thread that he released earlier in the day. All mentions to gain of function research on the page have been replaced with their new made-up term: ā€œenhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research.ā€

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/nih-silently-removes-gain-function-website-report-confirms-directors-fauci-collins-lied-congress-funding-research-china/