This is quite interesting for CNN
talking blanks, wads, set guns.
alec baldwin
Very informative
https://youtu.be/lPGoC-ilHOY
>>14845169 watch this video, expert on movie set guns
very interesting and detailed
so either they are going to set the other guy up as he was also on Lee shooting set, to take the heat off of Baldwin?
or
this a bad guy that they use to get guys like Lee and Baldwin to shut up or do what they want or to ruin career, he get the gun on set to do the damage?
all PB
so many people who love the eighties
when they wake up to what was really going on are going to be violently angry at Hollywood
this song is NOT about what we thought???
girls/women
NO
think children
think adrenochrome
think eating human flesh
think hunting
HUNGRY
like THE WOLF
Duran Duran ( that is interesting title choice for group come to think of it)
think Epstein
think Ghislaine
think Islands
think HRC
think Baldwin ring
think Oprah ring
Q crumbs
that damn red ring
this song needs to be worked into Q memes with images to wake
"Hungry Like The Wolf"
Dark in the city, night is a wire
Steam in the subway, earth is afire
Do do do do do do do dodo dododo dodo
Woman, you want me, give me a sign
And catch my breathing even closer behind
Do do do do do do do dodo dododo dodo
In touch with the ground
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
Smell like I sound, I'm lost in a crowd
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Straddle the line in discord and rhyme
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
Mouth is alive with juices like wine
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Stalked in the forest,
too close to hide
I'll be upon you by the moonlight side
Do do do do do do do dodo dododo dodo
High blood drumming on your skin, it's so tight
You feel my heat, I'm just a moment behind
Do do do do do do do dodo dododo dodo
In touch with the ground
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
Scent and a sound, I'm lost and I'm found
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Strut on a line, it's discord and rhyme
I howl and I whine, I'm after you
Mouth is alive, all running inside
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Hungry like the wolf
Hungry like the wolf
Hungry like the wolf
Burning the ground, I break from the crowd
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
I smell like I sound, I'm lost and I'm found
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Strut on a line, it's discord and rhyme
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
Mouth is alive with juices like wine
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Burning the ground, I break from the crowd
I'm on the hunt down, I'm after you
Scent and a sound, I'm lost and I'm found
And I'm hungry like the wolf
Strut on a line, it's discord and rhyme
'I howl and I whine, I'm after you
Mouth is alive, all running inside
And I'm hungry like the wolf
old comms were always in our face
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1995/06/29/Duran-40-years-for-White-House-shooting/5474804398400/
WASHINGTON, June 29 A Colorado man found guilty of attempting to kill President Clinton when he peppered the White House with gunfire last October was sentenced Thursday to 40 years in prison. Francisco Martin Duran stood emotionless as the judge delivered the stiff sentence, which he said was needed to ensure the future safety of the White House and the first family. In announcing the sentence, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Richey made an 'upward departure,' adding 12 years to the original prison time called for by the crimes Duran committed. 'Mr. Duran, you are still a human being,' Richey told Duran after imposing his sentence. 'I hope you will understand that the court considers you such.' But attacks against the president at the executive mansion 'cannot happen in the United States of America,' Richey said. In addition to the charge of attempting to kill Clinton, Duran was also indicted on four counts of assaulting a federal officer, two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, two counts of use of a weapon during the commission of a crime and two counts of destruction of federal property. Combined, the charges will hold Duran in prison until 2035 when, at age 66, he will be eligible for five years of supervised release. Duran also was fined $3,200 the cost of repairing the bullet holes in the White House. Duran, 26, of Colorado Springs, Colo., was arrested on Oct. 29 after he opened fire on the White House while the president was in the executive mansion watching a Saturday afternoon football game on television.
Duran was charged on Nov. 17 with attempting to kill Clinton. Passers-by on busy Pennsylvania Avenue which has since been closed off to vehicle traffic scurried for cover as the gunman opened fire with a Chinese-made SKS semiautomatic assault rifle loaded with a 30- round clip of ammunition. Several citizens on the scene tackled Duran and Secret Service agents then subdued him and took him into custody. Two of the arresting agents were present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the sentencing. Neither Clinton nor anyone else was injured, but bullet holes were later found in the windows of the White House press area. 'My actions on Oct. 29 were irrational and wrong,' Duran said in a soft-spoken statement he read to the court. 'What I thought was the right thing to do was truly irrational. 'I'm sorry I not only ruined my future but that of my wife and my boy,' Duran said.
cont:
old comms were always in our face
cont: https://www.upi.com/Archives/1995/06/29/Duran-40-years-for-White-House-shooting/5474804398400/
Duran's wife and 6-year-old son live in Colorado and did not attend the hearing. Duran, dressed in a blue jail uniform and wearing silver-rimmed glasses, a mustache and a goatee, said his intentions that day were suicidal, and that he chose to attack the highly secured White House because 'I couldn't do it myself.' When Duran was first apprehended outside the White House, he told Secret Service officers, 'Why didn't you shoot me? Why didn't you kill me?,' Defense Attorney A.J. Kramer said. Prosecutors said they were confident of evidence that suggested the shooting was indeed an assassination attempt, including a note found in Duran's truck that contained the words 'kill the prez.' Eric Holder, U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, said his office was 'very satisfied with the verdict.' Holder predicted that the harsh sentence 'will act as a deterrent' to future assaults on the White House. 'We hope that people get the word that the federal government and the law enforcement officers take this very seriously,' Holder said. The White House has been the target of three other intrusions in the past nine months. On Sept. 12, 1994, a man stole a plane from a Maryland airport and crashed it onto the White House grounds, killing himself and causing minor damage to the executive mansion. On May 25, 1995, a fired pizza delivery driver was arrested on assault and weapons charges after he scaled a White House fence with an unloaded gun and was tackled and shot by Secret Service agents. The very next day, an unarmed man jumped the White House fence and was immediately apprehended by Secret Service officers. Defense attorneys argued for a lighter sentence for Duran based on his difficult past. They cited an incident in 1991 in which Duran got into a fight at a bowling alley and then drove over a woman, fracturing her skull as an event that changed Duran. Duran, who was in the Army at the time of the incident, was sentenced to five years at Leavenworth Prison in Kansas. 'Clearly he became a changed young man at that point,' Kramer said. Prosecuting attorney Eric Dubelier painted Duran as a 'paranoid schizophrenic' who 'writes letters about violent homicidal and sexual fantasies.' 'There are a lot of people that start off with a tough life but still don't go out and try to kill the president,' Dubelier said.
this meme is truly funny ahahhhhaaahhhaaa
>https://www.instagram.com/p/CVZQxVELMpw/?utm_medium=copy_link
NEW WALTER PEARCE POST
click on image and it says
wetbrainupdates and victim0-o
>>14845309 Walter Pearce (Ray Chandler/Rachel Chandler Instagram friend/model) friend says:
"Whatever you hear about me please believe it. I no longer have time to explain myself. Youcan also add some if you want."
walter pearce
tattoos?? anything interdasting?
https://www.instagram.com/p/CVZQxVELMpw/?utm_medium=copy_link
Trump WANTS to lose this
all the taking heads are saying he will lose
to set the precednet about RELEASING and or witholding documents
presidential documents
executive privilege
when Trump "loses"
then it will apply to PAST presidential documents being released
if the Trump Jan 6 documents are released as "Trump does not want them released"
they all want them released
hahhaaaa boomerang
"no one has had the hutzpah to make these arguments before".
hutzpah
แดสootโฒspษ, hootโฒ-
noun
(Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity
https://youtu.be/JXflY7d9zHY
Norm Eisen on Trump's lawsuit to block release of White House records to Jan 6 committee
461 viewsOct 18, 2021
Trump KNOWS he did nothiong wrong, yet he is trying to block the release, all the left and media wnat him to lose, and docs released, which willset the precedent, then BOOMERRANG, all the old docs then can be seen from PASTT administrations as well on other key incients over decades.
TRUMP wants to lose this IMO.
Just like when he on purpose got himself impeached, then was vindicated.
THEY want it to move fast because Jan 6 is such an "emergency", so it may alljust backfire SOON
Trump wants this fastracked, he faking wnating to block the release.
When they all are screaming to see the docs, it will backfire when the precdent is set, them BOOM all other non sitting presidents docs can now be released, no privlege.
Movie is getting good
full discussion (cannot locate the full vid)
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/CPT/date/2021-10-18/segment/01
I am Chris Cuomo. Welcome to PRIME TIME.
Donald Trump is a big headline. Everybody's talking about it. But I think we got to get the context right.
Donald Trump is suing the January 6 committee and the National Archives, why? We'll go into the details and the legalities, or lack thereof. But here's the real answer. He's doing it to delay. And before you take any satisfaction in that, it may well work.
The former president's not putting any muscle behind blocking, banning, or any of the other people, the committee wants to testify. Why? Well, instead, Trump's lawyers are focusing on stopping, what they may really be worried about, what they call, quote, "Sweeping requests for documents and records."
Why? Because people can control what they say. They can spin. They can say they don't recollect. They can explain. Documents don't.
So, keep in mind, for all the bluster about executive privilege, when it comes to Bannon, Committee Chair, Congressman Bennie Thompson says, quote, "The former president has not communicated any such assertion of privilege," when it comes to his conversations, with a man, who at the time, was the host of a podcast, not a close counselor, as part of the government, meaning the only legal claim of privilege, we've seen from Trump, is about the documents. So, the party that he is targeting, the National Archives told him, quote, "Absent any intervening court order," they plan on handing the records over. And they should. Why?
Because in a statement, from the White House, Joe Biden, President, now, is standing by his decision to not assert privilege, because, quote, "Former President Trump abused the office of the presidency, and attempted to subvert a peaceful transfer of power."
Remember, everything about how this privilege, and how it has been exercised, suggests it is the sitting president, with the power to assert executive privilege. Period! Sitting president.
Again, why does this matter to Trump? This isn't about why Biden does or doesn't want to exercise. He can do whatever he wants, OK? He doesn't even have to explain it, when it comes to the privilege.
Documents can't plead the Fifth. They can't suddenly claim not to remember. If anybody knows the value of documents, it is Donald Trump. He spent his presidency, fighting to keep documents, like his taxes and bank loans, away from you and Congress.
The one document he was quick to hand over, remember the transcript of his so-called perfect phone call? It got him impeached. My next guest knows the importance of documents. He was Special Counsel in that impeachment.
cont:
full discussion (cannot locate the full vid)
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/CPT/date/2021-10-18/segment/01
cont:
Norm Eisen, welcome back.
Neither of us is surprised by this move. But maybe the form the move takes is a little surprising to you. What do you think of it, in terms of its tactic, and its likelihood of success?
NORM EISEN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST, HOUSE JUDICIARY SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP'S FIRST IMPEACHMENT, FORMER WHITE HOUSE ETHICS CZAR: Chris, thanks for having me back on the program.
We talked about this, as one of the strategies, would the committee be forced to make the first move, to enforce, or would Trump go to court, to block? I do not think that this lawsuit that was filed today is going to result in the withholding of these documents.
The President is essentially making two arguments, Chris. He's saying, first, "This is an overbroad subpoena. The committee is asking for too much." And second, that even if it's not overbroad, these documents are protected by executive privilege, the confidentiality that the law enshrines, for presidential communications.
[21:05:00]
But Chris, when you look at the underlying purpose, of this committee, and the law that applies that you need to have a valid legislative purpose, what could be more important than investigating an insurrection against the United States? So clearly, this is not overbroad. They're doing their job. And then, on executive privilege, the complaint talks again and again, about "The President." But Donald Trump is not the President. Joe Biden is the President. Joe Biden is the one, who decides, whether to apply these confidentiality rules. And he said "No," as to the initial set of documents.
So, I don't think it will work. And as you point out, it's a delay game. Nobody's had the hutzpah to make these arguments before. And Donald Trump is hoping to tie up the courts, in the aspiration that Congress flips, and he gets out of his subpoenas.
CUOMO: Let's litigate. The delay works. Because even garbage takes time to be thrown out.
He's going to put it in. They're going to have to calendar it. They're going to have to have hearings. They're going to have to have pre- trial hearings. They're not going to do, what you and I would call, an Article 78 proceeding, which is some speedy one and done.
Even if he gets an unusually conscientious judge, who deals with this, with all celerity of dispatch, very quickly, then he can appeal. And then he likely can appeal that appeal. And this kind of question, who knows that the Supreme Court doesn't think it's interesting to talk about?
What are your thoughts about that?
EISEN: Well, it's a risk. There's no doubt about it. He had success with it, when he was in the White House. But Chris, he's not in the White House now. He's bringing this lawsuit. The burden is on him.
And the courts can move fast, when it's an emergency.
CUOMO: Is it?
EISEN:
In the historic Nixon White House tapes case, four months,
Chris. We - this is an emergency. You and I've talked about this. Our democracy is under attack. Donald Trump's attacks, his "Big lie" driven assault, on our democracy, has not stopped. It's intensifying.
The courts need to handle it with dispatch. Congress needs to ask them to move very quickly. And Chris, it's going to be up to us. It's going to be up to Americans, to say, "Hey, this is important. Don't drag your feet." It can move quickly, if the courts decide to do it.
CUOMO: It is a novel question, though. This has never been litigated. We only have the course of performance that we've never seen an exercise, of this privilege, by a former president. They always ask a sitting president.
But this idea about the President has no precedent in the law. And that means even if it's four months, Norm, that's a long time, in this current climate, isn't it?
cont:
full discussion (cannot locate the full vid)
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/CPT/date/2021-10-18/segment/01
cont:
EISEN: '''
Well, if they can move that quickly, Chris, that'll be a modern-day miracle. We should insist on it. And - but I think that the, you know, when you look at the underlying arguments here, they don't have to cause the courts, to delay.
Simply because Donald Trump is the first one to have the hutzpah to make some of these arguments, doesn't mean it should slow things down. That's why we started with the urgent national imperative, to get at the truth, of the ongoing assault, on our elections, and on our democracy.
So, these - the novelty of these questions does not have to be, the mere fact, Chris, that no former president has ever asserted separation of powers, that these kinds of arguments are being made, none has ever taken on a current president, on the assertion of executive privilege.
It does. The courts can reject it. And they should, because they're not good arguments.
CUOMO: Right. But I'm not talking about the conclusion. I'm talking about the timing. And it seems that just by doing this, hasn't he bought himself, and his main guys, who are subpoenaed, until after the holidays, at a minimum?
EISEN: Not necessarily. What's going to happen now is - when I checked the docket, it was not in the docket.
If he wants this to move quickly, he's going to have to seek a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction. He's going to have to ask the court to make a fast decision. He's going to bear a heavy burden in doing that, Chris. He's going to have to show a strong likelihood of success on the merits.
We've just talked aboutโ
CUOMO: That's a good point.
EISEN: the reasons that a former president
CUOMO: That's a good point.
[21:10:00]
EISEN: โcan't do that. So, he's got to meet that hurdle. He'll have to meet it again. Look, the Supreme Court, if it ends up there, they rejected his attempt, to get a second bite at the apple, in the Mazars' case, about his financial documents, summarily.
So, things can move quickly. We need to treat it as an emergency. Congress needs to ask the courts. It's incumbent on the courts, to listen and, on all of us, to say,
"Hey, this is not business as usual. We want the rocket docket for the sake of our democracy."
CUOMO: That's a good point. Just very quickly, Norm, who decides whether or not he needs a TRO, or a preliminary injunction, in order to stop the subpoenas, from being enforced?
EISEN: Well, he's going to have to move for it. So, in the first instanceโ CUOMO: But why would he?
EISEN: it would be him and his
CUOMO: What if - what if he saysโ
EISEN: โand his lawyers.
CUOMO: โ"Let's just litigate this, and do the ordinary course of time, and not ask for anything like that."
EISEN: Then, as you quoted "The Archivist," if there's no binding court order, thenโ
CUOMO: So that's what they'd have to do.
EISEN: โthen this complaint is - does not take effect. And the documents can be turned over. So, he's going to have to move, if he wants to block it.
CUOMO: Right. So, he's going to have to move.
EISEN: We'll see if he -
he knows these are not good arguments.
He knows this is a delay game. So, we'll see if he tries to do that or not.
CUOMO: So, he's going to have to move for this type of relief. And so, he will be actually setting up an accelerated timeline, because those things have to be handled very quickly, and even the appeals are handled quickly.
That - those are good points that I hadn't focused on. And that makes me feel differently about the timing.
Norm Eisen, as always, you are value-added and a plus. Thank you.
EISEN: Thanks, Chris. Thank you.
>Trump KNOWS he did nothiong wrong, yet he is trying to block the release, all the left and media wnat him to lose, and docs released, which willset the precedent, then BOOMERANG,
all the old docs then can be seen from PASTT administrations as well on other key incients over decades.
>TRUMP wants to lose this IMO.
>Just like when he on purpose got himself impeached, then was vindicated.
>THEY want it to move fast because Jan 6 is such an "emergency", so it may alljust backfire SOON
>Trump wants this fastracked, he faking wnating to block the release.
>When they all are screaming to see the docs, it will backfire when the precdent is set, them BOOM all other non sitting presidents docs can now be released, no privlege.
>Movie is getting good
do you see what Trump is up to here
he is making himself look like he wants to hide documents as it make him look guilty and the haters pile on and force the issue and want it fast tracked as Jan 6 was so "hideous"
Trump is saying block all docs
saying privlege
BUT he wants to lose this
THEN when he loses publically
all the other past presidents docs can be released as Trump losing, this will set the precedent
they hate Trump so bad
and they are so sure he was behind Jan 6
they are blind to the trap kek
>The former president's not putting any muscle behind blocking, banning, or any of the other people, the committee wants to testify. Why? Well, instead, Trump's lawyers are focusing on stopping, what they may really be worried about, what they call, quote, "Sweeping requests for documents and records."
>Why? Because people can control what they say. They can spin. They can say they don't recollect. They can explain. Documents don't.
Trump knows there is nothing daming regarding him and Jan 6
but he knws it will open the door to all the other docs to be seen and the public awakening
when all comes out
Trump knows nothing damning re: Trump in docs for Jan 6
it is a trap for previous administrations and the real traitors Jan 6