Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 12:26 a.m. No.14846409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6414

>>14846388

Hey look - They almost nailed the year, even.

 

Meme'ing ideas"

โ€“"Green" rhymes with "Vaccine" so easy mod's there

โ€“Drop Xiden's face in over Heston's

โ€“Notice the 2nd graphic even shows "RIOT CONTROL" on the truck scooping up bodies KEK

 

This could produce some good memes - I am just a simple "Paint" anon though & will leave this for the pro's :-)

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 12:33 a.m. No.14846424   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14846391

Same here - this is not in any way, shape or form financial advice.

 

$PHUN is the other one I ran across but have not gotten in on that one yet. Was lucky to hear about $DWAC in time to get in around $28 though.

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 12:41 a.m. No.14846442   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6458 >>6496

>>14846426

Well, there ARE some stonks you might want to hold in times of uncertainty, and many anons may be unaware they even exist. See Direxion (and there are others who do the same sort of thing) line of funds if you are looking for a safety net in times of uncertainty.

 

Examples are their triple leveraged bear funds like: WEBS; SPXS; etc.

 

I am in no way associated with Direxion or a market professional, but I have used these on and off for the last 2 decades, when I don't feel like screwing with options because cannot get the timing close enough to clean house.

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 12:42 a.m. No.14846447   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14846426

Well, there ARE some stonks you might want to hold in times of uncertainty, and many anons may be unaware they even exist. See Direxion (and there are others who do the same sort of thing) line of funds if you are looking for a safety net in times of uncertainty.

 

Examples are their triple leveraged bear funds like: WEBS; SPXS; etc.

 

I am in no way associated with Direxion or a market professional, but I have used these on and off for the last 2 decades, when I don't feel like screwing with options because cannot get the timing close enough to clean house.>>14846443

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 12:50 a.m. No.14846464   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6479

>>14846458

cool, good job - I have 200 shares DWAC as well - but you got in earlier well done! :-)

 

I do not intend to flip for a quick profit on that one either, even if it goes back down next week. I am buying & holding this one, for sure.

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 1:08 a.m. No.14846507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14846500

P.S. I also just said I hold some triple-leveraged BEAR funds, fully expecting the next major, fake as shit financial meltdown. With any luck DJT's equities will keep going up as the cabal gets taken out, and [they] crash the market just to generally fuck over the little people but also to try and stop DJT. That scenario would be a win-win-win for me the way I am positioned right now.

 

And if none of that happens and I lose 100% of what I invested, that is okay too because I do not gamble more than I can afford to lose, and I do not gamble with other people's money (on margin).

Anonymous ID: 698aeb Oct. 24, 2021, 1:32 a.m. No.14846542   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6552

>>14846525

You are preaching to the choir, Karen (?). Decades ago I put together an article showing how the Dow30 had actually returned something like 0.004% return on "investment" since inception once you factor in basic inflation and transactional fees. Just use Yahoo! Finance basic info, line it out in a graph, and it is right there โ€“ smacks you right in the face.

 

In fact, with a bit more work I think it would have proved that the ONLY overall increase in "value" you get in any market (especially the real estate market but I had far less data available on it at the time) is due to / corresponds directly with the FEES collected on transactions.

 

It gets even better, because the Dow30 index that is most widely known by John Q Public is a rigged construct as well. They throw out underperformers and add in "rising up-and-comers" to try and make things appear rosier than they are. So if you line out the same data but using other, broader indexes everything looks even worse across the board.

 

But I would NEVER discourage someone from trying to own a piece of the pie and make some money. That is just being pessimistic, and telling people not to be free to do what they wish.