[ C P 19][showtheworldourpowerCoronavirusPandemicCOVID19]
What's that on his face? I thought the homeless were immune.
That's hilarious. Fuck Fauci.
>These faggots are all working together arent they?? What does everyone know that we can't know??
That's what gets me. These jokers just keep smiling despite all of the setbacks.
They MUST know something that we don't.
I like how that music fits in with scenes from V.
You're missing the point. The OP was about the guys on OUR side.
They're not fazed by all of the setbacks. Why?
>>You're missing the point. The OP was about the guys on OUR side.
>ok. then shouldn't you take that as reassuring instead of concerning?
Not concerned. Just wondering what the hell is going on.
The audits were supposed to blow everything up months ago.
Yet they still seem confident about…something.
I'm not terribly concerned about the "own nothing" part. I don't like the "no privacy" part. Are they planning to spy on us in the fucking bathroom, too?
>you will own no bathroom, and you'll LIKE it.
I already don't own a bathroom because I rent.
All I own is my computer and a bunch of junk, kek.
>Ownership of properties, and privacy go hand in hand.
I don't own my house. I rent. The landlord doesn't have the right to spy on me just because I don't own the house.
I get your point but it doesn't square with every situation.
The only "strategy" is see at work is an attempt to impoverish us so that they can install their communist system. They don't care if "green energy" even works. They just want us subjugated by any means.
>you DO own the house for the period covered by the rent paid.
That's the understanding under the current laws. So what does WEF actually mean by "own nothing"? Does it mean that I won't own my computer anymore? It will be rented? Or just given to me (in which case I would still own it)?
It seems that the "own nothing" rhetoric is just meant to get under our skin.
>He stated that he's fine with the "not owning shit" piece of the WEF plans…
That's because I already own (almost) nothing. I did not say that I am against ownership. After all, I rent my house from another individual who does actually own it. If my landlord can't own the house then who do I rent from? That's the big question.
I agree with what you just said. I'm just asking what "own nothing" would really mean in practice.
I get that. There are already corporations that own housing blocks. It doesn't change the tenant/landlord dynamic just because a corp owns the house instead of an individual. Existing law would have to be amended to change the dynamic.
I'm not shilling. I'm just trying to ignore that other anon. Does it make me a co-shiller because I won't engage a shill? Thanks for standing up to him on my behalf, by the way.