That meme is very true. Now think about that. Take ice cream for instance, you USED to be able to buy a gallon or half gallon, what can you buy now? The price DOESN'T go down, the containers get smaller. What does that suggest? The producers of products seem to know what's up, but either willingly or unwillingly HIDE the inflation by packaging their products in smaller containers, yet keep the price about the same or a little higher. So, in essence, you are paying MORE and getting LESS, but the illusion is, you are getting the same and paying about the same. Not so. You are paying more, and getting less.
I suspect these globalist assholes are gonna eventually push a, "global," currency, they they control and can easily manipulate, but in order to facilitate global acceptance, they are gonna have to hose all the world economies to, "show the world," that there is a, "problem," and they have the, "solution." Order out of chaos.
What form that currency takes is anyone's guess, but they will of course tout it as the best thing since buttered bread. They will probably use all the usual excuses for why theirs is better but…will completely IGNORE the fact that gold and silver worked just fine for thousands of years. Gold and silver do have their problems, but far less than the bullshit they come up with. The founding fathers wanted to keep the wealth of the country in the hands of the people for a reason. Gold and silver worked for thousands of years, it will still work. Limited amount of raw materials, i.e. gold and silver, keeps them from creating money out of thin air. It's also pretty easy to figure out if they are playing games with the precious metal content of said coins. Look at history, whenever kings wanted to play war, they either started playing with the content of their coins, in order to make more of them, or played other stupid games, again, to make more coins, but it's pretty easy to spot.
If you create beings with freedom of choice, did you create their choices? I believe God KNEW what the result would be, but allows us to find out for ourselves why certain things are bad choices. God didn't want robots.
Good and evil are subjective??!!! Boy are you wrong. Ok, well if they are subjective, then I can kill you for reasons of my own and be justified then right? It's all subjective. You're not too bright are ya?
There ya go, "subject to the whims of humans." God is NOT in the same category as normal humans. God is just, humans however, not so much.
There is SOME objectivity, in the sense that while God prohibits murder, He also recognizes that, because we have a right to defend ourselves and our homes and family, that it sometimes happens. There is a difference between killing someone who breaks into your house and threatens your family, and someone who kills someone else for gain or other reasons. Then ten commandments DON'T say, "Thou shalt not kill," it says, "thou shall not commit MURDER. Killing in self defense is NOT murder.
I would also like to point out, that your initial statement was that good and evil, are subjective, which is not the case, but you then proceed to tell me about man made laws, and ignore the fact that regardless of what laws we make, good and evil are still not subjective.
God made the rules, He created us. The rules are ABSOLUTE, if they were not, then we could make up our own rules and justify anything, which you seem to be trying to do. If Gods rules were not absolute, then He could not justly penalize us for anything. However, they ARE absolute.
Their problem was that David and his men were, "doing work," on the Sabbath. God made the Sabbath FOR man, not the other way around. So it's not really a big deal in Gods eyes.
In essence, God is forgiving and is more interested to what's in your heart, rather then every little thing you may do. We are ALL guilty of breaking the law one way or another, that was the whole point of Jesus coming, He had to repair the rift. The law still stands, it always will, but God is willing to forgive us if we at least acknowledge Him and His son, and then try our best to adhere to the rules, even though we will goof up sometimes. Cain and Able is a good example. They both brought sacrifices, God accepted Abel's but rejected Cain's, why? Abel gave his sacrifice in love for God, Cain did it because he felt he HAD to, his heart wasn't in it.
That's the difference.
Oh? How does God see it do you think? Do you think He sees things in shades of gray? When it comes to the law, it IS black and white, the question then becomes, what to do about it. What is/was God's solution? Forgiveness, but don't forget, the law STILL had to be satisfied, that is WHY Jesus had to do what He did. He became the unblemished sacrificial lamb so that the rest of the worlds sins could be atoned for. Those who fail to embrace the lamb, will indeed be made to pay the full penalty of the law with their own blood. So, is God ambivalent towards the law? No, the penalty still has to be paid, the question is, WHO is going to pay it?