Anonymous ID: ec06c1 Oct. 26, 2021, 12:32 p.m. No.14862155   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2175

>>14861451 RittenHouse Winning (LibelSuits?) pb

 

https://nationalfile.com/judge-those-allegedly-shot-by-rittenhouse-cant-be-called-victims-during-trial-rioters-and-arsonists-both-more-accurate/

 

JUDGE: Those Allegedly Shot By Rittenhouse Can’t Be Called ‘Victims’ During Trial, ‘Rioters’ And ‘Arsonists’ Both More Accurate

''The judge ruled on several pretrial motions, including whether or not those shot could be referred to as "rioters" or "arsonists" - ''

by CULLEN MCCUE 26 October 2021.

 

Wisconsin Judge Bruce Schroeder laid out the final ground rules on evidence for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in a pretrial hearing on Monday. Schroeder ruled on several motions from both the prosecution and defense relating to terminology, evidence and use of force experts.

The prosecution had sought to bar the defense from referring to the men allegedly shot by Rittenhouse as “rioters” or “arsonists” but Judge Schroeder denied the prosecution’s request. “If more than one of them were engaged in arson, rioting, looting, I’m not going to tell the defense you can’t call them that,” the judge said.

 

The judge also ruled that Gaige Grosskreutz, Joseph Rosenbaum or Anthony Huber, the two latter of which were killed as they pursued Rittenhouse, could not be referred to as “victims.”

 

“The word ‘victim’ is a loaded, loaded word,” Judge Schroeder said. “‘Alleged victim’ is a cousin to it.”

 

At one point, the judge rebuked Binger for nonchalantly referring to acts of arson. “All we’re talking about is arson, we’re talking about being loud and disorderly,” Binger said of Rosenbaum’s conduct on the night of the rioting.

 

-“I can’t believe some of the things you’re saying,” the judge interjected. “All we’re talking about is arson? Come on.”

Anonymous ID: ec06c1 Oct. 26, 2021, 12:36 p.m. No.14862175   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2180 >>2199 >>2242

>>14862155

 

During the Rittenhouse motions today the State was ridiculed by the judge for saying “all we are talking about here is arson” __to which the judge responded, “I can’t believe some of the things you’re saying.. come on!”__

7:39 PM ¡ Oct 25, 2021¡Twitter for iPhone

 

https://twitter.com/Johnmcurtis/status/1452781874028351499

Anonymous ID: ec06c1 Oct. 26, 2021, 12:51 p.m. No.14862278   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2328 >>2431

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1452781874028351499?refresh=1635277588

 

20h, 7 tweets, 3 min read

 

During the Rittenhouse motions today the State was ridiculed by the judge for saying “all we are talking about here is arson” to which the judge responded “I can’t believe some of the things you’re saying.. come on!”

 

The full exchange of the prosecutor arguing against the judge permitting video evidence of Kyle Rittenhouse’s assailants behavior and actions on the night of August 28, 2020.

1/2

The judge previously denied prosecution’s request to admit video of Kyle Rittenhouse’s involvement in previous entanglements as it had nothing to do with Rittenhouse’s right to self defense in a completely separate incident.

2/2

During arguments the prosecution argued against the defense referring to radical left violent extremists Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz as “rioters, looters, and arsonists”.

1/2

The prosecution continues to cry about the judge not permitting the prosecution to refer to the three above named terrorists as “victims”.

2/2

Kyle was looking sharp in today’s motions hearing.

 

It appears as though Kyle is rightfully being coached as to how to properly maintain his appearance to better suit a favorable ruling with the jury.

In the photo.

 

Kyle Rittenhouse poses with all of the people he victimized the night of August 25, 2020.