>$450K per person
its not a commitment
its a toothless bait by the left
an "incentive"
its fake
If anyone actually gets it, it will just be a poster child investment
they want 'em comin in
>$450K per person
its not a commitment
its a toothless bait by the left
an "incentive"
its fake
If anyone actually gets it, it will just be a poster child investment
they want 'em comin in
>$450K per person
its not a commitment
its a toothless bait by the left
an "incentive"
its fake
If anyone actually gets it, it will just be a poster child investment
they want 'em comin in
no they won't, its bait.. best case, they get to come here and blame conservatives and trump for not being able to do that and then commit voter fraud and other crimes on behalf of their new overlords, as human criminal liability shields
Its not for all immigrants… its specifically for people who were separated… so you have to bring some kids you're willing to let them traffic…
its bait.
that too.. designed to fail, yet produce
Happy hunting, anon
You simpleminded fucks.. its not the nipple or the vag or the anus that makes something pornographic.. thats just your coombrain reasoning because you have a visual nipple/anus/vag fetish from all your porning.. sex is sex.. something that suggestive is porn.. if you censor porn, it doesn't become "duhhh not porn anymore teehee" unless you're some half-baked liberal logic retard
And who gives a shit if she's 18 or not, ya fucks.. barely legal? some defense.. its sick.. just own it.. its for your own good.. no one thinks any less of you after owning that its perverse and you're not fooling anyone into thinking its not.
Not every kind of stupid can be argued with..
You got tranny logic going strong.. "it's not porn, it identifies as 'just an image' "
Right, the shills are now criticizing the use of porn among "non-shills".. fuck off coombrain
I didn't suggest it was 'barely legal', that was the defense I was criticizing coombrain.. like other anon said, that's an underage picture of her like so many here are..
What hit a nerve for me is the idiocy of those defending it.. its not defensible while so many nobler things are.
I was using the concept of censored porn in comparison to cropped porn.. again, you just try to play gotchya on bullshit when you know you're wrong.. its liberal logic.. carry on faggot
>cropped porn is still porn
>Nope, can be used without problems as reaction pics, newfag.
No, you can't crop child porn and use it without problems as reaction pics, newfag.. child porn is still child porn.. Ask your mom what she thinks about posting pics of children either getting fucked or posing nude as though getting fucked "But ma, nothings showing, so its just intellectual material"
Fuckk off
>>14877385 repeat retardation, already answered
>>14877386 nil
>>14877389 changing subject, probably but not because of this.. I eat the red meat and smoke like a chimney.. at present I'm chill as fuck