>>14895192

>Next up? Heels? Will take another year to tear her down.

Looked quickly at a video of Heels facing a heckler. Heels told him to talk to her one on one after the speech. Saw Bidan say the exact same thing at a McAuliffe rally to people doing a we love Trump chant. Both go by the playbook only. Nothing real about them and people don't buy what they're trying to sell.

Both were haughty & condescending, even trying to pawn off the focus group developed scripts they are given. Isn't enough lipstick available in the supply chain for the suits to ply their magic with these two.

Brandon is worse than Carter, IMO, since Carter was not unlikeable and didn't talk down to people. He was just inept and docile, due somewhat to trying to bring his own people in rather than use the DC hired guns. Brandon is inept, is a fucking Joke on the world stage, and talks shit like a bully that he couldn't back up without security details he's had his entire life.

Heels combines the worst attributes of LBJ, Clinton & Obama. Nasty, prima donna and because … fuck you, rolled into one.

She will also be the one who gets a NBC case to the SC. Not that they'll do shit, but it will bring the best authorities on the founder's NBC paradigm onto the stage. That could blowback on Obama. Thing with Obama is, if he was not born in CONUS or territories, he's not even a citizen. Mother was too young, according to citizenship law in place at the time, to transfer citizenship to a foreign soil birth.

Heels will have to go heavy handed like the NZ and OZ pols., and it will blow up. Country will shut down. 6 months, max, I think.

.>>14895481

>Wouldn’t that negate everything he ever did or signed? Illegitimate?

I'm beginning to think that POTUS can be simply decided upon by congress.

It is in principle, similar to the situation that will occur when Joe goes and Harris comes in. She'll nominate a VP that congress will vote on. No public election necessary. Also similar to the original procedure of having the states' congresses appoint senators to DC.

Elections, then, are keepsake category, for tradition and gaslighting the people into thinking they have some type of power to choose their leaders. A formality, for suggestive purposes only.

This may be the reason for the court decisions we've seen. No standing because congress can pick whom they choose. No concern for election fraud because elections are merely showpieces with no binding authority.

It would follow, then, that Obama was actually POTUS because Congress appointed him, just as Bidan is. Issue with Obama would be Pelosi, who knowingly signed off on a constitutionally ineligible person to be chosen as POTUS.

So, in Heel's case, although Heel's may have been appointed by Congress as VP, they did not have the authority to appoint an ineligible person, according to a traditional interpretation of the constitution.

Might be, too, stretching a bit, though, that the Jan 6 shenanigans had an ulterior, parliamentary motive to cover for the appointment of Bidan & Heels. Something along the lines of some arcane rule dealing with legal actions while under an insurrection. They have the lawyers, too, to make shit up as they go, if they need an arcane rule to fall back on.