Anonymous ID: 817a57 Nov. 1, 2021, 3:26 p.m. No.14901885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1968

>>14901560

 

That was our nature the way God created it.

It was no longer that nature once Adam sold us all under sin.

The fallen nature is a subject (slave) of sin.

It may freely sin as much as it wants,

sin whatever sin it wants,

sin whenever it wants,

but sin it must.

(This is why we need earthly authorities so as not to descend into anarchy.)

It has no choice but to sin.

That was not the nature of which God created Man in the beginning.

This is why there is an original Adam,

from whom we all receive that fallen nature;

and there is the Last Adam,

from whom men receive the nature made after Himself,

Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ redeemed a people from the slavery to sin,

freeing them to love the Father,

freeing them from a mind at enmity against him.

 

Fallen man's mind is at enmity against God.

That is not the love of God.

None loved God first who are born anew of above.

God loved them first,

as He died for them while they were yet sinners.

Anonymous ID: 817a57 Nov. 1, 2021, 3:55 p.m. No.14902080   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14901601

 

Convenient that the whole quote isn't provided,

but is merely piecemeal at that final point.

This is how Luther's quotes are often twisted.

Regardless,

there is no "queen of heaven" other than the one of which the Scriptures speak,

the one connected to the cause of Israel's desolation to BABYLON, because of the apostates among them seeking this abomination.

 

That it is said Protestants are "refusing to give any honor to Mary" is in itself deceptive.

What is really meant by that,

they are not "honoring" her with the made up unscriptural honors assigned to her by the Papacy,

such as queen of heaven.

The real Mary was blessed in being the unique descendant of David,

and for that,

ordained to give birth to the flesh of God the Word,

Jesus Christ.

As well,

she is counted among the Heavenly Jerusalem,

of those in Christ.

There is no greater honor than being of citizenry and in Christ Jesus.

Anonymous ID: 817a57 Nov. 1, 2021, 4:01 p.m. No.14902118   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14902037

 

This is called "moving the goal posts",

or redefining words.

Rather than judging by the words,

one can see by actions exactly what is really occurring,

as well as by the lying doctrines adopted regarding her,

and finally,

one can see by the Scriptures the lack of verity in those innovations.

Anonymous ID: 817a57 Nov. 1, 2021, 4:05 p.m. No.14902160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2174

>>14902053

 

From which Scripture did the Papacy develop the attribution of her as a "protector"?

There is none.

In Scripture,

Christ and God is shown as the Protector.

This is a prime example of attributing a characteristic of God to a creature,

that despite using the word "dulia",

it is by any other name "worship" and therefore,

idolatry.

Mary protects nothing.

She simply does not have that power.

It is only God's.

Anonymous ID: 817a57 Nov. 1, 2021, 4:14 p.m. No.14902241   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14902203

 

No.

I just said the original Sabbath day under the law was a type and shadow of Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ is the Sabbath Day,

because He is the Rest from having to keep the Law perfectly as He fulfilled all righteousness.