Did we call this?
▶Anonymous (You) 09/10/21 (Fri) 12:41:04101ec9 No.14553838 >>14553848 >>14553856 >>14553857 >>14553872 >>14553877 >>14553891 >>14553897 >>14553905 >>14553927 >>14553936
3_naked_women_that_are_old_now_Merkel.jpg
Hey Anons…Riddle me this=
Japan has pulled Moderna Vaccine doses due to contamination (see links directly below). It sounds like the contamination was only seen in certain lots…not all doses. I spent a couple of years working with the Japanese, I found them to be a beautiful people but also conscientious and meticulous. So if a group of people were to flag an issue with certain lots, I'm not surprised it was the Japanese.
So…I got a couple of questions:
1) Why do we think the contamination was limited to these lots only going to Japan?
2) If Japan felt it was significant enough to pull millions of doses, why isn't the rest of the world at least halting the administration of this vaccine until an inspection/sampling of lots can be done?
3) For the conspiracy inclined…do you really believe that these tainted lots are due to some flaw in quality control or is it intentional?
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/26/japan-pulls-1point6-million-moderna-vaccine-doses-over-contamination-concerns-.html
https://arynews.tv/japan-moderna-vaccine-vials/
https://japantoday.com/category/national/moderna-says-tainted-covid-vaccines-sent-to-japan-contained-steel
Over the years here I found myself thinking that I'm being too cynical…only later to discover that I wasn't cynical enough.
So…let's assume that certain lots were intentionally tainted to cause harm to the recipients. What might be the best (most evil) way to deploy these tainted lots to the world?
1) Maybe…administer the un-tainted doses to the aged and sick first…this will build confidence that the vaccine is safe.
2) Maybe…administer the un-tainted doses to the medical community…if the vaxed medical community started to drop…it would be harder for them to blindly believe the narrative that it was all due to the un-vaxed.
3) Maybe…increase the percentage of tainted lots to the 2nd dose…slow the public awareness.
4) Maybe…focus the tainted doses on regions that are conservative / distrustful of the govt. The regions that have the greater numbers of un-vaxed will have the greatest issues because those that are vaxed there will be shedding variants and infecting all.
https://www.informedchoiceaustralia.com/post/uncensored-dr-janci-chunn-lindsay-ph-d-molecular-biologist-and-toxicologist
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-vaccines-must-be-halted-immediately-renowned-toxicologist-tells-cdc/
https://www.npr.org/2021/09/08/1035045959/hospitals-in-northern-idaho-begin-rationing-care-after-covid-19-surge
So Anons…am I being too cynical?
>>14553838 (You)
Say you had a sample pool:
[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]
you can see that within the total pool are separate pools and the goal is to turn every 0 into a 1 by the least amount of insertions possible, while each insertion turns the 0's next to it to 1's.
So what you're going to do is, since each 1 turns the 0's on each side of it to 1's as well, you will use the number that is the GCD of both the infection and the pool. in this case 3 is the infection radius and 12 is the pool length so 3 is the GCD, so you would infect every 3rd dose in this case.
I imagine [they] built a model and determined the GCD of the 'pools' they wanted to infect and utilized that number to come up with the amount of tainted doses and distribution.
maths niggers, cuz fuck yeah!