dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: e1f72f Nov. 3, 2021, 2:49 p.m. No.14916890 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>7016

>>14916847

this bake looks like the best

and you were first

congrats baker

been waiting

i'm postin here

Anonymous ID: e1f72f Nov. 3, 2021, 2:49 p.m. No.14916896 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6903

@stkirsch

I keep trying to get someone qualified to debate our team of vaccine safety experts. Still crickets.

To: Bonnie Maldonado:

Cc David Reiman: Mathew Crawford: Jessica Rose: Peter Doshi: Peter McCullough: James Lvons-Weiler: Bret Weinstein:

Subject: stopping vaccine misinformation… will you debate us?

Bonnie,

Will you and your Stanford colleagues like Dr. Reiman, debate our team of vaccine safety experts?

Otherwise, we will continue to spread "misinformation" because nobody corrects us.

We have appealed to the medical community by publicly calling for a debate on the data. No takers.

If we are wrong, we'll correct our error.

Misinformation exists because none of the proponents will take an hour of their time to show us where we got it wrong. The Biden administration says stopping medical misinformation is a high priority.

If you don't correct us, we will start spending a lot of money on ads to educate the public that the vaccines are unsafe.

Is that what you want?

-steve

>>14916896

Steven Kirsch wants to know why Bonnie Maldonado won't debate docs who disagree with her ideas about Covid, its transmission, etc. Probably because her focus is not on real science, but on looking at Covid thru an "equity lens."

Bonnie Maldonado DIG

Yvonne "Bonnie" Maldonado is an American Professor of Pediatrics and of Health Research and Policy at Stanford University, with a focus on Infectious Diseases. She founded Stanford's pediatric HIV Clinic and now serves as Stanford University School of Medicine's Senior Associate Dean of Faculty Development and Diversity.

Wikipedia

MAY 2020

It seems that Bonnie is frens with the Zuckerbergs -

https://epublications.marquette.edu/zuckerberg_files_videos/294/

35 minutes

i vaguely remember the vid, but not her. Interesting in retrospect, you can see the spin more clearly.

As ofMay 2020, she was supposed to do a study of Covid testing in the Bay Area (serology and PCR testing).

Claims that PCR takes "a gene" and multiplies it to see if you're infected (WRONG - gene has never been isolated)

Serology test - measures antibodies (if she is the one developing this test, would be skeptical about the results)

At this point, she is interested in antibodies - if we get them, how long will they last?

(Betcha a nickel she's less interested now, because that would go againt the "all-must-vax" narrative, but needs a DIG)

Says she knows some of the tests are not very accurate - also that the Stanford tests are "VERY ACCURATE" but does not say what they are

If they are so accurate, why aren't they being used EVERYWHERE? Does not say

Says she thinks the number of positive tests will the LOW (!)

Says they're gonna do tests "with the virus itself" (that would be a trick - since it has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED)

Says the only protection is from antibodies or separation - talks theoretically about drugs for treatment, but nothing about existing treatments like HCQ (etc).

Mentions children as being "very good at spreading diseases." FEAR PORN with no data - planting the seeds…..

FAST FORWARD A YEAR

She's lost interest in either herd immunity or antibodies - now interested in "vaxxes" and social equity re Covid.

Video: COVID-19: Equity Framework in Treatment and Vaccination for Children and Adults with Disabilities

https://youtu.be/gdV03uulx_A

~34 Why are Covid Vaxxes Important for Children? SEE CLIP''

She claims the hospitalization and death rates are MUCH HIGHER than for other diseases.

This is not true - look at the figures for influenza.

In addition, the claimed figure of 185 child deaths from Covid in 2020 is probably completely distorted.

We know that the numbers for ALL deaths from Covid have been grossly inflated (and that most are for people that died WITH covid, not from it - that only 4-6% of reported deaths are directly from Covid - if that).
We also know that most of those deaths were entirely avoidable had proper treatment been given (IVM, HCQ, etc).
We know that children almost always have VERY mild cases of covid - but she stresses "infection rate," not severity. Focus is on them being "sources of transmission" although there are studies showing this is not a problem.
We know that many of those 185 "covid" deaths are likely from INFLUENZA, because any death from influenza would likely have been counted as covid either by mistakes (dying WITH, not FROM) or deliberately (because of financial incentives.)

There's a little more - she claims that the death toll for children is up to 260 by the time of this talk. Is this true?

if she's right, why won't she debate those who disagree??