Anonymous ID: 63f6a5 Nov. 3, 2021, 5:04 p.m. No.14917751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7767

Law fags, does an inner office memorandum referencing a “face covering policy” that does not exist, carry any weight regarding discipline? County level govn. job with county administrator who initiated this memo. No policy on file, only memos. Declaration of emergency expired but county is still mandating facial coverings in all county owned/leased buildings. Violators will simply be trespassed from property.

 

Wondering if this is a convenient loophole exploited by county administrator/commissioners or if this is illegal but being followed by the uninformed because of fear.

 

Pretty sure many counties around the country may be advancing the agenda in similar fashion.

Anonymous ID: 63f6a5 Nov. 3, 2021, 5:32 p.m. No.14918086   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8174

>>14917767

 

Thanks I’ll look more into it. Hard to decipher for a high school edjumocated peasant. Also hard to find viable source as it seems all searches turn up biased bullshit opinions some leftist brainwashed asshat wrote.

Anonymous ID: 63f6a5 Nov. 3, 2021, 5:34 p.m. No.14918108   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8304

>>14917767

Another thought, if in anons line of work it is necessary to wear half mask, n95 on occasion or respirators, not sure that angle would work unless it is proven that facial coverings hamper ones health.