>>14919175 lb

>>14919219 lb>>14919391

Don't tell the doctors who give MILLIONS of IU in D3 shots.

>Taking 60,000 international units (IU) a day of vitamin D for several months has been shown to cause toxicity.

500,000 IU is less than 9 days worth at the rate you referenced.

It's NOT enough to push toxicity, but is enough to rapidly correct a deficiency…which is endemic and especially if viral illness is manifest.

You're trying to get blood levels of 25(OH)D up into the upper half of the range, ideally over 50ng/ml. It takes about 500,000 to do this in the time required by someone with an active infection. You can go slower, but why?

I have many years of ACTUAL F'G EXPERIENCE WITH THIS.

Please stop being a reactionist if you haven't actually put in the time to understand the subject.

Both Ivermectin and D3 are ridiculously safe. But, hey you're aRED TEXTwarning reactionary. Chill out big pharma defender.

>>14919402

Breaking down

>>14919391

>>14919391

Want to go into the deep water on the Ivermectin dose recommended? dis fun

You're theRED TEXTalarmist. C'mon. You understand animal to human conversions. You've studied the case studies, you've done your homework.

Yes, be careful taking advice on the internet. Be careful acting like an expert…if you aren't.

>>14919664

It's many things. It's not a vitamin as much as an epigenetic hormone. It actually tells genes to turn on and off. It also docks on t-lymphocytes in the immune system to tell them to attack disease agents. They are covered with D receptors. A thousand other things as well. That's why it makes us feel good…we need it, most have far too little, and its deficiency causes a textbook full of diseases which get treated incorrectly symptomatically instead of correctly at the root causes. Big pharma knows this and promotes the D toxicity scare…yet in practice it is almost never observed, and one of the principal researchers on its safety when asked what the toxic level was, admitted they never found one. Ever.

A lot of press is given to its ability increase calcium absorption and increased levels of calcium in urine, but when studied, the formation of actual stones does not differ from placebo.

>>14919664

>it's an immune supressant

Literally just the opposite. It activates and enable the immune system.

>>14919747

Yes, in massive quantities, but these nervous nancies on here do a great disservice with 5 minutes of mainstream copypasta fear porn. Then they want to argue with people who have years of actual real world experience with human beings and decades of graduate level research to back it up. ffs…I love this place and I hate this place sometimes.

>>14919774

Try increasing your magnesium, niacin (real flush niacin) and thiamine intake along with greens. You should get your levels checked. You may be fine and don't need any. A small percentage of people get enough from sun exposure, but it's too few. There's a lot going on with endothelial function.

>>14919822

You know you better than anyone. Melatonin is supposed to be super safe and benign, but at around the 10mg level it gives me a days long headache, so we're all our own best doctors at the end of the day.

>>14919873

All good. Suggestions, not assumptions. BP is vascular tone and a few things help it. It took 60 years to figure out that I didn't absorb thiamine well from food. Even redonkulous amounts…but a shot every week or so does wonders. It's a journey. Best of luck.