>>14935826 lb
>we don't lack all, but as i keep saying its not as easy as saying choose this or choose that because it depends where you start what your perception of those choices are.
Of course! But that's true for every single person
>>14935826 lb
>we don't lack all, but as i keep saying its not as easy as saying choose this or choose that because it depends where you start what your perception of those choices are.
Of course! But that's true for every single person
not how I define it. in this sense, yes, there are influences out there that seek to define your choices and guide you towards a preferred choice. that's calling living in the world. it's funny you're on this board where many have made the choice to question what so many others don't. perhaps, though, it's their choice to go along with the program.
if mind control worked that well, you wouldn't need force.
well you are demonstrating poor attempts at mind control (mine). it ain't working too well. insults generally don't
even toilet ratings can't budge the smug, self-satisfied superiority of those fucks
nah. I have read about of all those things you mentioned. they constitute the attempt by some to influence others, and yes, it has been done successfully. the fact that there are people out there who want to influence you in no way proves that they actually control your thoughts.
this is a point all those ratings articles miss. they are funded in your cable bill, even if you never watch
well you don't either so we're even
raging conspiracy theorist today, savior of the republic tomorrow
lots of people i know just sticking their fingers in their ears and going, la la la, getting the next shot, la la la, mandates who cares, la la la, going to keep pretending covid is really really dangerous
nah. not receipts. sure there are intel agents in the news biz. but the money still comes out of corporate coffers. they fund propaganda because they are part of the class its meant to uphold