>>1493619 LB
yes this could be the final piece potus was waiting for
but then again could be another head fake
lets all hope
yeah
there is nothing worse than waiting preparing and then………… ahh nothing happened
we have been thru that too but our lives are not the ones at stake
and we are part of The Plan
that meme is lame and played
dont announce
just do it
childish last word crap doesnt work
you just dont see it = we all see it
lawfag here
this is a follow up to a case where scotus ruled companies CAN put waivers of class action suits in their consumer contracts
now scotus rules employers CAN do the same
what i say a class action?
anons RBG may be on the right side of this one…
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-21/fk-you-unions-supreme-court-protects-workplace-arbitration-contracts
In what will likely be remembered as an epic middle finger to America's unions, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Monday - in a decision split along ideological lines - that businesses can force employees into individual arbitration to resolve disputes, virtually eliminating the threat of a class-action lawsuit.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the decision "egregiously wrong". She argued that individual complaints can be very small in dollar terms, or "scarcely of a size warranting the expense of seeking redress alone." The justice read a summary of her dissent aloud in the court.
In a comment that broke with the administration's official view, the National Labor Relations Board argued that requiring employees to waive their right to collective action conflicted with national labor laws. Bodies representing business were united in support of the ruling.
Meanwhile, lower courts had been split over the issue. Two rulings had been issued - two in which appeals courts ruled that such agreements can’t be enforced and a third in which the appeals court said they are valid.
According to the New York Times, the Court had ruled back in 2011 during the AT&T Mobility V. Concepcion case that companies could forbid class actions in contracts with consumers. These contracts typically require two things: That disputes be resolved and claims brought through arbitration.
The justices were asked to determine whether these same conditions apply to employees.
dont be a jackass
the law is not clear as written
that is why lower courts split
congress is so fucked up they dont even write the laws
if you were a lawfag you would not just how much
all you pro lifers have been lied to
this is such a non issue but worse than that it is a DIVISIVE issue
what does that tell you?
use logic
early termination ok
late term not ok
done
sometimes when i m on my computer typing it is like the whole universe is getting it
Does this make sense to anyone, anyone out there anyone
hello?