Why is Newsom's wife labelling such a serious matter as 'funny'?
And why won't she tell the truth but instead list a bunch of maybe's?
Because you morons can't help but commit the no true scotsman fallacy.
The fact you're here trying to reconcile your inner contradictions is proof enough, mossad faggot.
Tick tock.
Nope, life isn't a 1 hour episode of Law & Order, and reality does not operate according to your personal 'patience' level.
It took 10 years to bring down Capone.
This is the takedown of a 12,000 year old death cult that had infiltrated the world's entire notion of the meaning of 'information'.
You dumb fucks are just screechers while the world is purged of the evil.
The wheels of justice turn slow, but they're powerful.
Hope the money was worth it, demon.
Because he's a goddamn Satanist, that's why.
No it isn't a 'valid complaint'.
Bottom to top.
Step by step.
World can't be completely destroyed.
Evil infiltrated government.
The world is connected.
The arrests have only just STARTED. Clinesmith, Sussman, Dachenko….
See, here's what you idiots are intentionally omitting.
Those guys you're talking about who are 'corrupt criminals'?
Imagine they are mere pawns where the chain of command is global.
How do you get to the top and ensure you have evidence?
You use the 'rolls on' method, under secrecy, building a case over time and you have to get it right the first and only time, first time in human history.
This is a world criminal syndicate that sacrifices children to moloch.
Multiple country's entire military intelligence powers are needed to take this syndicate down.
And you're talking about a fucking sheriff in jerkwater usa?
YOUR 'it's a valid complaint' is what looks like a shill, shill.
This is a site for grownups, not short term fish memory morons who lived a life of short term gratifications so long that it's all you fucking know.
When there is ONE source that starts a story, and then multiple news orgs repeat it, that doesn't mean multiple independent sources, it just means everyone's repeating the same initial story.
In Living Color
I never said it's wrong to say they should be in jail.
I said it's wrong to shill that they should all be in jail NOW before the airtight cases are built, where an absence of them being in jail now is somehow evidence the plan is failing.
Not sure why you're engaging with me