PB

>>14957589

>You must be a newfag.

>You cant site the cabals propaganda aka MSM as sauce.

>Lurk moar moran.

I cited interviews wherein Trump expressly endorsed the death jabs. The venue where the interview was broadcast is irrelevant.

After Trump neglected his duties as CIC when the country was technically under military assault (elections are infrastructure), he walked away and threw his base to the wolves. Then he told us death jabs are great and recommended we take them. Moreover, he lied about taking the jabs. He isn't stupid. He knows what they're doing to people. The only logical conclusion is that he was never /ourguy/. He is a traitor and enemy of the people. His only function now is to keep the people docile, waiting for his return, which is never going to come.

But hey, if you want to follow retarded hivemindthink and bump hopium all day long, then you do you. Free country and all.

>>14958059

>trust the plan

The only plan is to finish dismembering America like a cow in a meatpacking plant. But hey, if you are hallucinating indications to the contrary, I guess I might as well just humor you. Enjoy your fantasies while they last.

>>14958094

Now THAT is a meme.

Stolen.

>>14958102

>Our own military is now the enemy of the people.

The U.S. military is not one monumental unitary structure. Comped for sure, like everything, but not 100%.

How many deer hunters are there in America?

If a heavy orb is hanging from a high ceiling and you want to make it fall, do you unload on the orb itself, or do you employ your brain and use accuracy and precision?

How have past revolutions been won? By conventional (as opposed to asymmetrical) means?

What is the distinction between violence and force?

What is the most powerful word in existence?

>>14958118

>Are we waiting until they remove any patriots from the military until they have gamer soy boys at the helm of thousands of drones.

Nice to see someone using his brian for a change around here.

Here's another factor. We can't get the election fraud rectified, or any of the corruption rooted out, with the legal system comped as it is. Trump used to boast about all the judges he appointed. And what has been the benefit to the legal system of all those appointments? Fuck all. All of it hopelessly, interdependently, inter-reinforcingly corrupt.

>>14958142

>l am shocked by the lack of real interesting and encouraging entertainment.

Perhaps it is time to consider questioning the very value and purpose of entertainment. Maybe even time to forgo entertainment altogether. The world becomes a lot more interesting, and your mind a lot cleaner and clearer, if you do.

>>14958144

>ALWAYS APPLY THE TENTH MAN PRINCIPLE.

Assumes you've got ten people in on the planning…

Or maybe one could train to be one's own tenth man.

>>14958178

Anymore, this board is where any critical thinker is denounced as a shill.

>Trump stated that the republic was under attack.

>Trump was commander-in-chief.

>Trump walked away and left the republic to be raped and devoured by its attackers.

>Trump explicitly endorsed and recommended the clot shot.

>Ergo, Trump is in league with our enemies.

This argument could be wrong, but it is logical. It could be missing insights, but even if it is, I have yet to see anyone here present them. No, all anons can seem to do is REEEE shill.

The only impetus to come here anymore is to save time ascertaining just doomed we are by scanning the notables. That and the memes.

Trump betrayed us. Q was a pacification op. If you wanna REEEE shill, well, that's what you're gonna do. If you have a logical refutation, I'd love to see it.

>>14958233

Exactly my point. Never a reasoned reply. Just shill REEEings and unintelligible bullshit.

Trump is laughing at us up his sleeve.

>>14958250

>What do you do against an invisible enemy?

Hm. Walk away and let it continue to attack and destroy?

>Do you arrest most of the pharma system, the fake news media and bankers?

Haven't they committed enough crimes to justify it? At any rate, do you just retreat to your resort and issue feckless statements that do nothing but keep your followers hoping you will make a comeback and fix things?

>What do you think would have happened if POTUS did this at that point?

I imagine a lot of hell would have broken loose. Would it have been worse than the hell we are now tumbling over the precipice into? I don't know.

>Can you even act like that as a CEO of a golden corporation?

Admittedly I don't know enough about the legal system(s) to answer that.

But I do think that there was ZERO strategic necessity or value for Trump to lie about getting clot shots and recommending that the people take them.

I also find Trump's cheerfulness and Q's silence highly suspect during a time when millions face the prospect of starving or freezing to death, even if they succumb to the pressure to take jabs that Trump inexplicably went out of his way to endorse.

Occam's razor is not a universally applicable tool, but I'd say this situation qualifies for its application. If the enemy were a duck, I'd say Trump looks, walks, and quacks like it. The greatest irony of all time is that anons have become the NPCs that they ridicule in their diminishingly dank memes.

>>14958310

>So you believe Biden is real?

Define real.

>When the majority of the population thinks you are Hitler 2.0

After the massive Trump rallies and all the election fraud, do you honestly believe that?

>You don't know that.

I didn't say I know. I said I think it.

>The left says "Trump followers follow Drumpf whatever he says". The left says "Drumpf followers are against the vaxx because Drumpf bad".

I've seen this argument. Do a cost-benefit analysis on that as a strategy. When people's lives are at stake, and Trump's endorsements reinforce Bidan's murderous and illegal policies, it makes absolutely zero sense. Trump could have just refused to comment on the vaccines. He was under no obligation to make any sort of public statement on them whatsoever. He gave them glowing publicity and lied about having taken them himself. I can no longer trust Trump on that one issue alone.

>>14958351

>So you wouldn't take it when the corrupt pharma system tells you, and Bidan tells you and the fake news tell you.

>But when after all of that POTUS recommends it, THEN you would take it?

>Why? That doesn't make sense at all.

First, if even some quasi-normies (peeps on the fence) are swayed by Trump's death jab endorsement, and are harmed by it, that is unacceptable to me. I'm not just considering MAGA peeps.

Second, as I pointed out, Trump's endorsement reinforces Bidan's murderous vax policies.

Third, as I pointed out, Trump could have just remained mute on the subject and let those who are inclined to think for themselves do so. Wu wei. Clean karma. Trump endorsed a death jab. No way around it.

For what it's worth, I appreciate your effort to have a real conversation about this. All the shill REEEing around here is contemptible. My hat is off to you.

>>14958497

>It destroys fake news fake narratives

I can somewhat see your reasoning up to this point. The most damaging fake news narrative that we're dealing with at this juncture is, "You must trust the science. The vaxxes are safe and effective." How does Trump corroborating this fake news narrative destroy it? Sure, it might convince some normies who are deluded into thinking vaxxes are good to think more favorably of Trump, but at the same time, it reinforces their pro-vaxx delusion. So I do not find this to be a cogent argument.

>>14958568

>If you already believe in it, you are ALREADY lost and POTUS recommending it won't change a thing.

>If you WANT to kill yourself, there is no real way stopping you.

So again, why shouldn't Trump just withhold comment and let the chips fall where they may? Put it this way. If I was a figure of his stature, and I knew that the jabs were deadly, and I thought that endorsing them (while in the process lying about personally having taken them) would lead to even one unnecessary death (cost analysis), then I would have to see an overwhelmingly powerful benefit to offset that cost. Optics don't cut it. Trump lied about taking the death jab and endorsed it. That is proactive evil. He could have just kept his mouth shut and let the cookie crumble. He didn't.