MM is a mole. As long as he remains close to DJT,
the country will never recover .
>Trump has the vision and the wisdom to get us to where we're trying to get
In a holding cell with 600 others?
They're not doing it to him, they're doing it to conservatives. The goal is get conservatives to react when Kyle is executed on the street. The confiscation of guns will happen after the war.
NWO warlocks did not come this far to allow the second amendment to get in the way of the ultimate goal.
Massive FF after Rittenhouse is acquitted will trigger White House EOs and mandates that make it impossible to acquire ammunition. The EO and/or legislation will once again ban semi auto rifles and large capacity magazines. Once that is complete, FF involving handguns will be extreme in occurrence. A state of emergency will be declared and the Constitution will be amended to severely cripple gun ownership.
just…stop. Q was a disinfo agent and Trump, Lindell, Giuliani, Byrne , CM and everyone here were the useful idiots.
>can use firearms to secure property but not use deadly force
This is correct. There is noaw anywhere that gives a land owner the right to kill someone on their land who is not posing a valid threat.
Proving they were a threat is difficult
No law anywhere
>(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
>(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
>(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
>(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
See. Only if necessary
The law is clear. You cannot just shoot someone for wandering on your property - in any state
>Notice how the other anon only quotes the parts he likes…
You mean the parts you don't like because it destroys your position
It is illegal to shoot someone just wandering on your property in any state. You MUST have justifiable cause
Nobody will find any law contradicting this
That's fine, but the argument is whether or not you can kill someone JUST for wandering on your land; you cannot.