>>1496916

Probably because there's never been (that I've seen) a coherent explanation of what it is, exactly, you think you're seeing.

Pretty sure there's like 5 individuals WW that 'get it' - and at least 2 of those 5 are rain man-esque savants….

Concise descriptions might help - but a bunch of highlighted text and a few arrows, clarity does not make…

>>1497288

Sorry, still makes no sense to me.

Don't take that as denigrating what you see - I just apparently don't think the way you do so it's just … numbers and random dates.