>>14968366 (pb)

Something else I've noticed in this trial. The kid gives pretty much straight forward answers, now, compare that to the answers, or, NON answers, given in congressional hearings, by corrupt assholes from big corps. Amazing how greatly they vary, is it not? Why is that?

>>14968725

Question: Does this kid, have a right to protect himself, regardless of his age? The prosecutor seems to be trying to push the idea that the kid should not have been able to possess a weapon. If so, then is he suggesting that ONLY adults have the right to defend themselves?

>>14968789

Agree.