"do a terror" memeclown, as we are all already designated as terrorist and domestic violent extremists by the CDC, FBI/DHS, and 'criminals' by vaxxlord ring bearer Albert Bourla, EVRYTHING we "do' is a "terror".

You cannot be 'more terrorist' by taking any additional specific actions, fellow terrorists. that meme is clown submission programming. We are ALREADY tagged as the worst type of offender in US and MIL law- terrorists.

They will execute us if we lose, no matter what our weapon- speech, keyboard, meme, etc…

>>14970225

still waiting for justice to change from just us…

>>14970477

>>14970310

>>14970523

>the constitution

where is the evidence that that is the ENFORCED 'Law of the Land'?

would be a nice 'christmas gift' tho

>>14970604

how is paper evidence of enforced law?

someanon recently posted a letter he sent to local occificals/IRS going line by line on lost or unenforced Constitutional Protections and Amended additions.

Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Only true with action.

anon's child thinks they are their favorite cartooon character. they draw it and write it. But are they?

https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

The Retraction Watch Leaderboard

Who has the most retractions? Here’s our unofficial list (see notes on methodology), which we’ll update as more information comes to light:

Yoshitaka Fujii (total retractions: 183) See also: Final report of investigating committee, our reporting, additional coverage

Joachim Boldt (159) See also: Editors-in-chief statement, our coverage

Yoshihiro Sato (106) See also: our coverage

Ali Nazari (85) See also: our coverage

Jun Iwamoto (82) See also: our coverage

Diederik Stapel (58) See also: our coverage

Yuhji Saitoh (53) See also: our coverage

Adrian Maxim (48) See also: our coverage

Chen-Yuan (Peter) Chen (43) See also: SAGE, our coverage

Fazlul Sarkar (41) See also: our coverage

Shahaboddin Shamshirband (41) See also: our coverage

Hua Zhong (41) See also: journal notice

Shigeaki Kato (40) See also: our coverage

James Hunton (37) See also: our coverage

Hyung-In Moon (35) See also: our coverage

Antonio Orlandi (34) See also: our coverage

Amelec Viloria aka Jesus Silva (33) See also: our coverage

Jan Hendrik Schön (32) See also: our coverage

Dimitris Liakopoulos (31) (NB: We’re counting a book he co-authored as a single retraction. The book has 13 retracted chapters with DOIs that are not included in this figure.) See also: our coverage

Naoki Mori (31) See also: our coverage

Jose L Calvo-Guirado (30) See also: our coverage

Soon-Gi Shin (30) See also: our coverage

Bharat Aggarwal (29) See also: our coverage

Victor Grech (29) See also: our coverage

Tao Liu (29) See also: our coverage

Cheng-Wu Chen (28) See also: our coverage

A Salar Elahi (27) See also: our coverage

Prashant K Sharma (27) See also: our coverage

Richard L E Barnett (26) See also: our coverage

Dalibor Petkovic (25) See also: our coverage

Scott Reuben (25) See also: our coverage

We note that all of the top 31 are men, which agrees with the general findings of a 2013 paper suggesting that men are more likely to have papers retracted for fraud.

Notes:

Many accounts of the John Darsee story cite 80-plus retractions, which would place him third on the list, but Web of Science only lists 17, three of which are categorized as corrections. That’s not the only discrepancy. For example, Fujii has 138 retractions listed in Web of Science, compared to 183 as recommended by a university committee, while Reuben has 24, compared to the 22 named in this paper. We know that not everything ends up in Web of Science — Chen, for example, isn’t there at all — so we’ve used our judgment based on covering these cases to arrive at the highest numbers we could verify.

Shigeaki Kato is likely to end up with 43 retractions, based on the results of a university investigation.

All of this is a good reminder why the database we’ve built with the generous support of the MacArthur Foundation and Arnold Foundation will be useful.