dChan
Anonymous ID: 28a013 Nov. 12, 2021, 6:27 a.m. No.14982120   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2160

>>14981688

>>14982076

 

To make a long story short, I came to the conclusion that the oldest portions of the Great Sphinx, what I refer to as the core-body, must date back to an earlier period (at least 5000 BCE, andmy latest research now points to the end of the last ice age, circa 10,000 BCE),a time when the climate was very different and included more rain.

 

Many people have said to me that the Great Sphinx cannot be so old, in part because the head is evidently a dynastic Egyptian head and the dynastic period did not start until about 3000 BCE. In fact, if you look at the current Great Sphinx you may notice that the head is actually too small for the body. It is clear to me that the current head is not the original head. The original head would have become severely weathered and eroded. It was later re-carved, during dynastic times, and in the re-carving it naturally became smaller. Thus, the head of the Great Sphinx is not the original head. In fact, the Sphinx may not have originally been a sphinx at all. It is possible it was a lion – actually the latest evidence suggests it was originally a lioness.

 

https://www.robertschoch.com/sphinx.html

 

The Great Sphinx: She was the Lioness Mehit who Guarded an Ancient Archive

 

One of the attendees at the conferences was our colleague and friend, Dr. Manu Seyfzadeh (a dermatologist with a passion for ancient Egypt), who privately revealed to us an amazing discovery he had made:hieroglyphic evidencedating back to earliest dynastic times that apparently refers to the Great Sphinx andan archive under the Sphinx.At Dr. Seyfzadeh’s invitation, Robert Bauval and I joined him as coauthors on a scholarly paper describing this discovery which was, after being peer-reviewed, published in a journal devoted to archaeology (Manu Seyfzadeh, Robert M. Schoch, and Robert Bauval, 2017, “A New Interpretation of a Rare Old Kingdom Dual Title: The King’s Chief Librarian and Guardian of the Royal Archives of Mehit”, Archaeological Discovery, vol. 5, pp. 163-177). This new discovery, summarized here, reinforces the conclusion that the origins of the Great Sphinx date back to a remote time prior to dynastic Egypt (as John Anthony West and I have espoused since the early 1990s).

 

https://www.robertschoch.com/mehit.html