fatter attendants means fewer passengers. GREAT business model. PCness triumphs over profitability.
> It creates a strong positive charge in the ionosphere
the solar wind contains equal amounts of protons and electrons, dumbass, otherwise the sun would become negatively charged.
they are simply dissociated from one another, as opposed to combined in atoms.
you are getting sleepy, very sleepy, you're eyelids are so heavy you can't keep them open….
now gimme $500
>When you think you're bright, but announce to the world that you're not.
ffs, learn a little REAL high school level physics before you post absolute bullshit
https://nkusa.org/
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67860-3#auth-2
how many peer review journal articles proclaiming the safety and efficacy of the clotshot would you like me to post?
The solar wind is a stream of charged particles released from the upper atmosphere of the Sun, called the corona. This plasma mostly consists of electrons, protons and alpha particles with kinetic energy between 0.5 and 10 keV. The composition of the solar wind plasma also includes a mixture of materials found in the solar plasma: trace amounts of heavy ions and atomic nuclei such as C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe. There are also rarer traces of some other nuclei and isotopes such as P, Ti, Cr, 54Fe and 56Fe, and 58Ni, 60Ni, and 62Ni.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind
https://www.britannica.com/search?query=solar+wind
next time, try using some COMMON FUCKING SENSE, jackass.
>Believe NOTHING in mainstream science publishing.
believe NOTHING coming from tards who lump entire populations into a single statement.
>How long is this stupid Mask War going to continue?
as long as there are sheeple STILL wearing them VOLUNTARILY, and shaming others for not, to boot.
>We are obviously not talking the entire body of scientists.
but that is exactly what you wrote. maybe back off the asinine hyperbole, and be more specific?
buy a mirror, tard.
and to answer your rhetorical question, yes, you DID call me names and insult me. the difference is you did it in a passive-aggressive fashion, like the hypocritical two-faced coward that you are. i prefer honesty and directness. so GFY, faggot.
GFY, pretentious asswipe. i have more peer review publication than you will ever have. i know there is BS out there. i warn my students repeatedly to check the source of funding on any paper before they blindly believe it. but i also know that 99.999% of peer review articles are honest science done by honest scientists. you simply have NO CLUE what the actual volume of scientific publication is, or you wouldn't make such asinine statements based on a handful of paid-for fake results.