>>15185768

(Please read from the start)

>> Will I be shocking the reader if I said that Aramaic language is Phoenician language? If you want to understand me better, just take a look at how English was spoken and written during the time Shakespeare lived and compare it to the English we speak and write now. If I take this idea and apply it, I say the Phoenician language was like the English back during the time of Shakespeare, while Aramaic language is like the Middle English. There is a slight difference, some call it an evolution, but I call it a mutation which comes with time and younger generations. But there is no doubt for me that Aramaic is Phoenician Language. While modern day Hebrew is certainly a mutated “branch” of Phoenician language = Hebrew deviated from its origin: the Phoenician language. While Aramaic is like a softer Phoenician language. There are lot of identical things between Aramaic and Phoenician language. How should I explain this? It’s like Phoenician language is the old shape of the language, while the Aramaic is the newer shape of the language, but it’s the same language. It’s the same with the Old French = Français Ancient and the modern day French = Français moderne. To understand me better, I’m putting as an example a sentence I’ve found on the net written in Old English (1), Middle English (2), Early Modern English (3) and Modern English (4). The situation between Phoenician and Aramaic is identical to this situation with the English language. While with Hebrew it deviated from its origin = Phoenician. I hope now things are clear.

“A set of related bynames include the Aramaic rmn, Old South Arabic rmn, Hebrew rmwn, and Akkadian Rammānu ("Thunderer"), presumably originally vocalized as Ramān in Aramaic and Hebrew. The Hebrew spelling rmwn with Masoretic vocalization Rimmôn is identical with the Hebrew word meaning 'pomegranate' and may be an intentional misspelling and parody of the original.”

>> Anyone noticed how (((they))) “inserted” the Jews in what we are talking about again? = the cult of Hadad, a Phoenician deity. Amazing, isn’t it anons? Mostly how (((they))) redirect your thoughts towards Judaism and the Jews each time we are talking about anything concerning the Phoenicians.

“The word Hadad-rimmon, for which the inferior reading Hadar-rimmon is found in some manuscripts in the phrase "the mourning of (or at) Hadad-rimmon", has been a subject of much discussion. According to Jerome and all the older Christian interpreters, the mourning is for something that occurred at a place called Hadad-rimmon (Maximianopolis) in the valley of Megiddo. The event alluded to was generally held to be the death of Josiah (or, as in the Targum, the death of Ahab at the hands of Hadadrimmon). But even before the discovery of the Ugaritic texts some suspected that Hadad-rimmon might be a dying-and-rising god like Adonis or Tammuz, perhaps even the same as Tammuz, and the allusion could then be to mournings for Hadad such as those which usually accompanied the Adonis festivals. T. K. Cheyne pointed out that the Septuagint reads simply Rimmon, and argues that this may be a corruption of Migdon (Megiddo), in itself a corruption of Tammuz-Adon. He would render the verse, "In that day there shall be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of the women who weep for Tammuz-Adon" (Adon means "lord"). No further evidence has come to light to resolve such speculations.”

>> Here you go anons, another attempt to link a Thunder deity to the Evil One. Are you starting to see the pattern of how the experts twist themselves backward and juggle their way into explaining the connection between Yahweh and the Phoenician culture? How many times did we see this in this thread, no matter what the subject is we are talking about, whenever it’s about the Phoenicians and their culture, the Jews and Yahweh is glued to it as a parasitic entity trying to mimic the Phoenicians.

• Page 1 698 –

>>15188035

(Please read from the start)

When we take note of every single time Yahweh is compared to this and that….you will notice those characteristics he supposedly has, contradict one another. Which makes it impossible for one deity to have so many contradictory characteristics in the same time. Like what you may ask? Well, let’s take as an easy example of him being sometimes portrayed as a drought deity = infertile land, and sometimes he is portrayed as storm/rain deity = fertile land. Sure, the ThunderBirds could cause drought = as in stop rain from falling if they want to punish, but we are not talking about the drought cause by the lack of rain here. We are talking about the unfertile type of soil which we cannot use to plant in, like the desert sand. I just wanted to make that last point clear for the reader, because each time I’m talking about Yahweh bringing drought, I’m not saying he is stopping the rain so there is drought. I’m saying the type of soil he represent is not good for crops, like the desert sand; it’s the type of soil which nothing grows in even if you irrigate it. And this is incredibly symbolic because this is projecting his inability to have children or it’s hard for him to have children = pointing to the McLeod Syndrome.

Yahweh is also represented by fire (the element of the Evil One), which is in pure contradiction with what a storm is = lightning, thunder, rain and wind. Those are just 2 simple examples I’ve given anons.

And yes, Adonis is a mutated form of the Evil One’s cult, an aspect of him, mostly centered around his death and supposed resurrection = the cycle of nature. His love relationship with Ishtar/Aphrodite is a projection to the love story of the Evil Couple. His cult trickled into Phoenicia at a later date, just like the cult of the Evil Lady did. Don’t forget that the Evil One was also a Lord = a Baal because he was a Sebetti ruler.

“Sanchuniathon

In Sanchuniathon's account Hadad is once called Adodos, but is mostly named Demarûs. This is a puzzling form, probably from Ugaritic dmrn, which appears in parallelism with Hadad, or possibly a Greek corruption of Hadad Ramān. Sanchuniathon's Hadad is son of Sky by a concubine who is then given to the god Dagon while she is pregnant by Sky. This appears to be an attempt to combine two accounts of Hadad's parentage, one of which is the Ugaritic tradition that Hadad was son of Dagon. The cognate Akkadian god Adad is also often called the son of Anu ("Sky"). The corresponding Hittite god Teshub is likewise son of Anu (after a fashion).

In Sanchuniathon's account, it is Sky who first fights against Pontus ("Sea"). Then Sky allies himself with Hadad. Hadad takes over the conflict but is defeated, at which point unfortunately no more is said of this matter. Sanchuniathion agrees with Ugaritic tradition in making Muth, the Ugaritic Mot, whom he also calls "Death", the son of El.”

>> Just by reading this it’s obvious whomever wrote the Sanchuniathon, copied or translated it to Greek language was terribly confused and mixed things up. You cannot make heads or tails of this story and they said it themselves: it’s as if they are trying to merge to tales of the parenting of Hadad into one story. See how mutations happen when the younger generation misunderstands what the ancestors wrote?

• Page 1 699 –

>>15188059

(Please read from the start)

“Hadad in the Bible

In the Bible, Hadad is referenced multiple times as a god worshipped by non-believers of Yahweh, the god of the Israelites.”

>> Yup! This is a zillion percent true. The people worshiping Hadad don’t believe in Yahweh or worship him because he is on the opposite side of their Thunder deity. In other words; it’s about the Clan of the Light versus the Clan of the Darkness. Wanna have a guess which is which?

“In the Book of Exodus, the Israelites worshiped a false idol in the shape of a golden calf and they called it "El (God) the Bull" which is connected to the term Elohim meaning Lord of the Israelites in the ancient Hebrew language. In this manner, the Israelites appropriate to Hadad - the reverence that was previously given to Yahweh. Hadad is associated with bulls which shows a relationship between the false idol of the Israelites and Hadad. It is implied if not outright stated that the false idol is in fact Hadad. Hadad is characterized and seen as a god who wants the same power and authority that the God of the Israelites holds in Judeo-Christianity.”

>> LoL! I’ve got tears in my eyes out of laughter. This is one of the best paragraphs I’ve ever read in Wikipedia. The BULL from Moses fairytale is the Lamassu clan. Neith settled with surviving warriors from all the clan in Ancient Egypt, this included Apis = a male warrior from the Lamassu clan. The Lamassu warriors were from both genders. And the cult of Neith in any form of her was dominant in Ancient Egypt, mostly in the early times, including the early dynasties. It’s much later that her cult weakened and we saw the cult of Seth getting stronger and co-existed with the cult of Horus. See the Rameside dynasty to understand what I mean there.

Yes anons, Hadad and Yahweh are mortal enemies. This is a projection to the ancient battle between the ThunderBirds and the Horned Serpents. Yahweh is the Lord of Horned Serpent Clan = the Evil Clan. While the Thunder wielding Birds of Prey = I’m call them ThunderBirds, are one of the Royal guards of Atlantis, the warriors of the Crown Prince Clan. The ThunderBirds are the ones protecting the carrier of the Light = the new King of kings = the young Crown Prince of Atlantis. We also see this conflict between the ThunderBirds and the Horned Serpents in the legends of the Native Americans. In Ancient Egypt, we have the multi-morph Seth, a warrior of the Horned Serpent Clan, fighting another ThunderBird = Horus.

With the Native American legends, there is no association between the Bull = Lamassu clan and the Birds of Prey = ThunderBirds. This is because Neith = the Sebetti ruler of the Lamassu Clan was geographically located in Ancient Egypt = very far away from Northern America. It’s unclear if there were some = a few Lamassu warriors in Norther America, but…I haven’t finished looking in that part, I’ve entered this labyrinth I’m in right now via the ThunderBirds tunnel, and I’m going to go out and return to the Native Americans via the ThunderBirds as well. We are talking about them right now and will talk about them more in this part of this section since they are the Clan of the Crown Prince. For now, I’m saying that we don’t have any association, so far, between the Native American ThunderBirds and the Lamassu clan because Neith was not in that region = part of the world, but she was in Ancient Egypt. It’s in that place and in Phoenicia/Canaan that we have a close association/connection between the ThunderBirds, Lightning and the Lamassu Clan. It’s because Neith, the mother, was located in Ancient Egypt and the Crown Prince, the child was located in Phoenicia. And they made contact after the Cataclysm.

• Page 1 700 –