>>15181408

(Please read from the start)

>> Here, it’s a salad, pure spaghetti. One moment you feel like Baal is the Crown Prince, one moment you feel like he is the Evil One. We have death of a Sebetti king, beastiality, cannibalism, pedovore, the Evil Lady taking action and amazingly, somehow the Lamassu clan is involved in all of this = plays a role. I don’t think we should take this paragraph word to word.

The Lamassu clan plays a role twice here. Once with a substitute for Baal with the calf. I don’t think here we should take it word to word but this actually and strangely echoes what we read from Ancient Egypt with Isis/Hathor/Neith taking baby Horus and fleeing away from Seth and his minions. In the Ugaritic text, it’s not that clear, but I do see the lines behind the myths have in common. And we shouldn’t forget the role Nephthys played with Horus. Then we have “Anat” which should be a mutation of the Evil Lady plays the role that is known for Neith/Isis to played = leading the ThunderBirds’ charge against the Evil Clan and killing the Evil One. I think here, there is confusion and merger between the 2 female Sebetti rulers. I’ve talked about this merger quiet a lot already in this thread and how the Universal Queen = the Queen of queens was confused and mixed by the minds of the younger generation with the queen of monsters = the Evil Lady. This is due because both are founding mothers of each side = Light and Darkness.

And of course, it’s due to the fact that the Evil Lady wanted to be the Queen of queens and take her mother’s place – she must have given herself that title during the coup and kept it after it while she never was the Queen of queens. Sometimes, it gets confusing, doesn’t it? It’s not easy to see through this. Do not also forget that both Sebetti queens are the rulers of a horned clan; which adds more to the confusion.

Also did anyone notice how they said here that the Earth remained “CRACKED” even after the defeat of Mot and the recognition of Baal as king? This reminds me of how the earth literally cracked and splitter between Egypt/Africa and the Arabian Peninsula; creating the Red Sea. This fits perfectly with the geological finds we have found in this thread.

“Seven years later Mot returns and attacks Ba‘al in a battle which ceases only when Shapsh tells Mot that El now supports Ba’al. Thereupon Mot at once surrenders to Ba‘al/Hadad and recognizes Ba‘al as king.”

>7 Years = I wonder what it’s really points to. And I think here, it’s obvious. The battle ends with the rightful Sebetti ruler sitting on the throne of Heaven, which is true. The Evil One was defeated. And we will be talking about this later.

“Hadad in Aram and ancient Israel

In the second millennium BCE, the king of Yamhad or Halab (modern Aleppo) received a statue of Ishtar from the king of Mari, as a sign of deference, to be displayed in the temple of Hadad located in Halab Citadel. The king of Aleppo called himself "the beloved of Hadad".The god is called "the god of Aleppo" on a stele of the Assyrian king Shalmaneser I.”

• Page 1 695 –

>>15185711

(Please read from the start)

>> This paragraph is very important. This is not the first time in this thread we seen evidence of the City-State of Aleppo being Phoenician. We already saw the stele of Incirli on page 1 488; where it’s clearly stated that the king of Assyria asked the Phoenician king of Arwad & Aleppo to sacrifice humans in his honor. There was a law in those cities ruled by this Phoenician king which forbade the practice human sacrifice. But in the same time the Phoenician king didn’t want to offend the powerful Assyrian king and earn his wrath. So the Phoenician king, substituted humans (as requested by the Assyrian king) with animals and preformed the sacrifice to avoid the anger of the powerful king. The Phoenician king replaced humans by animals because he opposed human sacrifice.

Here, we know that since the second millennium B.C. Adad or Hadad was worship in Aleppo = he was the god of Aleppo as in the Patron = protective deity of Aleppo and his temple was located inside of the citadel. They don’t come out and say it out right here, but this is a very clear indication that Aleppo was a Phoenician City-State. The reason this is not explicitly said is because the “experts” have pushed forward a narrative for decades now that the Phoenician City-States were only located on a narrow coast and never formed a civilizations, so the Phoenicians don’t even exist according to them, nor does a Phoenician culture exist. Aleppo and other City-states located “inside” of Syria and Lebanon, like Baalbek, are proof that the Phoenician territory was much bigger than what is admitted = bigger towards the East, the North and the South. But (((they))) don’t want you to know that.

Another important point here is that the king of Mari gifted the statue of Ishtar to the Phoenician king of Aleppo. This is very important. Why?

Well, let’s start by saying that the PRIME deity = chief deity in Aleppo was Hadad = a Thunder wielding god. This was the MAIN and MAJOR cult in Aleppo. Having the temple of Hadad inside the protective walls of the citadel is an indication of the importance of the cult of Hadad. Also, this is indicating that the cult of Ishtar was not dominant at all in Aleppo since it didn’t take the prime spot = temple inside the citadel. There is a possibility for the cult of Ishtart to exist in other places in the City-State of Aleppo; yes, it’s possible, but it’s certain it was not a dominant cult. For the king of Mari to gift the Phoenician king of Aleppo a statue of Ishtar is a way, a method to introduce, slowly her cult in Aleppo. But her cult couldn’t replace or overtake the cult of Hadad in Aleppo since he was the major deity there. Her cult must have co-existed side by side with the cult of Hadad and when this sort of co-existence happens, it’s easy to see deities merge or have their characteristics switched, transferred, mutated etc.

This indicates the cult of Ishtar was not native to Aleppo but was “brought” there, migrated there, slowly. Of course, I’m not solely relying on this example to come to this conclusion. It’s just a sample I’m providing to anons. Another indication is the geographic location of both city-states. Please take a look at the map I’m attaching with this page. Mari is located on the banks of Euphrates River and to the East of Aleppo.

Remember how I said that the Evil Lady resettled in Mesopotamia and how her cult slowly spread from East to West = from Mesopotamia to Canaan/Phoenicia? And it also trickled down from the Taurus mountain range down into Syria. As I’ve explained before, the Eastern Lebanese mountain range known as Anti-Lebanon played the role of a “shield” up to some point, as it made it hard to cross and with that the cult of the Evil Lady spread was slowed down towards the Beqaa valley and double slowed down by Mount-Lebanon range towards the Phoenician coastal city-states.

• Page 1 696 –

>>15185744

(Please read from the start)

But, this was not the case with Inner Phoenicia, North Phoenicia and South Phoenicia = because there was no natural barrier to slow the spread of the cult of the Evil Lady in those area, her cult reached the Phoenician city-states in those areas earlier and spread wider. What we see right now with Aleppo is an example of the “earlier” spread of her cult towards the West. While look when it reached the City-State of Sidon (protected by the mountain barrier) = her cult slowed down and reached that place quiet late and wasn’t as wide spread as it was in the areas with no natural barrier.

All of this is ONE example out of MANY in the area. If anons study a bunch of them, they will find a repeated action of the cult of the Evil Lady slowly trickling from East to West, entering faster the areas of the North and South of Phoenicia because there was no natural barrier to slow the spread. This is a study which will lead anons to discover a pattern and they will also find the routes = paths of the spread and how it MOSTLY coincides with trade and migrant routes. The flows goes from East to West as in the transfer was MOSTLY in one direction = from Mesopotamia towards Phoenicia.

Again, I’m only providing a sample, an example for anons. The study is much bigger than this, I’m not relying on one example to say those words. I’m also attaching some pictures of Mari for anons. I want to draw attention to the layout of the city = the general shape/design of the city of Mari = it’s round, circular. And this is highly important. Anyone keeping track of ancient sites worldwide with perfectly circular shaped structures, rooms, buildings or layouts of cities? What is this indicating? Think about it for now.

“The element Hadad appears in a number of theophoric names borne by kings of the region. Hadad son of Bedad, who defeated the Midianites in the country of Moab, was the fourth king of Edom. Hadadezer ("Hadad-is-help"), the Aramean king defeated by David. Later Aramean kings of Damascus seem to have habitually assumed the title of Ben-Hadad, or son of Hadad, just as a series of Egyptian monarchs are known to have been accustomed to call themselves sons of Ammon. An example is Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram whom Asa, king of Judah, is said to have employed to invade the northern Kingdom of Israel. In the 9th or 8th century BCE, the name of Ben-Hadad 'Son of Hadad', king of Aram, is inscribed on his votive basalt stele dedicated to Melqart, found in Bredsh, a village north of Aleppo. A Hadad was also the seventh of the twelve sons of Ishmael.”

• Page 1 697 –