>>15290526

(Please read from the start)

This should go to every person from all the nationalities, but mostly the Lebanese, since we are talking about the Kamouh. Your behavior shows = projects whom you are. If you act dirty and nasty, it means you are dirty and nasty on the inside. The only monuments that were vandalized and I didn’t feel bad about it was that of Albert Pike and the Georgia stones. It’s not right to say this, but darn it, when I saw those 2 vandalized; I felt better.

I hope the people of Lebanon in general and the people of Hermel specifically will get the proper education to make them respect their national monuments. The authorities and the people in charge in Hermel should work on this A.S.A.P.

Something said in this paragraph is important = the Kamouh was built on a hill top, in a very strategic place. As I’ve said before, I’ve been there twice. And I stood at that hill top and I looked back at the Beqaa valley. You can see for many kilometers around. And when I turned to the North-East (approximately) you can see inside of Syria, beyond the border.

The notable and strategic location of the Kamouh put us in the mindset of it being a geographical marker = as in this being some type of milestone or a territorial marker informing the traveler it reached a specific location. We also think it has built on that hill top to be seen from far away; which enables travelers to get directions and know where they are while traveling. The decoration on the outer walls of the Kamouh is there to indicate that we reached a certain territory = a milestone telling us we reached hunting territory. But we couldn’t figure out to which civilization built this. Despite some similarities with the Mesopotamian civilizations, there aren’t any indications helping us to be a 100% certain about the Kamouh identity.

This is what we used to think the Kamouh is = some type of geographical marker to indicate a territory and in the same time a marker to guide travelers during their journey. Double function.

“Shepherd Neolithic archaeological site

Evidence was found of a Shepherd Neolithic archaeological site in the area around the monument, on the south and west of the hill. The site was discovered and a collection of flint tools used during the Neolithic Revolution was made by Lorraine Copeland and Frank Skeels in 1965. Materials recovered included blade-butts with scraping edges or notches, borers, cores (one with a twin edge) and small flakes. Some pieces were vaguely bifacial. The flints found were in a grey or chocolate-brown colour with some having a shiny patina.”

>> Makes you wonder how old the site is and whom really lived there, doesn’t it?

As if the Kamouh wasn’t a riddle of its own, there is also another mystery on the decoration. There is no question what we see on the outer walls of the Kamouh are hunting scenes and the description given just earlier about them is correct. Along with the animals, we also see weapons, like spears and hunting gears, like the nets (pointing to them with green arrows – picture in next page. What no one can understand or is able to correctly identify what it is in the first place, is the object that I’ve put in red rectangles.

• Page 1 746 –

>>15295021

(Please read from the start)

We know it’s something used as some type of weapon or something used in hunting, since it’s a hunting scene after all. But what is it exactly? It looks like there is some type of rod and something is wrapped around it. Of course this is not certain, because we don’t know what the heck this is. We’ve never seen anything like it before, so we are uncertain in the suggestions we are proposing. This is a grand mystery.

This was before the Awakening. Now, I see there is another possibility for what this strange object could be.

The Kamouh of Hermel is built without an obvious role/function since it has no windows or a door. It’s built at a strategic location which can be spotted from kilometers away. It’s also built by the same type of stone in which the Pyramids of Giza were built = limestone. Its shape is also very significant. So I’ve been wondering for some time now about the possibility the Kamouh having something to do with Antlantean technology = wireless electricity. The mysterious object on the decoration MIGHT be some type of electromagnet. I’m only saying it’s a possibility.

If this is true = if this turns out to be an electromagnet, then it enhances the chances of the Kamouh being some type of Atlantean device related to electricity. Maybe, part of the electrical grid. Crazy, right? But this still doesn’t solve the riddles of whom built this, whom exactly built this and why in this specific location. If this is truly an electromagnet we see on the decoration, then how can it be used in hunting? So many questions and so many riddles.

Which brings me back to the temple of obelisks in Gebal/Byblos: is this temple, mostly the obelisks, linked to ancient Atlantean technology as well? Is it linked to electricity or is it some sort of device which enables to transfer of spiritual energy? And what about that Menhir like thing, inside the court yart of the temple of Astarte, we see on the bronze coin? I would like to remind anons that Neith lived in Gebal for some time, so did she bring the tech = the knowledge with her and taught it to the people of Gebal? It’s one of the possibilities.

Regardless of which it is = electrical device or spiritual device, one thing is for sure about these 2 monuments in Lebanon = they are giving the smell of being more than what they are, with possibly of being Atlantean technology. Which in turn, this indicates there were Atlanteans living in Phoenicia whom were knowledgeable about such tech.

Since I’m here, I want to add something before I move on to the next evidence. It’s more or less connected to Evidence # 6. This is about a Punic coin on which the map of the Mediterranean Basin is depicted. If the reader think the map is not that accurate. Jesus Christ! Just look where they put the map on the coin. I see it as a miracle they managed to draw anything in that tiny space, drawing a map there. So don’t be picky about how accuratly the map is drawn on the coins. It’s a miracle it’s there. This indicates how good of a navigator were the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians. Such tiny map on the coin makes one wonder if the Phoenicians/Carthaginians discovered the Americas….if this was put in a coin, what did the Carthaginian records/archives contain?

And one last thing I also forgot to mention while taking a look at the L-Shapped temple in Gebal: despite the first temple being destroyed, we still found traces of it = in this case the foundations. In the case of the Temple of Jerusalem, if the first temple really existed, we should have found long ago some traces, any traces of it, similar to what we see with the L-Shapped temple of Gebal. But we didn’t. Now what does that tell you?

• Page 1 747 –