>>15325818

(Please read from the start)

The 6th theme is the winged persons.

I called this theme winged person because we have both genders represented with wings. The influence of the Ancient Egyptian style is very noticeable. We see these winged persons are very active: some look like they are holding weapons, as if it’s a fighting scene, while others gives you the impression it’s a hunting scene. They are portrayed with different types of animals next to them sometimes, this is why I said it might be hunting scenes. It’s also clear these winged persons were decorated with gemstones. Some of the winged persons also wear the Pschent crown = is this pointing to royalty?

Sometimes, we also see them standing on each side of a “tree” or something “floral” while holding what seems to be flowers as well. We have been wondering if these are not lightnings in their hands = rosette flower. And the floral plant we see between them (like picture 2 with this page) is actually that beam of light coming down from the sky, which is depicted in a floral pattern. Just some thoughts there.

Are these the ThunderBirds? Yes, they are.

• Page 1 760 –

>>15331617

(Please read from the start)

In the first 2 ivory with this page, we see a winged person whom seems to be holding a spear in his hand, ready to strike. The Griffin is standing next to this winged person and looking up to him. Whom is this warrior? Is he a ThunderBird? Whom is the Griffin? By that I mean: which royal is this about? From the looks of it, it seems like a ThunderBird is killing a royal here? Could it be in this scene we are seeing the death of the Evil One at the hands of a ThunderBird? It’s possible, isn’t it?

• Page 1 760 – A1

>>15331629

(Please read from the start)

The 7th theme is clearly the ThunderBirds. We have them depicted under Ancient Egyptian Art influence = mostly with the head of Horus. And one is wearing the Pschent crown.While another has the solar disk on top of his head. It’s clear some had gemstones incorporated to them.

With all of the themes we’ve seen, it’s clear there was a high presence of many clan warriors, mostly a high presence of ThunderBirds in Phoenicia. No wonder the Bloodlines wanted to get (((their))) hands on these ivories. Of course the 7 themes I’ve presented for anons are not the only ones for the ivories, there are many other themes out there, but those are the notables. And it’s obvious why.

Also a number of these ivories were found in the region of Arslan Tas in Turkey, as well, but they are still referred to as Nimrod’s Ivories. Making it sound like it’s the only place where such Phoenician ivories were excavated.

I’m not saying randomly that there is a high presence of ThunderBirds in Phoenicia just like that. This is connected to the next evidence, coming next.

• Page 1 761 –

>>15331645

(Please read from the start)

Finally, a Bonus theme: A Sebetti queen, but which one?

This ivory plaque is very notable. It was found in Ugarit and is now in the Museum of Damascus. On it, we can clearly see a winged female deity. She is horned and between her horns there is a spark. Her hairdo is identical to that of Hathor. She is nursing 2 people whom are wearing Ancient Egyptian style of clothing. It is interpreted that this is Athirat or Asherah…another mutated form, aspect of the Evil Lady.

On one hand, we’ve seen this iconography when we were taking a look at Lamashtu (starting page 958) from Mesopotamia, with the bronze Plaque of the Hells (starting page 961). Here, we are certain it’s the Evil Lady depicted on that bronze plaque. On the other hand, we’ve also seen a similar iconography while taking a look at Neith (starting page 1 019) were we have many artifacts depicting her nursing 2 crocodiles, as seen in the third picture I’m attaching with this page.

So which one is it? We have 2 Sebetti queens with similar, almost identical iconography, so which one is it we have on this ivory plaque from Ugarit? What if it was actually both = both Sebetti queens merged because the younger generation misunderstood that we have 2 queens and not one?

My thinking: Neith when she came to face the Evil Lady and stayed in Gebal/Byblos for a while to do so, her cult spread in the entire Levant region where there were Phoenician City-States because they recognized her for whom she really was = the Queen of queens and the mother of the Crown Prince. Family has always been important for the Sebetti Clans.

But this was thousands of years ago. I’m suspecting this goes back to something around 10 000 B.C. if not more. After the Evil Lady was repelled, her cult started to trickle in slowly into the Phoenician territory = if not invasion then infiltration. In the Phoenician City-States where the cult of Neith was already in place for thousands of years, the younger generation suddenly saw a Sebetti queen cult slowly migrating into their city. They thought there was one Sebetti queen, misunderstanding there were actually two of them and one was the enemy of the other. Maybe the traveling priests of the Evil Lady devised this plan on purpose to confuse the younger Phoenicians into believing it’s the same queen they are all worshiping. Done on purpose to slowly infiltrate the cult of Neith and twist it into the cult of the Evil Lady. We’ve already seen the confusion between the cult of the King of kings and the Evil One. Here, it’s the same situation. And slowly the iconography of both Sebetti queens merged and one confusion started to build on top of another confusion. This is how I see the cult of the Evil Lady infiltrating Phoenicia and replacing slowly the cult of Neith = to a point that the much younger generation thought that Astarte was the mother of Baal = the Crown Prince, instead of Neith being that. I hope I explained this well for anons because I know how complicated and hard this is.

And this is how we got this iconography on an ivory plaque from Ugarit, with a mix of the Evil Lady and Ancient Egyptian clothing and hair do. The new cult of the Evil Lady superposed itself on the cult of Neith = calqued it = merging the characteristics and aspects of the 2 deities because the younger generation confused them, thinking they are one person, not 2.

• Page 1 762 –