(Please read from the start)
The veil around her is giving this volume around her head as if some type of sail with winds blowing in it. But we know from standard, stereotyped iconography this is how veils are generally depicted in any iconography of a deity. It’s incredibly hard to sculpt a veil, don’t you think so? So what the sculptor does is reproducing the volume the veil makes when it covers the head of the lady to tell us/ indicate to us she is wearing a veil on her head. And this is the situation with Dea Gravida and why we have the veil so voluminous around her head like that, mostly from the back.
Some of the variants of her design come 2 lumps or should I say buns on each side of her head, right under the veil. We believe this is a Phoenician hairdo because of one artifact found in Spain made by extraordinary craftsmanship. This artifact is known as: “the Lady of Elche”. If anons are interested, they can read about this in the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_of_Elche
The Lady of Elche is represented wearing an “elongated” hat with those discs like bun things on each side of her head. I must admit, this is a weird hairdo. But this type of sculpting is indicating this lady was from the noble class = it costs loads of money to have this type of impeccable sculpting with such refined work and care given to details. It’s insane with details when you look at this artifact up close. Of course no one likes to admit this is Carthaginian or should I say a Carthaginian noble lady…or a noble lady wearing Carthaginian clothing, jewelry and hairdo, including the elongated hat. And where do you think the Carthaginians got this “fashion” from? Just by looking at the “elongated” hat, you can see it came straight from their ancestors = the Phoenicians = at least for the hat part. The jewelry design she is wearing is definitely Carthaginian. So the hat is Phoenician and the jewelry is Carthaginian, then what does it make this lady? Main Stream History doesn’t like to admit it at all but this is most likely a Phoenician/Carthaginian noble lady living in Spain which was a Carthaginian territory during the 4th century B.C.
No one likes to admit this, not openly, and certainly not the “experts” because the Elche lady is projecting how wealthy, refined and sophisticated the Carthaginians were. An image totally different from the barbaric, cruel image projected to us by the Greeks and the Romans about the Carthaginians. So we certainly don’t want them to look like liars and deceitful to the general public, so what do (((they))) do? (((They))) create this entire controversy trying to plant doubts as to the authenticity of this artifact, simply because (((they))) don’t want to admit it’s Carthaginian. I’ve told anons many times before = it’s a mafia in archaeology and it’s controlled by a specific group of paid “experts” whom get their marching orders from (((them))). We know how the system works better than anyone, as well as we know what happens to those whom break the narrative pushed forward by the Bloodlines when it comes to History and Archaeology.
I bet a lot of anons reading this thread immediately thought of princess Leia in her iconic hairdo from Star Wars Saga. And you are right to be reminded of her because the hairdo used in that movie was inspired by the Lady of Elche hairdo, which in turn we think originally came from Phoenicia Motherland because of the hairdo we see on some of Dea Gravida statuettes. It’s the same hairdo with buns on each aide of the head. We think these buns are done like that on purpose to allow the person to wear the elongated hat. Another style is the braided hairdo, which also allows the person to put that elongated hat on his/her head without disturbing the hair fashion. And we see Dea Gravida depicted with both styles = the buns and the braided hair.
-
Page 1 709 –