>>15043444

(Please read from the start)

“The sewer system we found beneath the bathhouse was more suggestive. The sewer was high enough for an adult to stand up inside it. The whole system had been clogged and had gone out of use by the sixth century A.D. The sewer was filled with rubbish of all kinds, including potsherds, coins and animal bones.

In addition, the shallow gutter that ran below and along the line of the sewer was filled with the skeletons of about a hundred babies. Analysis of these remains by physical anthropologists Patricia Smith and Gila Kahila indicated that the infants were newborns, discarded within a day of birth. Analysis of teeth that had not yet erupted revealed bloodstains, indicating that the infants were either strangled or drowned. Because the infant remains were found in the gutter of the sewer, it seems likely that they were intentionally drowned.”

>> Amazing how Smith accepts the analysis of the teeth of these “murdered” children, but refuses that of the buried children in Carthage. Poor kids, thrown like that in the sewer. The mothers didn’t care about them one zit to throw them in that dirty, filthy, bacteria infested place. Here, if we compare how the dead infants were treated after death = tossed into the sewer; and how the Carthaginians treated their dead infants = cremated, buried in urns thena stele was placed on top with a vow = inscription on it while the priest prayed and a religious burial ritual was performed by him. All of the things done to bury the dead infants and children in Carthage are costly anons and in the same time they project the care given by the parents to their dead child. While here, in the bath house, it’s the easiest, nastiest and cheapest way to get rid of an unwanted infant and it projects the lack of care the mother had towards this child since it lived for an extremely short amount of time. The signs of death here are clear = it was premeditated murder to get rid of the infant. In Carthage, there are no such signs on the remains which could have helped us find out the cause of death of the children.

“For centuries, infanticide was an accepted practice for disposing of unwanted female babies—and, less often, male babies. This was especially true in ancient Roman society. In a letter (dated to June 17 of the year 1 B.C. by our calendar), a certain Hilarion writes to his wife Alis: “I ask and beg you to take good care of our baby son … If you are delivered of child [before I get home,] if it is a boy keep it; if a girl, discard it.”

>> Look at the beauty of this sentence and how it’s redirecting your thoughts towards the Romans to keep you away from associating this finding to the Jews, since Ashkelon , where this macabre discovery was made, is in Israel after all. They magically forgot to mention the Tophet of Jerusalem condemned by so many prophets and how king Josiah tried to shut it down and stop the practice of child sacrifice taking place there. In other words, it’s “look here not there” trick being played on your mind here anons.

“Knowing that the Ashkelon bathhouse was an unlikely institution for either the city’s Jews or Christians, both of whom were overwhelmingly “pro-natal,” we assumed the bathhouse/bordello made sense in a Roman context. There should, according to conventional wisdom and calculations, be more female than male babies discarded in the sewers of Ashkelon. This determination could not be made by the analysis usually used by physical anthropologists. It is impossible to determine the sex of prepubescent humans from skeletal observations alone: Such diagnostic features as the pelvis have not yet reached a significant developmental stage.”

• Page 1 617 –

>>15048388

(Please read from the start)

>> LoL! What a liar! See how quickly she dismissed the Jews taking part of this? She conveniently forgot to mention the Tophet of Jerusalem and what was taking place there. She conveniently also forgot to mention the cult of a mutated form of the Evil Lady in Ashkelon itself, way before the Romans got their butts there. Just don’t suspect the Jews and focus on the Romans. The Christians wrote many complaints about the sacred prostitution practice in many places all around the Med Sea. We even have the apostles preaching in some of the centers where this cult was being practiced. We also know in the big centers where this cult was heavily practiced, there was always a big Hellenized Jewish community living there, as it was the case of Ephesus. It’s a pattern and anons can easily find it after checking out each and every single city like we did. And in all cities, the cults dates way back, way before the cities were Hellenized or conquered by the Romans. It used to take a local, native form, but after the arrival of the Greeks and then the Romans, it became Hellenized then Romanized. We studied each case and we found the same core pattern, while small details deferred from one location to another; but as I just said, the core was the same. The evil clan was spread all over and (((they))) infiltrated and settled themselves in almost every major city out there. It’s the same places where a large Jewish community was there as well. I’m repeating = study the pattern.

See how Smith is careful to avoid telling you all of this and not connecting the dots? You think she doesn’t know what was really taking place there? Of course she did, but she is covering for her “clan” = the Jews. We certainly don’t want them to be seen by the public in a bad way. And can anyone reading find me a letter of complaint or some written documents written by the synagogue or the Jewish community in the places where the sacred prostitution used to take place to try to put a stop to it…or at least simply complaint about the degenerated things taking place there? We have plenty of complaints written by the Christians…where are the Jewish ones? And let me point out that the Jews lived in those big cities for many centuries without writing or voicing a single complaint about the practice of the sacred prostitution in their city.

She is counting on you to be the Sheep that you’ve always been and never question things or check = research things out.

As for the gender of the dead infants, she is lying all the way up to her eye balls, because the big majority of the infants were males. After working for many years, we finally understood my mentor and me, what used to take place in those sacred prostitution centers. I will be explaining all of this to anons.

“Our only hope of determining the gender of the Roman infants from Ashkelon was DNA analysis. If the relevant ancient DNA could be isolated and successfully extracted, the X and Y chromosomes could be distinguished.

Drs. Ariella Oppenheim and Marina Faerman, of the hematology and anatomy departments at Hebrew University, determined that the sewer sample contained both sexes. They restricted the ancient DNA samples to left femurs so that they would not duplicate bones from the same infant. They tested 43 exemplars found in the gutter. The femurs were examined using three different tests, from which they could be confident in determining the sex of 19 individuals, based on DNA analyses. Of these, 14 were male and 5 female.

The high proportion of males supports the intriguing possibility that the infants discarded in the sewer were the unwanted offspring of bathhouse courtesans. The prostitutes of the establishment may have preferred to preserve a higher proportion of illegitimate female offspring to meet the future needs of the largely heterosexual institution.”

>> The last paragraph is halfway correct.

• Page 1 618 –