>>15295047

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 8: Phoenician Ivories – warriors from many clans.

Next, I’m going to get you acquainted to a series of Ivory plates which were produced by Phoenician craftsmen in Phoenicia = Phoenician art. These Ivory plates were decoration of many items like furniture. The furniture was sold to other civilizations, places like to Mesopotamia. This is why we found a big number of these sculpted ivories there, but the reader gotta remember that these originated in Phoenicia and they are Phoenician art. The reader should also remember that ivory is a perishable material and it’s very delicate.

I’m going to start with the Wikipedia page to give anons an idea what this is about and then I’m going to regroup the ivories according to design theme and then talk about them a bit. I also want to point out that anons can go online and take a look at the various designs out there of these ivories.

From the get go (((they))) messed the information about these artifact. These ivories are being called Nimrud Ivories because, in 1830, J.S. Buckingham called the place they were found in Nimrod Tuppé. And everyone got hooked on this, despite not being sure this is the correct name of the site. You are programed to associate the word Nimrud in your head with Evil. By associating these Ivories with Nimrud your brain automatically connects Evil to these Ivories and by extension to the Phoenician. It’s a mind game by word/name programing and manipulation. We had already given many examples of this in this thread and I hope now the reader starts to understand how the Jews and their nobility = the Bloodlines use (((their))) “magic” tricks to hypnotize your brain and direct it in the direction (((they))) want you to go. I’m going to put the name Nimrud in braquets because it’s unsure it’s the incorrect name of the site = still needs to be verified and rectified. Despite a big number of these Ivories were also found in Arslan Tash, Turkey, the correction/ rectification was never done.

“The Nimrud ivories are a large group of small carved ivory plaques and figures dating from the 9th to the 7th centuries BC that were excavated from the Assyrian city of Nimrud (in modern Ninawa in Iraq) during the 19th and 20th centuries. Most are fragments of the original forms; there are over 1,000 significant pieces, and many more very small fragments.

The ivories mostly originated outside Mesopotamia and are thought to have been made in the Levant and Egypt. They are carved with motifs typical of those regions and were used to decorate a variety of high-status objects, including pieces of furniture, chariots and horse-trappings, weapons, and small portable objects of various kinds. Many of the ivories would have originally been decorated with gold leaf or semi-precious stones, which were stripped from them at some point before their final burial. A large group were found in what was apparently a palace storeroom for unused furniture. Many were found at the bottom of wells, having apparently been dumped there when the city was sacked during the poorly-recorded collapse of the Assyrian Empire between 616 BC and 599 BC.”

>> There is a lot of lies and misinformation in this paragraph. It starts with the omission of the place of origin of these ivories = Phoenicia. Look carefully how they worded it here “originated outside of Mesopotamia”, “ thought to have been made in the Levant and Egypt” = (((they))) are dancing around the pot just so (((they))) won’t say it out loud these artifacts are Phoenician art. (((They))) would never admit these are Phoenician, (((they))) would choke on it if (((they))) did. We’ve encountered this behavior from the “manipulators” before towards the Phoenicians. It’s not the first time we see it in this thread; which is clearly indicating there is a pattern and this is “organized” and “planned”. This is no coincidence.

• Page 1 748 –

>>15301138

(Please read from the start)

It is correct that these ivories were decorating different types of objects, as mentioned in this paragraph, like furniture, chests, beds and many other type of objects including sword handles like the example I’ve attached in the previous page. With this page I’m attaching a picture of a Phoenician chair. This is a rare artifact and it’s in a very fragile state. It was this type of objects which were decorated with the ivory plates = the back and the sides. Sorry, I couldn’t find a better picture. It’s probably a unique artifact. The others didn’t survive, and it’s obvious why = It’s made of wood after all.

Anons shouldn’t be surprised at all to see Phoenician and/or Ancient Egyptian art influence on these ivories. I’ve already explained many times before and talked about many times before on how the Ancient Egyptian Art influenced the Phoenician one and why that happened. This type of Phoenician furniture was also found in Ancient Egypt, but it is not admitted it’s Phoenician and it’s called from Ancient Egypt. I’m putting a sketch as a sample for anons to understand what this is about. Please, if you would read what is written on it. Because some see a goat plate design on the side of the chair, it is said this is goat worshiping done by the Phoenicians (face palm for the old man). Do you even know how many types of animals were depicted on these ivory plates? We have so many animals, including lions, cows, eagles etc. and yet, when we see a goat design, it’s quickly linked (hinted) to Satanism = (((They))) are playing with words and with your mind here again. Why didn’t (((they))) mention the other designs as well. The Goat design was one out of many. If it were an exclusive design, as in all the ivory plates had uniquely this design, then I would have agreed with the “accusation” that the Phoenicians worshiped goats. But it’s not the case. And I want to remind the reader these chair were sold to other civilizations; which indicates commercial production.

I don’t agree with the dates given about these ivories. I think the production of these ivories is much older than what we are told. The production dates back to many centuries earlier and not just from the Assyrian era. The ivories that survived, date back from that time and we are seeing them. Just look at the date of the Phoenician chair found in Ancient Egypt = third picture with this page.

“Many of the ivories were taken to the United Kingdom and were deposited in (though not owned by) the British Museum. In 2011, the Museum acquired most of the British-held ivories through a donation and purchase and is to put a selection on view. It is intended that the remainder will be returned to Iraq. A significant number of ivories were already held by Iraqi institutions but many have been lost or damaged through war and looting. Other museums around the world have groups of pieces.”

>> Amazing how some mysterious collectors “deposited” these ivories in the British Museum. The museum didn’t own them for many years. It’s as if this mysterious collector was renting space in the B.M. Or maybe this collector is the real owner of the B.M. What do you think? Wanna bet the mysterious collector was from the Bloodlines? Ask yourselves asnons = why were the Bloodlines interested in these ivories? You will understand why when you take a look at them = it’s because the designs on most of them. These ivories were recently purchased by the B.M. but let’s be honest about it = they don’t belong there, they are the national cultural treasure of Iraq (most of them anyways) and they should be returned to their original owner.

• Page 1 749 –

>>15301220

(Please read from the start)

“Description

The ivories comprise plaques decorated in relief with intricate carvings of sphinxes, lions, serpents, people, flowers and geometric motifs, as well as carvings of female heads and female figurines. They were carved in various locations across the Ancient Near East, including Egypt, modern Syria and Lebanon, with relatively few carved locally. The ivory used to make these objects would originally have been derived from Syrian elephants which were endemic in the Middle East in ancient times, but by the 8th century BC the Syrian elephant had been hunted close to extinction, and ivory for later objects would have had to be imported from India, or, more likely, Africa.”

>> I’ve never seen one of these artifacts with a serpent on them, but the rest of the design list is rather correct – must include the “fabulous” animals as well. And no anons, these artifacts are all Phoenician made. See here, they are talking from the ideology that the Phoenician city-states were just a narrow coastline. They do not consider the city-states inland Syria, Lebanon as being Phoenician. They sometimes call them Canaanites, so that you would think these are not Phoenicians, but it’s a big lie, a very very big one. Aleppo is there to prove them wrong, so does Baalbek. You will understand me more a bit later; it’s coming in another evidence I’m going to present to anons.

“The ivory plaques are thought to have been used to decorate chariots, furniture and horse trappings, and would originally have been covered in gold leaf or ornamented with semi-precious stones such as lapis lazuli. Some pieces still preserve remnants of gold leafing. Many were already centuries old when put in storage and may have fallen out of fashion by that time. The gold may have been removed from the ivories before they were put in storage, or it may have been taken by the Babylonians when they sacked and razed Nimrud in 612 BC.”

>> It is possible some of these were also painted with vivid colors like red and blue, not just covered with gold or had gems inserted in them.

“Some of the ivories have Phoenician letters engraved on their back, which it is thought may have been used as guides to the assembly of pieces onto the furniture to which the ivories were attached. The presence of Phoenician letters on the ivories suggests that they were the product of Phoenician craftsmen.”

>> Take a look at the first picture I’m putting with this page: see the Phoenician letters written on the bottom? But the design is from Ancient Egypt, right? This is Phoenician despite (((them))) not wanting to admit it. It’s not SOME of these artifacts produced by the Phoenicians, ALL of them were. The Phoenicians were the ones whom mastered this art and this is their carving style = it has their signature on it = style. And as I’ve just given the example for anons, the Phoenician letters were not just inscribed on the back, but also on the fitting sections. I agree that these letters were there for assembling purposes = so that the craftsman can recognize which piece goes where. This indicated that these were not just randomly made, but planned in advance. Which in turn means that the buyer must have asked for the designs if it’s a custom made product.

• Page 1 750 –