>>15429386

(Please read from the start)

Site 18: Ain Horshe, Lebanon.

Ain Horshe is in the Beqaa Valley. The name suggests there was some type of water spring there since “Ain” in Arabic means spring or water source – see the other sites names with Ain in them as well. Ain Horshe is located in the South of Lebanon.

As anons can see, this temple is in the middle of nowhere. But I think back then, in the days, the area around it was green = filled with trees, like possibly cedar trees – same for the other temples in the middle of nowhere. What was said to the other temple sites can also be applied to this site here. It started with a Phoenician temple, which was worn out or fell apart with the passage of thousands of years. Then when the Romans came, they rebuilt a new Roman style temple on the foundations of the ancient Phoenician temple. The blocks were already in place, so there was no need to transport building material to the site, apart a few things. So the Roman re-used the already fall out block, re-shaped, re-carved, redecorated them. In rare cases, the Roman time quarries are in the vicinity of the sites.

As anons can see, on the back wall of the Roman temple in Ain Horshe, there is a relief of Luna = moon deity – this is how the Main Stream History interpret this relief. But anons already know by now this is the Evil Lady depicted here. And this is not the moon we are seeing, it’s the horns = she is the Sebetti ruler of one of the three horned clans after all. The horns with the spark were mistaken by the younger generation as being the moon. The younger generation didn’t understand that the symbol, as we see in Ancient Egypt and on the bronze Plaque from the Hells (also seen in Mesopotamian seals), was actually the Horns from the armors of the horned clans. The younger generation thought it was the moon and if there were clearly horns depicted in the picture, the younger generation thought there was only one horned clan, didn’t know there were 3 of them: 2 good and one evil.

• Page 1 801 –

>>15435460

(Please read from the start)

Please notice how the big blocks are cracked in Ain Horshe and look how big the broken blocks in the background are. These are Phoenician blocks.

Does this mean the Evil Cult was practiced in this temple? Well, that is half correct and half not correct. See from the Roman point of view they were praying for the Evil Couple, but for the locals, they thought these are the King of kings, Crown Prince and Neith. And before the Romans came, during Phoenician times, the cult of Neith, the King of kings and the Crown Prince was practiced here by the locals. This is why I’m saying it’s half/half. It al depends on whom = which era, is practicing in the end.

Was human sacrifice practiced in such places? Well, so far such sites are not excavated but I gotta remind anons these temples dedicated to the cult of the Evil Couple were built by the Romans, not the Phoenicians. When the Phoenicians had their temple there, they were in the same type of the temple of Eshmun since most of these temples were built in places with water presence = wells, springs, rivers etc. It’s the Romans whom switched these sites into the cult of the Evil Couple. You shouldn’t be surprise here anons because the Kabbalah and Satanist keep on doing this till this day. All you have to research is the number of churches turned into Satanic places, nightclubs, condos or simply closed. Best example is Katy Perry’s lawsuit with the nuns. Anything to desecrate a holy place. You think this wasn’t the case back in the Roman times? The Bloodlines always search for what is holy, take it, desecrate it, dirty it, steal or hijack it, twisting it in the process and make it their own in the end. (((They))) are not creative, (((they))) do not have anything originally (((their))) own. (((They))) take what the Light has, sully it, adapt it to their disgusting, sick ways, drench it with blood and (((they))) confiscate it as (((their))) own, claim it as (((their))) own. That’s why I always say (((they))) along with (((their))) people are copycats or wanna be. Since (((they))) cannot create the Light, (((they))) try to confiscate it as (((their))) own by getting (((their))) hands on what was created by the Light. This is another pattern.

We don’t know if human sacrifice was practiced in these sites because no excavations took place. We know there were burials, but they have been sacked long ago. The presence of sarcophaguses in SOME of the sites like it’s the case with Ain Horshe (see first picture in next page) indicates that someone was buried there. But it’s most likely someone with importance that was buried in the sarcophaguses because this is costly and bringing the sarcophagus to this height and so far away from human habitation is not easy = it needs labor and money. We think the ones buried there are most likely the priest, with a slighter possibility these are local nobles or higher rank people. When you sacrifice someone, you don’t go into such trouble to bury him in an expensive sarcophagus.

Also, we have noticed a pattern: despite the cult of the Evil Couple was practiced in such temples by the Romans, it seems there was a rejection from the populace to practice human sacrifice. This is why we think it was half/half. As in the locals kept on the old laws and traditions passed on from the Phoenician = forbidding human sacrifice. Tyre, Gebal, Amrit and Ugarit are good examples of that. So is the temple of Eshmun in Sidon, despite the Romans building new parts and extensions to it, there was no human sacrifice practiced there. Nothing was found of the sort. This is why we think the way of thinking of the locals didn’t change = human sacrifice was not accepted by the populace. Not even the sacred prostitution. Maybe it was practiced in secret by some, but till this day, no tangible evidence supporting that was ever found in Syria or Lebanon despite some of the big coastal City-States being fully excavated.

• Page 1 801 – A1

>>15435494

(Please read from the start)

There are a lot of local complaints from the early Christians of the region wanting to shut down the imperial temple of Venus Heliopolitana in Baalbek because the sacred prostitution was practiced there. The people simply rejected it, didn’t want it and hated it. There was anger which accumulated with time. But in the same time, the one practicing such things didn’t stop and kept on practicing them despite the many attempts to close such places. These were powerful people and it’s obvious they knew what they were doing and practicing. Here, you can clearly see the classes in society following this or that side. The populace was against the sacred prostitution in Baalbek, but the Roman citizens and their nobles were all for it. This speaks volumes as to whom was behind it all and whom was running the show.

The Roman Bath House in Baalbek was found and fully excavated; same thing for the one in Beirut. Both cities were Roman colonies which meant they had Roman citizens living there. No skeletal remains of any kind, including infants/children, were found in the canalization, sewer system or water system of these bath houses = completely different of what was found in Ashkelon (page 1 617).

https://www.livius.org/articles/place/heliopolis-baalbek/baalbek-photos/baalbek-bustan-al-khan/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Baths,_Beirut

If we didn’t find any evidence in big urban cities, including Roman times, in Phoenicia, indicating human sacrifice took place there, I don’t know if we will find any in such small and remote places like most of the sites I’m showing you. The denser the population is, the higher the chances are to find skeletons with human sacrifice traces on them. But we didn’t find any in Tyre which was accused of being a huge center of immorality and human sacrifice took place frequently there according to the Jews. Same for Sidon, we found nothing there, mostly not in the temple of Eshmun. If we didn’t find any skeletons with sacrificial marks on them in such big places, the chances are very low we will find any in such remote places as the sites I’m showing you. Mostly because it’s hard to get there, because of the snow and how isolated, far away they are from human population; it’s hard to get there even on horse back because of the climate and terrain = it’s very harsh. The graves we are finding in such remote temples are those of adults with deep pockets whom could afford to be buried there.

As anons can see from the picture I’m attaching with this page the Evil One was represented as Sol by the Romans in the temples they built = they think he is the sun = the light. But this is originally the temple of the King of kings or the Crown Prince which were both of them the REAL LIGHT. Substitution, super positioning took place here = the new cult rested on top of the old cult and merged with it. See the iconography of the Evil One is identical to his iconography we saw in the previous temple site. This is stereotyped. Yes anons, you are looking at the iconography of the Evil One. Remember, the Phoenician don’t use images of their deity.

I just hope I explained this clearly for anons because this is very complex and not easy to understand. This is not a black or white situation. Just imagine it as you are putting your hands one on top of the other. The lower one is the original cult, then a new one came and positioned itself on top of the lower hand, pretending it’s the same to a point that they mixed, merged.

• Page 1 801 – A2

>>15435521

(Please read from the start)

Site 19: Menjez/ Tell Arqa, Lebanon

Menjez is located, as well as Tell Arqa, in the North of Lebanon. Menjez is a site where megalithic tombs were found; around 80 of them if I remember it right. Tell Arqa also has megalithic blocks in it, re-used.

I’m putting this link for anons whom are interested in these sites for more information: https://lcf.lau.edu.lb/images/phoenician-menjez.pdf

What we think happened from studying the pattern we’ve got, is that these sites are all originally Phoenician. The megalithic construction, mostly at the bottom, the base, is there’s. Most of these sites were abandoned or fell into neglect as time went on. When the Romans came, they recognized what was there and they re-used the site and rebuilt Roman style temples on top of the Phoenician remains of ancient Temples, sometimes re-using the old blocks or re-carving them. Or sometimes, in rare cases, bring some blocks from nearby quarries – depending on the case.

• Page 1 802 –

>>15436386

(Please read from the start)

As anons can see, some of the blocks are small while others are big. I don’t know if some of you will consider this site as a megalithic site or not.

• Page 1 802 – A1

>>15436412

(Please read from the start)

As for Tell Arqa, it’s not far away from Menjez. This site was not fully excavated. And there are many layers here, from the Phoenicians = the oldest, then the Hellenistic, then the Roman, then the Byzantine, and finally the Crusades. The blocks have been re-used many times. But this site hasn’t given all of its secrets yet.

This site is not going to be easy to untangle because of the many layers in it. For those interested, I hope you research the sites yourselves, I’m just pointing the way.

The last picture I put with this page is of Tell Arqa taken from a distance. This is what I mean when I talk about ancient Tells. This is a Tell. We believe these Tells are ancient settlements abandoned and people moved somewhere else.

• Page 1 803 –