>>15087732

(Please read from the start)

In order to proceed with taking a look at Evidence number 4 we have on our hands here, we need to understand what is a satanic child sacrifice ritual. The next part is not for the faint of heart.

The Phoenicians were accused of worshiping Baal and Moloch = 2 variation of Satan – sort of speak. Moloch doesn’t even exist in the Phoenician pantheon or Phoenician deity list (check out Ugarits archives). So this doesn’t make him a Phoenician deity. As for Baal, it’s an honorific, confused and used as the name of Satan. Sometimes it is also used in the names of Phoenician kings = a theophoric type of name. There are MANY “Baalim” ( = plural) in Phoenician, not ONE. As I’ve said before, when reading the few Phoenician texts that we have, we can put “Baal” into 4 different categories:

1 - We have Baal pointing to the mortal kings of the Phoenician City-states + nobility (regardless if they are good or bad).

2 – We have Baal pointing to the mortal foreign kings + nobility (regardless if they are good or bad).

3 - We have Baal pointing our Heavenly Father = the Great Creator God.

4 – We have Baal pointing to many youthful thunder yielding type of warrior gods – or deities in general.

Strangely enough, when you replace the word Baal in all of these cases with the world Lord, it fits perfectly.

So what do we know from the Jews mostly, on how the Phoenicians (not the Carthaginians) sacrificed children?

1 – The Phoenicians sacrificed their first born males.

2 – The Phoenicians sacrificed in an open air sanctuary which had a Jewish name Tophet.

3 – The Phoenician did a ritual called = passage of fire – which was described/ interpreted as throwing the child while it was alive in fire.

4 – The Phoenicians sacrificed to Moloch (putting the child in the hands of the statue) or to Baal.

Do we know something else from the Jewish sources on how the Phoenicians sacrificed children? I’m going from memory here, so I might have forgotten one or two. If anons want to bring them to my attention, then please do.

Then other sources started to appear gradually in history, starting with the Greek, then the Romans….to reappear in somewhat modern history, starting in the 18th century, to get some steam in the 19th century, to reach its climax in the other half of the 20th century till now. The rather modern sources relied on the ancient sources = Greek and Roman, and leaned on them using them as ancient proof the Phoenician practiced human sacrifice. They took these old sources as a base to restart/relaunch the attack and destroy the public image of the Phoenicians all over again.

• Page 1 641 –

>>15093233

(Please read from the start)

What amazed me in the ancient sources were the details given in some, regarding the ritual of human sacrifice supposedly done by the Phoenicians. How did they know these details? Like how did they know this or that was done? How did they know the parents were there, the mother not making any reaction to the sacrifice of her child? How did they know the priest put the baby in the hands of the statue of Moloch and then the baby rolled into the fire of the pyre? While others claimed the children were slaughtered first = cut with a blade, blood coming out and then when the child died it was tossed in the fire of the pyre. These are just a few examples.

I always wondered how these ancient writers knew of these things without seeing them personally = without them being a first-hand eye witnesses? As far as I know, there isn’t a single eye witness to the human sacrifice ritual practiced by the Phoenicians. It’s all hearsay. So how did these ancient writers know about these details (despite them being contradictory to one another) about the ritual? I always thought the ancient writers were imagining these details or simply making them up via imagination.

As if that is not enough, the rather modern sources amazed me on how in their turn, also provided vivid descriptions of the human sacrifice ritual practiced by the Phoenicians. How did they know? They surely didn’t travel back in time to witness these rituals themselves. So how did they know? Their description is even more detailed than the ones provided in the ancient sources. For decades I thought these modern day writers (more or less) had a greater imagination than the ancient sources; as in they took the fantasy tales of the ancient sources and amplified them and added their imaginative take to it all as well. Some are very obviously working for the Bloodlines and/or receiving marching orders from them. So I always took this issue as being one big imaginative story, blown out of proportion just to destroy the Phoenicians/Carthaginians.

After coming to this board and reading the Qteam drops, I found out I was terribly, terribly wrong. Maybe, just maybe, without even wanting it, the Qteam helped me in solving the Carthage burial and the Phoenician human sacrifice issue. The way the team helped was by pointing on HOW this human sacrifice ritual is performed. By helping me understand HOW this ritual was performed, the team, along with Potus and Flotus, helped me understand the WHY.

And this is what we are going to talk about next: I’m going to talk about the HOW first, then about the WHY. Both are connected to one another and to evidence number 4.

The HOW:

1 – Everything starts with kidnaping, snatching or buying the child. I don’t think anons noticed that this is how the ritual actually starts = getting the kid by “dirty” means. The reader might laugh at me, but I think the ritual of child sacrifice starts with the “ACTION” to get the child in an immoral way = theft, tricks, abduction, lies, cheating, bribery etc. I’ve used nice “polite” words for the anons to read, but you should imagine the worst here. This act of “theft” mostly as in kidnapping the child is done on purpose for too many reasons, one of them I think it’s related to Inanna/the Evil Lady and how she didn’t hesitate to resort to theft and lies to get her way with things. And here we have an insane and totally disgusting tunnel to dig into = how the victims are selected. As in what is the selection process and criteria of the victims?

• Page 1 642 –

>>15093255

(Please read from the start)

2 – Regardless of the means of transport, the child is taken to a specific location which holds some type of “magical” or ritualistic, symbolic significance, importance that only (((their))) twisted minds understand. In other words, for some strange reason that I don’t fully understand (((they))) are bound to WHERE these rituals are performed. I think (((they))) like to perform them to places with strong energy points on earth, or in some cases like the “Place de la Concorde” = it holds a very high symbolic meaning to the Payseur clan because it’s the place where Louis XVI was beheaded. Another place where (((they)))) perform sacrificial rituals is in a place or a geographic point where a LOT of people died, like a square or a yard where a lot of people were massacre or buried. All of the possibilities I’ve just mentioned to the reader have one thing in common = they are a geographic point connected to Spiritual energy, specifically, it’s connected to the transfer of Spiritual energy; somehow, someway. But I don’t fully understand it yet.

The abducted child is taken to that location either a long period prior to the sacrifice and kept there alive = as providing barely any necessities as food and water for the child until the day of the ritual. Or depending on the case, some children are brought barely a few hours to the location where the ritual will take place.

We just talked about the WHERE.

3 – The previous point is connected to this one = the calendar – We are going to talk about the WHEN. From what I’ve been reading online there are 2 time frames for the rituals. There are the big ceremonies which the Kabbalah perform on a yearly basis like Halloween for example. Such rituals are held according to a religious calendar. We have that in Christianity too, in Islam, in Judaism and if I’m not mistaking, even in Buddhism. Apart this yearly calendar, the Kabbalah also have … how should I call it? = a daily ritual practice or more like a routine, common practice in everyday life. This is connected to the WHY.

I’m going to talk about it just after the HOW.

4 – So after the place and the date are set; the child is selected and brought to the location, what happens then? We are going to talk now about the HOW:

It starts by a series of different types of physical abuse to the child. I believe this includes starving the child and causing physical harm to the child. This includes torturing the child physically and sexually abusing the child. This second type of torture is done not just to physically torture the child, but to mentally, emotionally and spiritually break the child. You can imagine all the horrors being made here. And the length of this period can go from a few hours to several days.

This has a purpose apart the sadistic twisted one, this is not done randomly. Anons researching found out this was done to produce Adrenochrome by the body of the victim. It’s (((their))) fountain of youth and apparently Adrenochrome is very addictive. This makes the blood of the victim precious to (((them))).

• Page 1 643 –

>>15093278

(Please read from the start)

5 – When Adrenochrome is produced in the body, this is when the victim is killed. But I don’t think it’s killed in any way; I mean I think it’s killed in a way to be able to draw the blood of the victim as much as could be drawn out. After all, for these crazy sick people, the blood is (((their))) precious commodity. This means the victims is mostly likely killed = most of the time, in a way where the blood can be drawn from it = collected.

6 – The blood is consumed, and the flesh of the victims is also consumed just like what we see on the screen from the monitor of the underground facility under Esptein Island’s temple.

7 – I think a small portion of the victim’s body is burned, most likely the heart of the victim. I think this is done on the surface, where there is this small fire pit on the side of the temple on Epstein’s Island – I’ve previously pointed to it before.

Why I think it’s the heart of the victim that is burned?

A – The heart is a hard muscle, by that I mean the flesh is hard and not easily chewable. Don’t forget these cannibals are consuming the flesh of their victims raw – at least this is how it looks like from the footage of the picture I’m putting with this page.

B – Seth is said to have consumed the heart of Osiris. As in I’m suspecting the Evil One to have consumed the heart of the Great King. That is just a text, but we also have the relief from page 1 366 where we see the Evil One stabbing the King of kings in the abdomen. So the idea is floating in my mind that the Evil One consumed the heart of the King of kings.

C – The Aztecs were known for cutting out the heart of their sacrificial victims. Some Native American tribes are rumored to consume the heart of their enemies. The same rumor goes for some African tribes. It’s believed by consuming the heart of their enemy, they consume its strength and life force.

D – I know this one is going to sound strange, but I see a lot of projection of the Evil Clan in the movie series Aliens. Like how it has a Queen Alien which lay eggs. As well as how the alien incubating in a human host burst out of the chest = it’s a symbolic reminder of how the Evil One took out the heart of the King of kings. Also evil residing inside the humans. That’s how I see it.

I think the ritual of human sacrifice ends with the burning of the heart of the victim, as it being an offering to the Evil One, or the Evil Lady. By burning the heart, they are repeating the act of the Evil One consuming the heart of the Great King. They are also giving him a share of the victim, as in by burning the heart, he is symbolically consuming as well a part of the victim.

Before I came to this board, I didn’t know all of these disgusting, gruesome things about the ritual. I always thought the children were tied up to stop them from moving too much and they were somehow tossed into the fire while being alive. But now I see things differently, mostly the ancient sources where some of them contain details similar or should I say details which can be considered as being very close to what I recently found out about the ritual after coming to this board. I always thought these ancient Greek and Roman sources were biased and they reach deep into their imagination just to paint the Phoenicians as monsters. You know, like an exaggerated work of fiction. But now, I’m suspecting at least some of them to have either personally witnessed a satanic human sacrifice performed by the Ancient Bloodlines or to have been the ones practicing = taking part of such rituals. There is also a slight possibility some of these ancient sources were just pawns which information was passed onto them and they simply wrote about it without them doing it.

• Page 1 644 –