>>15133079

(Please read from the start)

If you cremate the body, then you cannot eat it. Some might argue and say that the child was slaughtered and the blood was drained, then some parts = some organs, might have been eaten from the children, after the body was cremated. My reply: where are the marks? If the child was slaughtered then his body was cut open and some organs were removed to be eaten, then this is going to leave marks on the bones. But we have none on the bones of Carthage. This indicates the children were cremated as whole and not cut open. There is also not a single sign of trauma on the bones in Carthage.

You see how big the difference is anons. With La Voisin, we bumped into a burial where sacrificed children remains were found. These were no cremated children, which open the possibility of cannibalism taking place there – because when you cremate the body, and there are no trauma, knife and teeth marks on the bones, then this means the children were cremated as a whole, without cutting them open in any way.

2 – The burial in La Voisin garden is the type of burials we were looking for in Syria and Lebanon, but we found none. Go back to Evidence 3, when I was talking about this and I said we found no mass graves, no sacrificial knife, no sacrificial altar in Phoenicia. See how easy it is to detect a mass grave of children sacrificed? If children sacrifice was taking place in Phoenicia, then we would have found a similar burial in Lebanon and on the coast of Syria. But none was found because such practices didn’t take place there.

3 - Another notable point is the absence of tombstones, coffins or any other thing indicating the children buried in the garden of La Voisin had “a proper” = “respectful” burial. From the looks of it, these infants were just dumped there. We see no care given to how they were buried, no money was spent to purchase a nice tombstone for them. It’s the complete opposite of what we see in Carthage and how much care was given to bury these children in the burial there; not to mention the money spent to purchase everything to bury the children = it was costly.

4 - What about the duration? With La Voisin, from an approximative, quick calculation from my part, I can say that she must have sacrificed around a 100 child per year for around 25 years’ time spam. It’s just an approximatively estimation anons, it’s not an accurate one. I’m talking gorsso modo here. While in Carthage well, the city was founded in 814 B.C. and it was destroyed by the Romans in 146 B.C. After that, it fell under the Roman rule. This leaves me with 668 years approximately with Carthage being a Punic city. How many infants are buried in that cemetery is unknown, but it’s estimated something around 20 000 urns according to the numbers I’ve got.

In the case of La Voisin, we have 2 500 dead child in around 25 years.

In the case of Carthage, we have 20 000 dead child in around 668 years.

If we divide 668/25 = 26.72.

So if I multiply 2 500 x 26.72 = 66 800.

Do you understand what I just did? If La Voisin (or others like her) kept on practicing without being caught in France as long as the Phoenicians are accused of practicing child sacrifice, the number of dead infants would have been around 66 800 sacrificed infants. And this is based on the number of just ONE burial in the garden of LaVoisin. There were OTHERS like her all over France. She was not a unique case. Do you understand where I’m going with this? It’s simply insane. The number of dead infants in La Voisin garden is just insane. And the demography of Paris back during the reign of Louis XIV was estimated to be around half a million person. Carthage was estimated to be the same number during its peak. La Voisin was ONE of MANY…which brings the question? = how many others like her were around? 3? 10? 15? If one person buried 2 500 infant in her garden, how many did the others bury as well? The numbers in France are just insane.I hope anons understand my chain of thougths here when I’m comparing the burial of Carthage to what was found in the garden of La Voisin = I’m trying to say if the burial in Carthage was where Satanic ritual victims were burried, we would have seen an explosif number if burried children there and not just around 20 000 over the spam of 668 years. The number would have been at least 3 times higher if the burial of Carthage was a satanic ritual victims burial site.

• Page 1 669 –

>>15139703

(Please read from the start)

5 – There was a stele in Carthage with a priest depicted on it carrying a dead child and performing a burial ritual (page 1 566). This means a priest prayed for the child during burial. The infants buried in the garden of La Voisin, did a priest pray for them during burial? Of course not. The only ritual performed was a satanic one to eat them not that their souls would rest in peace and find their way to Heaven. Remember the Light Beam symbol on the stele?

I guess this is enough comparison between the burial in Carthage and the burial in the garden of La Voisin to help anons see the huge difference between a real Satanic sacrificial victims burial and a normal children burial in Carthage.

Keep this in mind. I’m going to give next one last about the McLeod Syndrome, but this time it’s a female with a double sick X chromosome: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne,_Queen_of_Great_Britain

“Anne (6 February 1665 – 1 August 1714) was Queen of England, Scotland, and Ireland between 8 March 1702 and 1 May 1707. On 1 May 1707, under the Acts of Union, the kingdoms of England and Scotland united as a single sovereign state known as Great Britain. She continued to reign as Queen of Great Britain and Ireland until her death in 1714.

Anne was born in the reign of Charles II to his younger brother and heir presumptive, James, whose suspected Roman Catholicism was unpopular in England. On Charles's instructions, Anne and her elder sister, Mary, were raised as Anglicans. Mary married their Dutch Protestant cousin, William III of Orange, in 1677, and Anne married Prince George of Denmark in 1683. On Charles's death in 1685, James succeeded to the throne, but just three years later he was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Mary and William became joint monarchs. Although the sisters had been close, disagreements over Anne's finances, status, and choice of acquaintances arose shortly after Mary's accession and they became estranged. William and Mary had no children. After Mary's death in 1694, William reigned alone until his own death in 1702, when Anne succeeded him.

During her reign, Anne favoured moderate Tory politicians, who were more likely to share her Anglican religious views than their opponents, the Whigs. The Whigs grew more powerful during the course of the War of the Spanish Succession, until 1710 when Anne dismissed many of them from office. Her close friendship with Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough, turned sour as the result of political differences. The Duchess took revenge with an unflattering description of the Queen in her memoirs, which was widely accepted by historians until Anne was re-assessed in the late 20th century.

Anne was plagued by ill health throughout her life, and from her thirties she grew increasingly ill and obese. Despite seventeen pregnancies, she died without surviving issue and was the last monarch of the House of Stuart. Under the Act of Settlement 1701, which excluded all Catholics, she was succeeded by her second cousin George I of the House of Hanover.”

• Page 1 670 –

>>15139721

(Please read from the start)

“Early life

Anne was born at 11:39 p.m. on 6 February 1665 at St James's Palace, London, the fourth child and second daughter of the Duke of York (afterwards James II and VII), and his first wife, Anne Hyde. […] The Duke and Duchess of York had eight children, but Anne and Mary were the only ones to survive into adulthood.”

>> Out of 8 children only 2 made it to adulthood. See how easily you can detect the McLeod syndrome?

“As a child, Anne suffered from an eye condition, which manifested as excessive watering known as "defluxion". For medical treatment, she was sent to France, where she lived with her paternal grandmother, Henrietta Maria of France, at the Château de Colombes near Paris. Following her grandmother's death in 1669, Anne lived with an aunt, Henrietta Anne, Duchess of Orléans. On the sudden death of her aunt in 1670, Anne returned to England. Her mother died the following year.

[…]

In 1673, the Duke of York's conversion to Catholicism became public, and he married a Catholic princess, Mary of Modena, who was only six and a half years older than Anne. Charles II had no legitimate children, and so the Duke of York was next in the line of succession, followed by his two surviving daughters from his first marriage, Mary and Anne—as long as he had no son. Over the next ten years, the new Duchess of York had ten children, but all were either stillborn or died in infancy, leaving Mary and Anne second and third in the line of succession after their father. […]”

>> We have 10 children whom are either stillborn or died in infancy. The McLeod Syndrome hits once again.

“Marriage

In November 1677, Anne's elder sister, Mary, married their Dutch first cousin William III of Orange, at St James's Palace, but Anne could not attend the wedding because she was confined to her room with smallpox. […]

Bishop Compton officiated at the wedding of Anne and George of Denmark on 28 July 1683 in the Chapel Royal at St James's Palace. Although it was an arranged marriage, they were faithful and devoted partners. They were given a set of buildings, known as the Cockpit, in the Palace of Whitehall as their London residence, and Sarah Churchill was appointed one of Anne's ladies of the bedchamber. Within months of the marriage, Anne was pregnant, but the baby was stillborn in May. Anne recovered at the spa town of Tunbridge Wells, and over the next two years, gave birth to two daughters in quick succession: Mary and Anne Sophia.”

• Page 1 671 –