Anonymous ID: d00003 Jan. 17, 2022, 5:50 a.m. No.15396949   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6956

>>15390140

 

(Please read from the start)

 

Site 3: Temple of Eshmun, Sidon, Lebanon.

 

Anons are already acquainted with this temple as we’ve already seen it in this thread (starting page 1 430). I told anons before that this site is older than what is admitted by the Main Stream History. Anyone reading noticed the big blocks = the megalithic blocks? Well, I did and here are some pictures. It’s always the blocks from the lowest levels that are megalithic and different in texture and cutting technique. The more you advance in time = going up, the more the blocks get smaller and the masonry work change. And there is no question that the temple of Eshmun was built by the Phoenicians.

 

  • Page 1 781 –

Anonymous ID: d00003 Jan. 17, 2022, 5:51 a.m. No.15396956   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9590

>>15396949

 

(Please read from the start)

 

The lowest blocks are always the oldest and they are different from the other blocks. And there is always the chance that some of these big blocks were re-cut, re-carved by new comers on the site and re-used to build this and that part. Some of the blocks are cracked or damaged as well from different factors like earthquakes, wars, etc.

 

I say this site hasn’t revealed all of its secrets to us and there is more to discover here.

 

  • Page 1 781 – A1

Anonymous ID: d00003 Jan. 17, 2022, 1:01 p.m. No.15399590   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9633

>>15396956

 

(Please read from the start)

 

Site 4: Aintoura El Maten, Lebanon

 

The names are a bit hard for me, so I hope I’m transmitting them correctly to anons. This site is untouched and not excavated. The vegetation has grown all over it, covering it as you can see from the pictures. And we don’t have any information at all about it. But comparing the blocks, the masonry work and the technique used to cut them with the other sites = it’s clear it’s the same method used in all of the sites. These are Phoenician megalithic blocks. I also couldn’t find a proper location map to share with anons. I’m sorry about that.

 

  • Page 1 782 –

Anonymous ID: d00003 Jan. 17, 2022, 1:05 p.m. No.15399633   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4241

>>15399590

 

(Please read from the start)

 

Site 5: Nahleh/Nahlé, Lebanon

 

Again, this is an abandoned site. Barely any information. The vegetation has also grown all over it. But the megalithic blocks are visible. I also know that Nahleh is located close to Baalbek site, to the North-East of it.

 

  • Page 1 783 –