>>15349155

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 11 = Iconography of Baal.

This has been one of the hardest puzzles I’ve encountered. The bronze statuettes of Baal are found all over Phoenicia and it’s stereotyped despite some seem to be rudimentary while others are finely crafted. Despite the different levels in craftsmanship there are standard traits in the iconography of Baal which clearly distinguish him from other deities. The best examples of his iconography came from Ugarit and I’m going to rely mostly on this artifact to talk about Baal. Why did I choose the iconography of Baal coming from Ugarit? Well, it still preserves its Phoenicia core, as in I believe it’s the closest to its Phoenician origin = the cleanest from mutations and variations.

The most famous representation of Baal is a relief from Ugarit where he is depicted from the side. He is standing on something elevated, like an elevated platform. What’s under his feet? Here, there are different opinions. Some say these are waves. Others say these are battlements of a citadel/ fortress wall, similar to what we see depicted on Phoenician coins. Regardless of what they might be, he is clearly standing on a platform; put on top of these = standing on an elevated place. He is wearing a wraparound skirt and his chest is bare. He has a dagger tucked in on his belt. His hair is long and he’s got a beard.

He is wearing a pointy hat identical to the Tantoor hat which we already saw on page 1 710. I’m attaching an artifact from Ugarit of a Phoenician wearing an identical hat. Apart being pointy, Baal’s hat has 2 additional notables. First, is the head band he is wearing which is depicted as thin and it’s tied in a knot on the back of his head. This is worn on purpose to keep his long hair back while he is fighting = away from his face. We still see in a lot of cultures/civilizations, mostly in training, in fighting techniques or army, headbands being worn. Secondly, we have the horns coming out of his hat, are clearly Bull horns from their shape. And this takes me to Hadad which we’ve already seen on page 1 690; making it associated to the Bull = Lamassu clan. It doesn’t surprise me at all to find a link between this type of Baal and the Lamassu clan because we already know the link between Neith/Isis/Hathor and Horus/ThunderBirds.

He has his right hand raised above his head in which he is holding a club or a mace. With his left hand, he is holding a strange weapon: the lower end of this weapon is shaped like a spear’s head, while the upper end of this weapon is interpreted in different ways. Some see it as a tree with branches, others say these are flames from a fire. I say these are Lightning and what he is holding is the staff weapon of the ThunderBirds which emits electricity.

In the space between the staff weapon and the body of Baal, right under his left arm we have a smaller person depicted. Unfortunately the upper part is damaged. This person is of high status because he is standing on an elevated platform as well. He is wearing a long robe tunic of some sort. He seems to be holding something in his hand close to his body but since it’s damaged, I’m unsure. What I’m sure of is that there is long band coming down from his head level to his back.

Here, it’s more than clear, that the one we call Baal, worshiped as a deity by the Phoenicians is a ThunderBird = the archenemy of the Horned Serpents. There is one stele which I couldn’t find a picture online called the stele of Baal Qadbun, dating back to 7th century B.C., it’s currently in Tartous Museum Syria. He is depicted with some type of circular object with a handle in his right hand, the spear in his left hand, wearing the elongated hat….but he is standing on a marked ground, on top of a lion….and we know what that means in this thread = from Atlantis. It’s becoming more and more clear, right anon.

• Page 1 766 –

>>15357138

(Please read from the start)

I’ve already mentioned in page 1 641 that there are 4 types of Baal in Phoenicia…this iconography of a Thunder wielding warrior is of number 4 on that page. And there were MANY of them in Phoenicia, like almost each City-State had its own Baal = its own ThunderBird even more than one of them in one City-State sometimes. And this is very logical. When you gather the information we’ve got so far about the ThunderBirds you will see that their job was to preserve order and law among humans as well, but not just any humans = the people of the ThunderBird Clan, they are the guardians and warriors of their clan. This is why we see many ThunderBirds stationed in many Phoenician City-States. This is the army = warriors of the ThunderBirds Clan which protected the people and also saw that Law & Order was respected among the people of their clan. This is why we have so many Baalim in Phoenicia whom all are connected to thunder and lightning = the many Hadads worshiped there. And this is why we have so many artifacts with ThunderBirds iconography coming out of Phoenicia = the Phoenicians were their people, the people of the ThunderBirds, they worshiped them as deities because they had superhuman powers. And the Phoenician nobility was the direct descendants of these ThunderBird Lords.

When it comes for the bronze statuettes, there are plenty of them from all over Phoenicia, but I’m putting examples of those coming from Ugarit. Regardless from which City-State the bronze statuettes come, from they have ALL of them 2 standard notables = common to ALL of them:

1 – Baal is represented wearing an “elongated” hat on all of them (linked to page 1 705).

2 – His stance is identical in all of them = feet and arms.

It’s clear he is brandishing a weapon ready to strike but there are arguments what this weapon could be. Some say it’s a club/ a mace and others say it’s a spear. But if we compare the stance from the bronze statuette with the stance on the relief from the previous page, it’s identical and there, we already know what he is holding in both hands. So for me, there is no doubt he is holding a club/mace with his right hand and a staff-weapon, a sharur in his left one.

Seeing Baal relief is something, but seeing him on these bronze statuettes is like seeing a 3D model of him. It’s then that I realized that the stance of Baal = his posture in all of his iconography is a déjà vu for me. I’ve seen this stance before and it’s an incredibly famous one = the Constellation of Orion. In the old days, Orion constellation was personified like what you see in the third picture I’m attaching with this page = as in he is holding a club and a “lion’s” skin as some sort of shield. As anons can see, Baal posture and iconography and Orion constellation’s posture and iconography are identical. It’s the SAME. But this was changed on purpose, modified slightly to make the new generation forget the old iconography of Orion’s constellation. (((They))) transformed it to the 4th picture I’m attaching with this page = as in Orion holding a sword and a shield. A small modification but it had a great impact of pushing us away from the iconography of Baal and not looking for connections between the two. I don’t Orion is holding a shield or a Lion’s skin: it is incorrect. I think he is actually holing a sharur weapon = a staff weapon. This was wrongfully interpreted even in the old days.

As if this is not enough, please check out how Orion constellation is represented on the Dendera Zodiac (starting page 107) which we’ve already seen. I’ve put that zodiac with the names of each constellation so that anons can easily notice Orion constellation. Here, he is holding the Was staff (page 992) = his staff weapon with his left hand. It looks like is holding another weapon in his right hand, maybe a flail, but this one is not raised up like what we have Baal. The posture is similar, but not identical here. But in both cases he wears the “elongated” hat, which is linked to Osiris (starting page 834) just as the Orion constellation is also linked to Osiris.

Also look at Sirius right behind Orion constellation from Dendera zodiac. It’s depicted like a bull/cow with a star = spark between its horns. I’m referring the readers back to page where I talked about the electricity between the horns of Hathor (starting page 971). To make it even more incredible, this Sirius in the shape of a bovine is depicted in a BOAT which looks amazingly like a kuphar (starting page 15) seen from the side. Crazy, right?

I’m coming full circle here and all the connections are made with the other digging tunnels from different parts of this thread.

• Page 1 767 –

>>15357184

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 12: Phoenician Ivory combs.

There are some luxury items made of ivory which are hair combs made by the Phoenicians. They sport some decorative designs on each side of the comb. As it is the case with the other artifacts, the subjects of the designs vary, but we have general themes, with different details, repeating, like the Griffin/Sphinx.

The first picture attached with this page is very important because it is a confirmation that the Griffin/Sphinx is a symbolic representation of a royal. Here, we clearly see a winged feline with a bearded human head, wearing a crown. For me, there is no doubt about this is the Crown Prince of Atlantis or a direct descendant of him = his bloodline.

People with lower ranks used combs made of “cheaper” materials, like wood for example. The ivory combs are considered luxury products and there for were used by higher rank people like the royals and nobility. These artifacts are rare and delicate, not many survived because they are made of perishable material.

• Page 1 768 –

>>15364107

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 13: Atlantean system of ruling: City-States and King-Priests.

Phoenicia, like the other places in the world where the survivors from the Cataclysm first emerged, had a special system of ruling based on the City-States system. And just like it was the case in those places (like Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia and Andean Region, seen so far). Before the Upper and Lower kingdoms appeared in Ancient Egypt and it was the same system of rule in Mesopotamia till the end of the Akkadian era (more or less). We know that the City-State system in Phoenicia lasted = was in use till the conquest of Alexander, then the entire area was under the Seleucide/Lagides rule. If I take into consideration when the Phoenician City-States were founded, that is one long track record for staying in that system.

As for the King-Priest system, we also know it was used in Phoenicia just like it was the case in the other places. But there, it fell out of use at some point, like around the end of the Akkadian era, it started to fade away and we saw hunger for centralized power emerge – separation between the political and religious powers. In Ancient Egypt, we saw it disappear with the creation of the kingdoms at first, then a second time with the rise of Narmer and how he united the rule in Ancient Egypt under one person. By then the religious and political power had separated a long time ago. This was not the case in Phoenicia. Thanks to the inscription of their king’s sarcophaguses (like the one on Eshmunazar II sarcophagus) we know the rulers of the Phoenician City-States also held the highest religious power till the arrival of Alexander.

We also detected the patterns of these 2 systems being used worldwide by Cataclysm survivors which is obviously how the ruling system was in Atlantis before = because people bring their way of living with them from one era to another after all.

This is another indicator that the Phoenicians are Atlanteans and their direct descendants of course. But for the Phoenicians to “hang onto” both systems of City-States and King-Priest for thousands of years = that long period of time, while everyone else abandoned it; as well as not being influenced by the ruling system of their great empire neighbors = Ancient Egypt, Hittites, Persian etc. This is an indication that both systems mentioned above are deeply entrenched in Phoenician mentality to a point that even much younger generations didn’t let go of it, till brutal force was used on them by Alexander. Even under the Seleucides and the Lagide rule, the old City-States, even though fully Hellenized, still kept local habits from Phoenician times and a somewhat the autonomy of their City-State.

• Page 1 769 –

>>15364122

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 14: Bronze statuette of duo deity from Tartus, Syria.

This Phoenician bronze artifact was found in Tartus, Syria. The Main Stream History interprets these 2 deities as being Asterath wearing a feathered atef crown; and the other person is Anat. The strange this is that there is nothing indicating these are female deities. Some like to see the deity with the atef crown as female and the other deity as male. Their flat chests are indicating that we have 2 male deities here.

The taller deity is obviously male because of his flat chest. He is wearing the atef crown flanked with 2 feathers and the solar disk is right on top of the atef crown. He looks styled in Ancient Egyptian way. He’s holding something with his left arm, probably a long staff, like a ruling staff. His right arm is extended and it’s resting on the shoulders of the deity next to him. This deity with the atef crown doesn’t have the traditional Ancient Egyptian beard of Osiris, which has made some speculate this is a female and not a male deity, despite of the flat chest.

The other deity also has a flat chest. He is shorter than the other deity. He is wearing the elongated hat traditionally worn by Baal and the Phoenicians. His rather “simple” hat compared to the sophisticated one worn by the deity next to him, as well his shorter height, has made us believe this is a younger person with a lower position than the other deity. Both of his hands are extended in a way making it obvious he is holding the reins and driving the chariot both of them are on.

This entire scene made us think this is El and Baal = father and son = King of kings and Crown Prince. Some like to call it as Osiris and Horus. While others want to push it a bit further and say this is Isis as a regent and this is Horus. Or as I would call them, this is Neith and the Crown Prince.

Regardless of what is it, it’s clearly an adult ruler (= king or queen) is represented here with a younger person under his care next to him. I’m saying under his care because of the arms of the adult ruler is on the shoulder of the younger person, as a sign of affection and protection at the same time. This is projecting the image of a family, as in family ties link those 2 together: like mother & son or father & son.

These are surely not Anat and Asterath as what the Main Stream History claim they are. If this was the case, then it would be like saying this is Potus and Potus = saying it’s a person standing next to himself. Ridiculous! This is why I’m in the mindset this is El (King of kings) and Baal (Crown Prince).

• Page 1 770 –

>>15364142

(Please read from the start)

Evidence # 15: Megalithic sites.

I’ve already mentioned that I found a pattern when it comes to the Megalithic sites worldwide = wherever there is a Sebetti ruler, there is megalithic construction. This is no theory, this is an observation, a pattern. In all over the world, how many megalithic sites do we have connected to one culture/civilization? = one, two, three or four at most? How many in Ancient Egytpt? In the Taurus mountain range? In the Andean Region? In Mexico?

Have you ever seen a civilization building dozens (in plural) of megalithic sites before? By that I mean a high concentration of megalithic sites in one geographic region? Crazy, right? What if such a place existed and it was kept in the dark on purpose? What if that place is Phoenicia?

What I’m going to show you next is MANY megalithic sites from Phoenicia, which are scattered in Lebanon and Syria. This is not ALL of them, but SOME of them. It’s impossible to know the real and final number of megalithic sites in Phoenicia as some places are unknown, undiscovered and most sites are not even excavated. Most of the information of such places comes from archaeological bulletins and publications as seen in the pictures I’ve attached with this page. I repeat: this is incomplete and the possibility of finding more sites is high. It’s in these same bulletins and much more like them where anons will find some good and easy information about the archaeological excavations in Lebanon specifically. There are many volumes going back decades and they are still publishing new volumes of some of these bulletins.

Of course these are not ALL the sites I’m going to show anons, but those are the ones I’m aware of = I know about. I’ve also visited some of them. I’m going to put them randomly and I don’t have much information on them, since most are not excavated and there is little or no information about them. They are obviously from the same contruction style = the Phoenician style, but no one wants to admit they are Phoenician, not even the Lebanese, because it goes against the narrative pushed forward by the Main Stream History. (((They))) willing to give any explanation to you about these sites, apart that they are constructed by the Phoenicians. Anything will do apart the truth.

I’m going to proceed as I did before when it comes to the pages since I have a lot of photos in some sites to show anons. Also there are some interesting “stuff” apart the megaliths in some sites that caught my attention and I will be sharing the pictures with anons about them. It’s interesting.

There is one HUGE notable common to most sites I’m going to show you. The big blocks are at the bottom and the Romans came and built temples on top of them. In the pictures I’m going to post, always look at the lower blocks. It’s like the Romans used the already existing blocks on the site as a platform to build the new Roman temples on. Some of the big blocks were reused by the Romans as is, while some we broken or cut by the Romans and sections were taken from them. You will understand me better when you see the pictures.

• Page 1 771 –

>>15364161

(Please read from the start)

Site 1: Baalbek, Lebanon.

Baalbek meaning is House of Baal or place of Baal, town of Baal. I have a lot of information about the sanctuary built there by the Romans as I’ve visited the site many times. The Trilithon in the platform of Jupiter’s temple of Baalbek is famous not just being megalithic but the biggest riddle is: how did the stones get up there, at that height/ level?

These 3 blocks in the foundation of the temple of Jupiter are not just big, they are simply HUGE, massive. We believe these are the biggest ever megalithic stones out there among all the megalithic sites in the entire world. But I might be wrong, since I’m no expert in such subjects. The last picture, with this page, is the theory of how these stones were transported from the quarry (location known) to the site. But this doesn’t explain how the stones were lifted and put on THAT height.

Also please take a look at the blocks around the Trilithon: the ones above it and the ones below it. Compare them. Do you see the difference between the stones? This is the difference between the construction phases; as in the Trilithon and what’s below it are older than what is above them (built at another stage by someone else). Some have theorized that the lower levels were built during the reign of the Seleucid king Antiochus IV. I used to think that too, but not anymore, not after coming to this board.

• Page 1 772 –