So if KR was the "actor" from Sandy Hook, was the entire event staged, OR is the Deep State picking off the "actors" who can turn whistleblower to out all their fuckery?
Kamala Harris appeared to contradict Biden, saying Kyle Rittenhouse verdict shows the criminal justice system needs to be more equitable
Vice President Kamala Harris commented on the verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial, suggesting it showed the criminal justice system is not equitable, apparently contradicting President Joe Biden's remarks.
In a tweet Friday evening, the vice president and former prosecutor said: "Today's verdict speaks for itself. I've spent a majority of my career working to make our criminal justice system more equitable. It's clear, there's still a lot more work to do."
While Harris' comments seemed to condemn the outcome of the trial, Biden had stood by the jury's decision earlier Friday.
"I stand by what the jury has concluded. The jury system works and we have to abide by it," Biden told reporters on the White House lawn.
In a written statement that followed, Biden said: "While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken."
"I know that we're not going to heal our country's wounds overnight, but I remain steadfast in my commitment to do everything in my power to ensure that every American is treated equally, with fairness and dignity, under the law," he continued. "I urge everyone to express their views peacefully, consistent with the rule of law. Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy."
Rittenhouse was found not guilty Friday on all five charges brought against him. He was on trial for fatally shooting two men during civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in 2020. His lawyers argued he acted in self-defense.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-appeared-contradict-biden-044356230.html
Interesting that their 'birthday' is listed as Nov 20.
Today…
Where is the pic of the sister sitting behind him at the verdict?
Indiana woman allegedly sold her daughter, 13, to man, 27
FORT WAYNE, Ind. (AP) — An Indiana woman allegedly sold her 13-year-old daughter to a 27-year-old man before she and her husband forced her to marry him and then celebrated the wedding with a party, authorities said.
The girl's mother was charged Thursday in Allen County with child selling where the defendant transfers or receives property for terminating the care of a dependent and neglect of a dependent, The Journal Gazette reported.
The 27-year-old man, Zee Kdee Ya, was also charged Thursday. He faces charges of child solicitation and neglect of a dependent.
Warrants were issued for the arrest of Ya and the girl's mother. Online court records did not list attorneys Friday who could speak on behalf of either of them.
Police got involved when a friend of the girl called Fort Wayne police on Dec. 20, 2020, to say that her friend was being forced to marry an adult that night, according to court documents.
Officers arrived at a party and saw a sign on the wall celebrating the marriage, court documents said. Adults there denied it was a marriage celebration, saying it was “only an engagement between the girl and Zee Kdee Ya,” according to court records.
But when police spoke privately to the girl, she said that seven days prior to the wedding celebration, her parents had signed paperwork in Burmese, arranging the marriage.
Court records allege that Ya gave the girl a gold bracelet, necklace and about $2,000 in cash, which she turned over to her parents. At that point, she was considered married and was moved in with Ya and had to share a bed with him, according to court documents.
When Ya allegedly tried to touch the girl on top of her clothes, she yelled at him to leave her alone, court records state.
He then quoted the Bible to her and told the girl: “I own you now. I can make you do what I want,” according to court documents, which also state that the girl said her parents told her she “needed to have sex with Ya because he was now her husband."
Ya allegedly told a police investigator the party was to celebrate the engagement and wedding. He admitted that the girl had moved in with him after they signed the paperwork but denied they stayed in the same bed, and said that the wedding was stopped by police and the Department of Child Services, according to court documents.
Ya told police he’d given money and gold to the girl and the girl told him she gave the cash to her father, court documents state.
The girl's mother told police her daughter “was only getting engaged and wouldn’t get married until she was 18 years old,” according to the records. She said she and her husband used the $2,000 from Ya to buy food for the party and makeup for their daughter, court documents said.
She allegedly said the girl's father was aware they used the money for the party. But the father, who has not been charged, told police he never received any money and “didn’t know anything about the money given to the victim,” court documents state.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/indiana-woman-allegedly-sold-her-205302465.html
Sen. Elizabeth Warren calls on SEC to investigate Trump SPAC deal with DWAC for possible securities violations
Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Thursday asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate possible securities violations in a planned SPAC deal involving former President Donald Trump’s new social media platform.
Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, in a letter to SEC Chairman Gary Gensler noted recent news reports that Digital World Acquisition Corp., which last month announced plans to merge with Trump’s company, “may have committed securities violations by holding private and undisclosed discussions about the merger as early as May 2021, while omitting this information [SEC) filing and other public statements.”
Warren also wrote, “The reports about DWAC and Trump Media and Technology Group appear to be a textbook example of a SPAC misleading shareholders and the public about materially important
information.”
She said that the omission resulted in “enriching big investors” in DWAC,” including a number of hedge funds, whose shares exploded in value after the merger was announced, “while trapping retail investors in a stock bubble.” At least four hedge funds D.E. Shaw, Lighthouse Investment Partners, ATW Spac Management, and Saba Capital, sold their unrestricted shares after the deal was announced.
Warren noted in the first week of trading following the merger news, DWAC’s shares rose by as much as 1,657%, but eventually fell back from $175 per share to $56.50 per share.
And as of Tuesday, she wrote, the share price was just under $60 “leaving the transaction looking suspiciously like a scheme in which ‘the salesmen behind all of this should be fine, even if those who fall for their sales pitch get screwed,’ ” Warren wrote, quoting a line from a Forbes article entitled, “Trump’s SPAC Is Screwing His Own Supporters While Enriching Wall Street Elites.”
A spokesperson for the SEC said, “We don’t comment on the existence or nonexistence of a possible investigation.”
So-called special purpose acquisition companies such as DWAC are created to raise capital in public equity markets with the goal of purchasing or merging with private firms.
Trump Media & Technology Group last month said it had entered into a merger agreement with DWAC that would end with Trump’s company becoming a publicly listed company, subject to regulatory and stockholder approval.”
Warren’s letter to the SEC cited an Oct. 29 article in The New York Times, which carried the headline, “Trump’s $300 Million SPAC Deal May Have Skirted Securities Laws.”
That article, citing sources, reported that DWAC’s chief Patrick Orlando “had been discussing a deal with Mr. Trump since at least March,” months before shares in that began trading on the Nasdaq in September.
The Times noted that SPACs are not supposed to have mergers planned when at the time of their initial public offerings.
Warren’s letter referred to the Securities Act of 1933, which bars false statements or failing to state a material fact in the sale of a security.
She said that under that law, “SPACs are required to disclose any direct or indirect conversations with potential target companies, protecting both the early investors and retail investors joining at the initial public offering.”
“But DWAC and Trump Media and Technology Group appear to have brazenly flouted these
rules,” Warren wrote.
more
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/18/sen-elizabeth-warren-calls-on-sec-to-investigate-trump-spac-deal.html
She should be removed as the Judge now because that little "recommendation" could be seen as a bribe.
Well, if the team that said they have it all, would release more than 40%, perhaps there would be a major energetic shift.
The positive energy yesterday at the "NOT GUILTY" verdict was amazing.
Then, it's followed up by a bombardment of Fake News reports, interviews with Evil Cabal Puppets, and that positive energy gets drowned out.