I believe that, we were given a mission.
Question: are most anons carrying an intensity that others notice? Ive been told all my life, “you are so intense”! I didnt notice it until it was said multiple times.
Green screen in courtroom:
Did they do this to protect everyone or does he think there was no trial?
If anons get the word to twitter and social media sites the injustice andget the support to defend Chrystal Kizer like we did with Kyle, we can do somethin no BLM or Antifa will do. Right now shes being funded by leftists that bail antifa and BLM out of jail. (Was on the article from msm posyed earlier today). We need to help her somehow. Not a cut and dry case like Kyle but Kenosha DA needs ro be exposed for their corruption.
Theres a lot more research to do on this case.
https://twitter.com/DefNotDarth/status/1462207704911515650?s=20
Long thread on Chrystul, a video or two.Graveley would have Kyle in prison for the rest of life if they won yesterday. This is what they did to Chrystul until the appeals court got involved. She was in prison for close to three years waiting. Graveley has got s thing for 17 year old victims.
https://twitter.com/DefNotDarth/status/1462191952464592902?s=20
Why did the Sheriff need to be pressured to act? Did they know it was going on for a long time and looked the other way? If so, why?
Thats what weve got, criminals in all police and federal agencies tasked with protecting us
Amazing MSNBC publishing a positive piece about Shroeder??? They probably dont wabt to be banned in other trials and kissing up
Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear case of Chrystul Kizer, sex trafficking victim accused of killing abuser
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has agreed to review the case of Chrystul Kizer, a teenage sex trafficking victim who is charged with killing her abuser. The decision marks the next step in a years-long legal battle that could have national repercussions on the way that trafficking victims involved with serious crimes are treated.
He was sexually abusing underage girls. Then, police said, one of them killed him. At the heart of the debate is whether Kizer, now 21, should have access to a law known as the affirmative defense. In June, an appeals court ruled that Kizer should indeed have the chance to present evidence that her crime was a “direct result” of the trafficking she experienced. If a judge, and then a jury, ruled in her favor, Kizer could then be acquitted of some or all the charges against her in the death of Randall Phillip Volar III.
But prosecutors appealed the June ruling, arguing that the affirmative defense law was never intended to provide a complete defense to someone accused of committing a homicide.
Now, the seven justices of Wisconsin’s highest court will decide what they believe the true meaning of the state’s affirmative defense law is, and whether it applies to Kizer.
The case comes at a time when police, prosecutors, judges and lawmakers across the country are re-examining the way trafficking victims are treated in the criminal justice system. People who experience trafficking are likely to be coerced or forced to break the law by their abusers, or may commit crimes in attempts to escape or defend themselves.
The state of Ohio vs. a sex trafficked teenager
Anti-trafficking advocates across the country have pointed to Kizer’s case as an example of where the law should take into consideration the abuse that Kizer experienced.
Kizer is considered a trafficking victim because she was too young to consent to being sold for sex. She was 16 when Volar, 34, began filming his sexual abuse of her, allegedly in exchange for cash, food and gifts. Volar, a White man, was also filming his abuse of multiple other underage Black girls.
Anti-trafficking activists have argued the charges against Kizer should be dropped.
investigation showed thatKenosha police knew about the abuse of these girls for more than three months. They had raided Volar’s home after a drugged 15-year-old girl ran from it, calling 911 to say Volar was going to kill her. Inside, police found Volar’s videos, along with “hundreds” of other child abuse videos.
But Volar remained free, even after the evidence was handed over to prosecutors. Then in June 2018, officers were called back to the house, which had been set on fire. Volar was dead inside, shot twice in the head. His BMW was missing.
They soon arrested Kizer, a 17-year-old living an hour’s drive north in Milwaukee. She was charged as an adult with arson, stealing a vehicle and first-degree intentional homicide, an offense that carries a mandatory life sentence in Wisconsin.
In interviews with The Post, Kizer said she was trying to defend herself because she did not want to comply with Volar’s demands for sex.
Prosecutors say the evidence shows the killing was premeditated, and that Kizer continued contact with Volar after the 34-year-old tried to end their arrangement. Kenosha District Attorney Michael Graveley, who made headlines for his involvement in the Jacob Blake and Kyle Rittenhouse cases, has repeatedly said he believes Kizer’s motive was to steal Volar’s BMW.
Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley, speaking at a news conference Jan. 5, 2021, in Kenosha, Wis., about the Jacob Blake case,has said he believes Chrystul Kizer’s motive was to steal Randall Phillip Volar III's BMW.
Both sides will now submit their written arguments to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and will likely hold oral arguments before the justices in the coming months.
But rather than examining the grim details of the case, they will be debating their interpretations of the state’s affirmative defense law.
The law is similar, but broader than most laws across the country intended to protect trafficking victims involved in crimes. While most states specify which crimes the protection applies to — such as prostitution, drug possession or fraud —Wisconsin’s law does not. It states that trafficking victims have an affirmative defense “for any offense committed as a direct result” of being trafficked
The attorneys have been sparring over a small but significant detail: the spot where the affirmative law was placed into Wisconsin statute by legislators. The law was inserted beneath a statute that describes first-degree intentional homicide charges being reduced to second-degree intentional homicide…..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/09/20/chrystul-kizer-wisconsin-supreme-court-trafficking-murder/
An article i posted on Binger last week said hes been in DAs office for six years, and theytouted he won 13-14 cases, a comment mentioned thats a really small amount of cases to win in 6 years.
Anyway to find out how many cases Binger (and Kraus) tried and lost?
I think Graveley assigned his top two losers in the dept, because they were expendable. The first he named quit, he wanted nothing to do with it, he probably knew it was a poison case. (posted by another anon).
That might be the reason Binger and Kraus tried so hard by obvious cheating, they knew too. But the DAs office is corrupt there so they all cheat most likely.
Thx for posting those, I love rewatching them
Yeah youve got to wonder if they are getting a cut in it. Some anon posted articles on this same situation that women and children were being held against their will, people reported it multiple times but the police only came when the women lit the house on fire. Posted a couple of years ago