Even though Q said there is more good than bad, I have to agree with your post.
4am talking points. Back to impeachment again. Sigh.
There is a major leaker in the DOJ. And only someone with knowledge of the fact that Nunes and Gowdy did not show up for a Friday meeting to "continue discussions on viewing the docs." Nunes said it on Fox. He knew they were going to sent him and Gowdy up, so they didn't go. Sure enough, look at Friday's nights headlines.
Just came across another tidbit. Pic related. Remember, the FBI did not like Justice. FB_ vs DO_.
Anyone else get the feeling RR is still leaking to the press?
If RR is /our guy/, why would Q say he will be forced out? If he has done nothing wrong, no reason to be forced out.
Sorry, not buying it. Too many clues lead to another conclusion. I highly suspect he is leaking to the press. Remember that he won't give to Congress the same info being leaked to the press. Remember Nunes and Gowdy were going to be setup by Friday's news leaks. No one knew they were suppose to go to a secret meeting at the DOJ, until it was leaked they didn't show up. Only top 3 would have that knowledge. And I trust Sessions.
We could debate the finer points all day. But, I believe he is dirty AF. Only time will tell.
That's true, but who receommended RR in the first place. Also, think of Tillerson and McMaster. Early on, I don't think it was clear who all the "actors" were.
The whole Rm thing is just as crooked AF. Everything about it is a set up. I can not get past the fact that Q told us RR threatened to throw the full wieght of his office on the intel cmte for forcing the release of the memo. That was a direct threat to member of the United States Congress. That's not a little thing.
I have a different take on it. They thought that would be the end of Potus. Just like those who "leaked" that tape thought it would. They were wrong. Doesn't make them good guys, but they were not setting out to take over.
There are always 2 different ways to look at the same issue. It's nice to chat with anons that logically state their opinions, rather than throw ego's in the mix. Here is my opinion to your thoughts. The other side of the coin, if you will.
> The thing that still stands out to me is the meeting Trump had with Mueller the day before the SC was created. Claimed he was interviewing Mueller for FBI Director spot, even though he was not eligible.
That meeting could very well have been RR/RM trying to convince Potus to let this investigation play out. That it was in his best interest to have it to show there was no collusion. Potus knew he did nothing wrong, so why not.
Think of it this way…why would RR go with RM to a potential job interview for FB_ Dir?
Now, here's a monkey wrench. What if Potus long terms plans are to declare Obozo presidency null and void. Would that make BHO's apt of RM also null and void? If so, then RM was not at the maximum time limit to serve as Dir. But then, what Happens to Wray.
It gets majorly complicated.
Agreed with Q's need to confuse. However, it was confirmed by the cmte on tv it did happen.
I don't believe either. Gowdy has to finish his time in Congress. He can't just walk away from it. He is involved in several cmte's investigating this corruption. Plus, he has stated publicly he wants to leave DC and go into private practice. I think he was blackmailed and can't get away from DC fast enough.
Welcome to the convo anon. Agreed his lopsided vote makes it easy to believe he is swamp. Only the never-never Trumpers voted against him.
Your argument is hard to disprove because it comes down to the fact of what he is really investigating. Q has led us to believe he is not investigating Potus (which he can't really by law). Your points make me question my belief they are both deep state. What I wouldn't give to know the truth now.
your intent to continue a slide and instigate an argument proves you are a shill. Filtered.