Anonymous ID: 700e3a May 22, 2018, 8:19 a.m. No.1505540   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1505517 (last bread)

 

"have to follow"

 

that's just it. how independent is RM? that's what it boils down to.

 

IF

he gets to decide how to follow evidence

OR

IF

what evidence should be followed

 

AND

 

he follows anything damaging to cabal

 

THEN

 

his allegiance to the cabal is tarnished

 

AND

 

the probability that he's flipped is >0

 

(imo)

Anonymous ID: 700e3a May 22, 2018, 8:28 a.m. No.1505608   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1505544

Q thinks the same - (don't mistake this as a sleepy-posting-shill, ha!) - and if you read through his 20-odd posts mentioning for 'sleep', you'll note a pattern.

Anonymous ID: 700e3a May 22, 2018, 8:37 a.m. No.1505671   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5686

>>1505573

i appreciate your discernment.

 

I was referring to Q 1318:

 

If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.

If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.

 

Q asks us to think logically.

logically, if this reasoning is TRUE, (and he's showing us a converse statement) than the inverse of both must also be true.

 

If RR is (clean), Mueller must also be (clean).

If Mueller is (clean), RR must also be (clean).

 

This is, i believe, intentional on Q's part.

 

use logic, infer from what we're given, extrapolate.

Anonymous ID: 700e3a May 22, 2018, 8:46 a.m. No.1505729   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1505686

 

what part?

 

it's normal logic. Given: IF A, then B.

 

converse: IF B, then A.

inverse: IF NOT A, then NOT B

contrapositive: IF NOT B, then NOT A

Anonymous ID: 700e3a May 22, 2018, 9:41 a.m. No.1506073   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1505902

right on.

 

and to top it all off, we're watching a (recorded/taped) movie. we just need to spread the word so other people can enjoy it with us.