Anonymous ID: 9c67f2 Nov. 22, 2021, 8:45 p.m. No.15061325   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15061188

WHEN do I get to drink my Pelosi-et-all are Convicted champagne that has been taking up space in the fridge for….awhile now?

I am thinking of just drinking it for Thanksgiving and getting another to hold onto.

Anonymous ID: 9c67f2 Nov. 22, 2021, 9:23 p.m. No.15061601   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1644 >>1652

What Would Happen if the PCR Test Were Disproven?

 

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/what-would-happen-if-the-pcr-test

 

We have an IRB Proposal to sequence clinical samples and disprove the bogus PCR tests. All we need now is funding. That's up to you.

 

A blog article from 10/2020 was an early rational voice on False Positives. We are about to suffer badly due to OSHA's testing requirements due to work loss.

 

See: What tests to use, when, why—and why not? Pitfalls of mass testing for COVID-19

The article shows that when the prevalence of a disease is low, the % of positive results that are false explodes:

The prevalence of a disease is how many people are currently infected - a statistic avoided by public health data depots from the beginning.

 

It’s been known, well, forever, in clinical diagnostics that if you screen for a condition, including infections, using tests that have false positives - positive results from patients that do not have the infection - you’ll end up with more false positive results than true positive results when the prevalence is low.

 

Subscribe to Popular Rationalism

By James Lyons-Weiler  ·  Thousands of subscribers

Logic. Reason. Science.