>>15060439 (lb)
>to be honest this anon doesn't really know what to think anymore.
Given enough time, all players reveal their true intentions.
>>15060317 (lb)
>>15060345 (lb)
I don't mean to play dumb. I'm perfectly happy to state the humbly obvious. Can someone give me a QRD on the Forrestal and JFK situation? Papi's been on a JFK trip today (which has me reminiscing about videos and subject matters that a 3 year old shouldn't have the capacity to remember), and I'm getting the impression that Forrestal pieced together something about the official WWII narrative(s), and JFK picked up what he was putting down. Years later, we have "grassy knoll" and an instantiated takeover which resulted in kicking out the "Soviets" in all embassies (that may have had the ability to tell us what was going on when it was happening at that time). Am I fucking this up, or getting somewhere?