They are so so so desperate.
kmao
You're a wannabe rabulist kite!
I know you are but what am I.
No, YOU filter them if YOU don't want to see their bullshit.
YOU don't decide what bullshit OTHERS see.
>Yet
Fuck you, I never said or suggested I will decide, I said quite clearly if YOU don't want to see their bullshit, then YOU can filter them.
Filtering only filters what YOU see and does not affect anyone else you dumb fuck.
He's right, it may be the start of a revolution by and for the people, not the criminal activities of this racist POS.
Go ahead and spend time making one then.
You seem to be experiencing your own psyche, 33 post shill.
Moron, if a person does not want to see bullshit posts from shills, and THEY issue a 'directive' that impacts everyone else, then it is NOT a 'directive' to say that if they don't want to see the bullshit then they can filter.
If you 'sense' a 'direction' in what I posted, that is only because your own mind is already in a directive framing, so you 'see' yourself instead of what is 'ackshually' motivating anon posts.
Did you see the big fat "IF" in the first sentence?
IF you don't want to see, THEN you filter and don't direct what every other anon sees or doesn't see.
Each anon can decide for themselves.
Isn't it something when those who attack voting rights by diluting citizen votes, try to defend their attack by calling it a defensive response against what is itself a defensive response to voting rights attacks.
You just contradicted yourself and proved my post correct.
First you said it was a 'directive'…
Now you're saying it's 'ambiguous'.
If ambiguous, you lacked any information to conclude and post that it was a 'directive'.
Do you even logic, 40 post shill?
Moron, the trust's beneficiaries are not public knowledge.
You would know as an insider.
Jimmy Kimmel is a washed up sexist POS trying to virtue signal his way back to relevancy.
You would know.