Case Law Precedent has already been established to prevent the POTUS or anyone else from forcing the military to get the JAB

Case Law Precedent has already been established to prevent the POTUS or anyone else from forcing the military to get the JAB; although most of them are not aware of this. We need to change that.

“If you have not already been, you are about to be ordered to take a “jab.” I must remind you of your oath and your obedience to any LAWFUL order given you. As to that LAWFUL order… hold it up to the light of one of the civil weapons at your disposal… Precedent Case Law – and hear the words of Judge Sullivan.

As a result of this status, the DoD is in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 1107, Executive Order 13139, and DoD Directive 6200.2. Thus, because the plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits, defendants will not face substantial harm by the imposition of an injunction, the public interest is served, and plaintiffs face irreparable harm, the Court finds that the plaintiffs meet the requirements for a Preliminary Injunction.

The women and men of our armed forces put their lives on the line every day to preserve and safeguard the freedoms that all Americans cherish and enjoy. Absent an informed consent or presidential waiver, the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs.

Doe # 1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119, 134 (2003).

This, Ladies and Gentlemen under Arms is one of the weapons you must learn… and use… to protect yourselves so that you may protect us!”

How can we inform all those in the military of this ruling as reported in the NY Times in 2003?

( https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/us/judge-halts-military-s-required-anthrax-shots.html )?

I have emailed this information to 2 retired flag officers, retired U.S. Army Major General Paul E Vallely and retired U.S. Army Colonel Frank Bragg; in addition to several conservative pundits. Hopefully by tomorrow at this time, I will have succeeded in ripping Joe Biden and the DoD a new asshole.

This information now gives our men and women in the military LEGAL RECOURSE to sue Joe Biden and the Department of Defense for illegal activities against them, as well as reinstate anyone who has been illegally discharged or detained.

https://politicallyincorrectmedia.com/2021/11/21/case-law-precedent-has-already-been-established-to-prevent-the-potus-or-anyone-else-from-forcing-the-military-to-get-the-jab/amp/

Judge Halts Military's Required Anthrax Shots

By Robert Pear

Dec. 23, 2003

A federal district judge ruled Monday that the Defense Department could not compel members of the armed forces to be vaccinated against anthrax without their consent.

The judge, Emmet G. Sullivan, issued a preliminary injunction that prohibits Pentagon officials from inoculating service members without their consent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/us/judge-halts-military-s-required-anthrax-shots.html

Judge orders DoD to stop requiring anthrax shots

Filed Under:

Anthrax

; Public Health

By:

Robert Roos

| Dec 23, 2003

Dec 23, 2003 (CIDRAP News) – Stating that US soldiers should not be used as "guinea pigs for experimental drugs," a federal district judge in Washington, DC, yesterday granted a preliminary injunction against the Department of Defense's (DoD's) mandatory anthrax vaccination program.

US District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan concluded that Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) has never been specifically approved or labeled for use against inhalational anthrax, the main aim of the military vaccination program, as opposed to skin anthrax. Consequently, service members should not be vaccinated without their informed consent or a presidential waiver of the informed-consent requirement, he said.

"This court is persuaded that AVA is an investigational drug and a drug being used for an unapproved purpose," Sullivan wrote.

"The women and men of our armed forces put their lives on the line every day to preserve and safeguard the freedoms that all Americans cherish and enjoy," the judge stated. "Absent an informed consent or presidential waiver, the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs."

See also:

DoD's adverse event information on the anthrax vaccine

http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/event/default.asp

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2003/12/judge-orders-dod-stop-requiring-anthrax-shots

>>15069638

Part 2

AVA is given in six doses over 18 months, with annual boosters thereafter. Close to a million military personnel have received anthrax shots since DoD launched the current immunization program in 1998, according to BioPort Corp., current manufacturer of AVA (now called BioThrax). Hundreds of soldiers have quit the military or sought transfers to other units to avoid the shots, and some have been disciplined or court-martialed for refusing them.

In defending against the lawsuit, DoD officials said there have been 105 serious adverse events among 830,000 anthrax vaccinees, according to Sullivan's ruling. The document says that the vaccine label lists an overall adverse-event rate of 5% to 35% and that six deaths have been blamed on the vaccine. In addition, according to the ruling, the vaccine's risk classification for pregnant women has been raised from category C, meaning risk can't be excluded, to category D, positive evidence of risk.

Plaintiffs seeking to halt the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) include members of the regular military and the National Guard, plus some civilian contract employees of DoD, according to the court ruling. Three of the six plaintiffs have already had anthrax shots.

Sullivan ordered the defendants, who include DoD, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Department of Health and Human Services, to file responses to his ruling by Jan 30, 2004. Little information was available today on DoD's immediate reaction to the injunction. But a New York Times report said the Justice Department was reviewing the decision. The story quoted Pentagon officials as saying it was not clear if DoD will have to stop inoculating military personnel while legal proceedings continue.

The court ruling says that AVA was originally licensed by the National Institutes of Health in 1970. The FDA later took over licensing of drugs and reviewed the safety, effectiveness, and labeling of all approved drugs. In 1985 a panel of experts who reviewed AVA determined that it was "safe, effective and not misbranded," according to the ruling. However, the panel found that the vaccine's efficacy against inhalational anthrax was not well documented, because in the main clinical trial of the vaccine among mill workers handling goat hair, very few cases of inhalational anthrax occurred.

Subsequent events never provided a clear legal justification for using AVA to prevent inhalational anthrax, according to Sullivan's ruling.

In 1995 the Army proposed a plan to expand the vaccine's indications to include protection against inahalation anthrax, he wrote. The following year, the Michigan Department of Public Health, which then manufactured the vaccine, filed an investigational new drug (IND) application with the FDA, seeking permission to conduct clinical trials to support a change in the labeling. "The IND application is still pending and, to date, there is no indication for inhalation anthrax on the label or on the package insert," Sullivan wrote.

However, DoD lawyers argued in the case that the IND application was filed as a result of a "dispute between underlings" and is no longer being pursued, though it is technically still pending.

In 1997 DoD officials sought FDA confirmation that the vaccine was licensed for inhalational disease. In response, the FDA deputy commissioner wrote that the DoD's view that the license indeed covered inhalational anthrax was "not inconsistent with the current label."

However, Sullivan concluded that the FDA "has failed to provide a formal opinion as to AVA's investigational status." Further, no additional studies have supported the vaccine's efficacy for inahalation anthrax, and the label does not list that indication, he wrote. Moreover, sealed documents indicate that the IND application is still pending, and some DoD statements suggest that DoD itself has sometimes viewed AVA as experimental in relation to inhalational anthrax, he added.

"Given all these factors, the Court would be remiss to conclude that the original license included inhalation anthrax," the judge stated. He concluded that the mandatory vaccination program "amounts to arbitrary action."

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2003/12/judge-orders-dod-stop-requiring-anthrax-shots

>>15069644

>>15069638

Part 3

The ruling notes that Congress in 1998 forbade DoD to require troops to take INDs or drugs not approved for the intended use without the troops' informed consent. Congress stipulated that only the president could suspend the consent requirement. The law was a response to concerns that INDs used during the 1991 Gulf War might have caused mysterious illnesses in veterans.

The government argued that requiring informed consent for the anthrax shots would essentially stop the vaccination program for forces in Iraq and in the war on terrorism and could hinder overall military readiness. But the plaintiffs, according to the ruling, responded that if the risk of anthrax attacks was so high, the US State Department and the British and Australian military commands in Iraq would have vaccinated their personnel.

Sullivan said he was "not convinced that requiring the DoD to obtain informed consent will interfere with the smooth functioning of the military." But if that did happen, he wrote, DoD could seek a presidential waiver of the requirement.

Sullivan's ruling does not refer to the recent 17-month study of AVA by the Institute of Medicine. In that study, released in March 2002, experts concluded that the vaccine was "acceptably safe" but called for development of a new vaccine that requires fewer doses and causes fewer reactions. After reviewing the evidence from human and animal studies, the panel said the vaccine is effective against anthrax, including the inhalational form.

DoD's adverse event information on the anthrax vaccine

http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/event/default.asp

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2003/12/judge-orders-dod-stop-requiring-anthrax-shots

WATCH: Science journalist Matt Ridley reveals the little coronavirus 'WRINKLE' in the number 7896

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

What does this number tell us about the possible origins of COVID-19?

Like most people, biologist and science journalist Matt Ridley just wants the truth. When it comes to the origin of COVID-19, that is a tall order. Was it human-made? Did it leak from a laboratory? What is the role of gain-of-function research? Why China, why now?

Ridley's latest book, "Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19," is a scientific quest to answer these questions and more. A year ago, you would have been kicked off Facebook for suggesting COVID originated in a lab. For most of the pandemic, the left practically worshipped Dr. Anthony Fauci. But lately, people have been poking around. And one of the names that appears again and again is Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance and a longtime collaborator and funder of the virus-hunting work at Wuhan Institute of Virology.

If you watched Glenn Beck's special last week, "Crimes or Cover-Up? Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie," you learned some very disturbing things about what our government officials — like Dr. Fauci — were doing around the beginning of the pandemic. On the latest "Glenn Beck Podcast," Glenn sat down with Ridley to review what he and "Viral" co-author Alina Chan found while researching — including a "fascinating little wrinkle" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology called "7896."

]https://www.theblaze.com/shows/glenn-beck-podcast/matt-ridley-covid-origins?utm_source=theblaze-7DayTrendingTest&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Blaze%20PM%20Trending%202021-11-23&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%207%20Day%20Engagement

Crimes or Cover-Up? Exposing the World’s Most Dangerous Lie

Join BlazeTV with promo code FAUCILIED for $25 off: https://blazetv.com/glenn

COVID-19 changed everything. The way we live our lives, how we operate our businesses, how we see each other. And now, the federal government is sinking its tendrils even deeper, threatening the fabric not only of our bodily autonomy, but of the republic. Our American way of life may never be the same. To save it, we must understand the key fundamentals of the pandemic that transfigured our society into the nightmare it is today. What is the COVID-19 origin story? Who are its top players in government and science, pulling the strings? What was their REAL response in the first days of the pandemic? The answers to these questions are frightening. Emails, documents, and federal contracts tell a dark story that is still dominating our lives. It’s time to cast a light on the shocking truth. Because only with the truth can we emerge from the darkness of this “pandemic” and take back the liberty stolen from us. This is Glenn Beck’s most important chalkboard of his life. And the most pivotal time in yours.

This special would not have been possible without the careful research of fellow truth seeker and American patriot Charles Rixey. Check out his work for more on Fauci’s Covid coverup and much more. https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/

Disclaimer: The content of this clip does not provide medical advice. Please seek the advice of local health officials for any COVID-19 and/or COVID vaccine related questions & concerns