>>98

I agree with Turley's analysis in the article Q cited.

I also agree with much of Turley's opinion published in The Hill today: FBI source in Russia probe raises alarms over political surveillance thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/388785-FBI-source-in-Russia-probe-raises-alarms-over-political-surveillance

Turley, a frequent CNN analyst, can also be very wrong about Trump and his opponents. March 17, 2017

"However, there has been a truly shocking lack of discipline among high-ranking Trump staffers in their public comments, including comments that have undermined the immigration orders. A good example of that ongoing problem is the suggestion that British intelligence surveilled Trump for Obama. This allegation had no place in a White House briefing and led to a reported embarrassing apology from the Administration to the British and a promise not to repeat it. It appears that there was no James Bond contract to surveil and the Administration is again shaken not stirred scripted."

jonathanturley.org/2017/03/17/shaken-not-scripted-spicer-repeats-allegation-that-british-intelligence-spied-on-trump-for-obama-administration-apologizes/