Did Israel Kill The Kennedys?

Just after midnight of June 6, 1968, Senator Robert Kennedy was assassinated in a backroom of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. He had just been celebrating his victory at the California primaries, which made him the most likely Democratic nominee for the presidential election. His popularity was so great that Richard Nixon, on the Republican side, stood little chance. At the age of 43, Robert would have become the youngest American president ever, after being the youngest Attorney General in his brother's government. His death opened the way for Nixon, who could finally become president eight years after having been defeated by John F. Kennedy in 1960.

John had been assassinated four and a half years before Robert. Had he survived, he would certainly have been president until 1968. Instead, his vice-president Lyndon Johnson took over the White House in 1963, and became so unpopular that he retired in 1968. Interestingly, Johnson became president the very day of John's death, and ended his term a few months after Robert's death. He was in power at the time of both investigations.

And both investigations are widely regarded as cover-ups. In both cases, the official conclusion is rife with contradictions. We are going to sum them up here. But we will do more: we will show that the key to solving both cases resides in the link between them. And we will solve them beyond a reasonable doubt.

As Lance deHaven-Smith has remarked in Conspiracy Theory in America:

"It is seldom considered that the Kennedy assassinations might have been serial murders. In fact, in speaking about the murders, Americans rarely use the plural, 'Kennedy assassinations'. […] Clearly, this quirk in the Kennedy assassination(s) lexicon reflects an unconscious effort by journalists, politicians, and millions of ordinary Americans to avoid thinking about the two assassinations together, despite the fact that the victims are connected in countless ways."[1]

John and Robert were bound by an unshakable loyalty. Kennedy biographers have stressed the absolute dedication of Robert to his elder brother. Robert had successfully managed John's campaign for the Senate in 1952, then his presidential campaign in 1960. John made him not only his Attorney General, but also his most trusted adviser, even on matters of Foreign or Military affairs. What John appreciated most in Robert was his sense of justice and the rectitude of his moral judgment. It is Robert, for example, who encouraged John to fully endorse the cause of the Blacks' civil rights movement[2].

https://www.sott.net/article/413239-Did-Israel-Kill-The-Kennedys

Part 1

>>15074682

Did Sirhan Bishara Sirhan really kill Robert Kennedy?

If we trust official statements and mainstream news, the assassination of Robert Kennedy is an open-and-shut case. The identity of the killer suffers no discussion, since he was arrested on the spot, with the smoking gun in his hand. In reality, ballistic and forensic evidence show that none of Sirhan's bullets hit Kennedy.

According to the autopsy report of Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner Thomas Noguchi, Robert Kennedy died of a gunshot wound to the brain, fired from behind the right ear at point blank range, following an upward angle. Nogushi restated his conclusion in his 1983 memoirs, Coroner. Yet the sworn testimony of twelve shooting witnesses established that Robert had never turned his back on Sirhan and that Sirhan was five to six feet away from his target when he fired.

Tallying all the bullet impacts in the pantry, and those that wounded five people around Kennedy, it has been estimated that at least twelve bullets were fired, while Sirhan's gun carried only eight. On April 23, 2011, attorneys William Pepper and his associate, Laurie Dusek, gathered all this evidence and more in a 58-page file submitted to the Court of California, asking that Sirhan's case be reopened. They documented major irregularities in the 1968 trial, including the fact that the bullet tested in laboratory to be compared to the the one extracted from Robert's brain had not been shot by Sirhan's revolver, but by another gun, with a different serial number; thus, instead of incriminating Sirhan, the ballistic test in fact proved him innocent. Pepper has also provided a computer analysis of audio recordings during the shooting, made by engineer Philip Van Praag in 2008, which confirms that two guns are heard. [13]

The presence of a second shooter was signaled by several witnesses and reported on the same day by a few news media. There are strong suspicions that the second shooter was Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard hired for the evening, who was stuck behind Kennedy at the moment of the shooting, and seen with his pistol drawn by several witnesses. One of them, Don Schulman, positively saw him fire. Cesar was never investigated, even though he did not conceal his hatred for the Kennedys, who according to his recorded statement, had "sold the country down the road to the commies."[14]

Even if we assume that Sirhan did kill Robert Kennedy, a second aspect of the case raises question: according to several witnesses, Sirhan seemed to be in a state of trance during the shooting. More importantly, Sirhan has always claimed, and continues to claim, that he has never had any recollection of his act:

"I was told by my attorney that I shot and killed Senator Robert F. Kennedy and that to deny this would be completely futile, [but] I had and continue to have no memory of the shooting of Senator Kennedy."

He also claims to have no memory of "many things and incidents which took place in the weeks leading up to the shooting."[15] Some repetitive lines written of a notebook found in Sirhan's bedroom, which Sirhan recognizes as his own handwriting but does not remember writing, are reminiscent of automatic writing.[16]

Psychiatric expertise, including lie-detector tests, have confirmed that Sirhan's amnesia is not faked. In 2008, Harvard University professor Daniel Brown, a noted expert in hypnosis and trauma memory loss, interviewed Sirhan for a total of 60 hours, and concluded that Sirhan, whom he classifies in the category of "high hypnotizables," acted unvoluntarily under the effect of hypnotic suggestion: "His firing of the gun was neither under his voluntary control, nor done with conscious knowledge, but is likely a product of automatic hypnotic behavior and coercive control."[17]

https://www.sott.net/article/413239-Did-Israel-Kill-The-Kennedys

Part 2

>>15074699

The "host committee" inviting Kennedy was chaired by another influential figure of the wealthy Jewish community in Dallas: advertising executive and PR man Sam Bloom. According to former British Intelligence Officer Colonel John Hughes-Wilson, it was Bloom who suggested to the Police "that they move the alleged assassin [Oswald] from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsmen a good story and pictures."Oswald was shot by Ruby during this transfer." Hughes-Wilson adds that,"when the police later searched Ruby's home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom's name, address and telephone number on it."[39]

After the Dallas tragedy, Israel's sayanim were also busy fabricating the official lie. Apart from its chairman Earl Warren, chosen for his figurative role as Chief Justice, all key people in the investigative Commission were either personal enemies of Kennedy - like Allen Dulles, the CIA director fired by Kennedy in 1961 - or ardent Zionists. The man who played the key role in fabricating the government lie purveyed by the Warren Commission was Arlen Specter, the inventor of what came to be called the "magic bullet" theory: a single bullet supposed to have caused seven wounds to Kennedy and John Connally sitting before him in the limousine, and later found in pristine condition on a gurney in Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. Specter, who with an ironic touch of chutzpah titled his autobiography Passion for Truth, was the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, and, at his death in 2012, was mourned by the Israeli government as "an unswerving defender of the Jewish State," and by AIPAC, as "a leading architect of the congressional bond between our country and Israel."[40]

So, at all stages of the plot, we find a Zionist cabal including business men, politicians and Irgun-connected gangsters, not forgetting media executives, all devoted to Israel.

John John had long been portrayed as a superficial, spoiled and harmless young man. But that image was as misleading as young Hamlet's in Shakespeare's play. John had serious interest in mind, and, at age 39, he was just entering politics. In 1995 he founded George magazine, which seemed harmless until it began to take an interest in political assassinations. In March 1997, George published a 13-page article by the mother of Yigal Amir, the convicted assassin of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. The article was supporting the thesis of a conspiracy by the Israeli far-right. So JFK Jr. was eliminated while following in the footsteps of his father, entering politics through the door of journalism and taking an interest in the crimes of the Israeli deep state. Canadian-Israeli journalist Barry Chamish believes John Kennedy Jr. was assassinated precisely for that.[56]

The nonsensical notion of a mysterious curse on the Kennedy family is an obvious smoke screen. The unsolved murders of JFK and his two legitimate heirs - his younger brother and his only son - require a more rational explanation. The sense that the official stories about their deaths amount to a huge cover-up is obsessing the American psyche, a bit like a repressed family secret affecting the whole personality from a subconscious level.

President John Kennedy and his brother are heroic, almost Christ-like figures, in the heart of a growing community of citizens who have become aware of the disastrous longtime effect of their assassinations. Only when the American public at large come to grips with the truth of their deaths and honor their legacy and sacrifice will America have a chance to be redeemed and be great again.

Part 3

End

Biden Is Giving 1/3 of Oil Reserves He's Releasing to China and India

The Biden administration is releasing 50 million barrels of oil from the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve to lower gas prices.

Because, they say, we cannot be vulnerable to volatile energy supplies.

There’s more to the story.

First, not all of those barrels are going to U.S. consumers. A total of 18 million are expected to be sold to China and India, according to Fox Business.

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm indicated Tuesday that the congressionally-approved sale of those 18 million barrels will help drive down U.S. oil prices, presumably by offsetting international oil shortages.

OPEC nations like Saudi Arabia and Russia have refused to loosen oil supplies, which has driven up prices.

Other nations tapping their oil reserves include China, the U.K., Japan, India and South Korea, Fox Business reported.

Secondly, according to Granholm, a volatile energy supply does not mean we should simply reduce our dependence on nations of questionable loyalty like those in the OPEC cartel.

Nope. While that’s important, volatility includes relying on petroleum itself, Granholm said Tuesday.

We need to reduce volatility through green energy — by having electric cars and windmills and stuff.

“We’ve got to stop relying on one source of energy, especially from volatile sources,” she said.

“So we have a short-term issue and we have a long-term issue. Relying upon volatile sources or relying upon fuel from countries that may not have our best interests at heart hurts the American people in the long and in the short run.

“So it’s why we’re working faster than ever to diversify our energy to add more clean energy. It’s why the president’s vision of building out clean energy sources like solar and wind and hydropower and geothermal and advanced nuclear — that is the answer, that is the best strategy long-term to protect American consumers from these energy price shocks.”

Granholm cited the recently passed infrastructure bill as a means of speeding up development to bring us more of those wonderful suspensions of the laws of physics and economics, electric cars.

Of course, the Biden administration dares not talk about how former President Donald Trump achieved something unheard of for decades: American energy independence.

Which makes the whole idea of needing to tap into the SPR absurd.

While there is debate over the impact of President Joe Biden’s cancellation of the Keystone Pipeline — one of his first acts in office — markets, which often react to perceptions, presumably took it as a signal of coming shortages.

And consumers, while probably not experts on international oil markets, can come to their own conclusions about Biden’s energy policy every time they fill up their cars.

https://www.westernjournal.com/biden-giving-1-3-oil-reserves-releasing-china-india/

Maryland sues Monsanto, alleging harm caused by toxic PCB chemicals

Delaware filed a similar lawsuit in September.

A lawsuit was filed by Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh on Tuesday against Monsanto, alleging that the agrichemical company continued manufacturing toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) chemicals despite knowing they harmed the environment.

"Despite knowing as early as 1937 that PCBs were toxic to humans and animals and that PCBs could escape into and contaminate the environment, Monsanto manufactured and sold PCBs continuously until they were finally banned under federal law," according to the lawsuit.

"Even when Monsanto had overwhelming evidence of the hazards that PCBs create, Monsanto continued to produce and sell these toxic chemicals throughout the country, including in the State of Maryland," the lawsuit continued. "Monsanto's own internal documents show that it was not interested in protecting people or the environment. Rather, its only concern was in protecting its balance sheet."

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) explains that PCBs were banned by federal law in 1979. According to the lawsuit, Monsanto used them until 1977.

The lawsuit says that Monsanto used PCBs "in a broad array of products such as electrical equipment, lighting ballasts, paint, and caulking."

"Between 1935 and 1977, Monsanto was the only company in the United States to manufacture PCBs for widespread commercial use," the lawsuit claims.

The state attorney general also filed the lawsuit against chemicals manufacturer Solutia and pharmaceutical and biotechnical company Pharmacia, which merged with Pfizer in 2003, alleging that Maryland's rivers and land are still polluted with PCBs. Delaware also filed a similar lawsuit in September, The Baltimore Sun reported.

"According to water quality data from 2018, approximately 968 square miles of the State's estuarine waters are impaired by PCB contamination. In addition, approximately 262 miles of Maryland's rivers and streams, and approximately 3,147 acres of the State's lakes and reservoirs, are similarly impaired," the lawsuit said.

"Monsanto's PCBs have caused harm to aquatic, marine, and avian species, and pose ongoing risks to the health of Maryland's residents."

PCBs are carcinogens for animals and research also suggests they probably cause cancer in humans, according to the EPA.

"Monsanto voluntarily ceased its lawful manufacturing of PCBs more than 40 years ago, and never manufactured, used, or disposed of PCBs into Maryland's lands or waters," Bayer AG, the German pharmaceuticals company that acquired Monsanto in 2018, said in a statement, according to The Hill.

"Where it has been determined that those cleanups are necessary, federal, and state authorities employ an effective system to identify dischargers and allocate clean-up responsibilities. Litigation of the sort brought by the state risks undermining these efforts," Bayer added.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/maryland-sues-monsanto-causing-harm-toxic-pcb-chemicals

64 pages

https://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/news%20documents/112321_Maryland_v_Monsanto.pdf

https://twitter.com/Margarita150264/status/1462925678559432708

FCPS Reinstates Two Books, Reaffirming Commitment to Supporting Diversity in Literature

Two books that were subject to a formal challenge have been deemed appropriate for high school readers following a two-month review process and will be reinstated to Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) libraries.

The decision reaffirms FCPS’ ongoing commitment to provide diverse reading materials that reflect our student population, allowing every child an opportunity to see themselves reflected in literary characters. Both reviews concluded that the books were valuable in their potential to reach marginalized youth who may struggle to find relatable literary characters that reflect their personal journeys.

“Gender Queer: A Memoir” by Maia Kobabe and “Lawn Boy” by Jonathan Evison had been temporarily removed from FCPS libraries serving high schools following a challenge in September. The highly-regarded and award-winning books were questioned due to content said to be of an explicit sexual nature, and claims that they referenced pedophilia.

Per FCPS Regulation 3009

, on receipt of the formal complaint, two committees of school administrators, librarians, parents, and students were formed to consider whether the two books were suitable (as optional independent reading material) for high school students. Both books were temporarily withdrawn from FCPS library shelves during the review process.

After deliberate and lengthy discussions on the potential merits and concerns of the book as a literary work, and the potential merits and concerns associated with retaining or removing access to the book from students using school libraries, the committees unanimously recommended that the books should remain available. The final decision to reinstate them was made by the assistant superintendent, Instructional Services Department, per the process outlined in the regulation.

The committee noted the following merits of “Lawn Boy,” which appears in the catalogue of 11 FCPS high schools:

The book is an accessible examination of race, class, socio-economic struggle, and sexual identity. It paints a portrait of the substantial obstacles faced by those who are marginalized by society. It is an uplifting and humanizing depiction of navigating through setbacks with resiliency to reach goals and will resonate with students.

The themes of this book are affirming for students who will recognize that they are not alone as they experience similar systemic challenges and societal prejudices.

The book has literary value as a narrative representing the perspective of a significant portion of students in Fairfax County Public Schools with a variety of backgrounds.

There is no pedophilia present in the book.

The committee noted the following merits of “Gender Queer,” which appears in the catalogue of seven high schools:

The book is a well-written, scientifically based narrative of one person’s journey with gender identity that contains information and perspective that is not widely represented. This depiction includes the difficulties nonbinary and asexual individuals may face. The book has literary value in its structure, voice, and themes and has won literary awards.

Students with a related experience will feel affirmed and others can gain understanding and empathy.

The resources referenced in the book provide access to additional, reliable information.

The book neither depicts nor describes pedophilia.

Klimenko accepted the committees’ recommendation, and today, FCPS announced the decision that will see the books return to shelves. This decision holds, pending any further appeal.

https://www.fcps.edu/news/fcps-reinstates-two-books-reaffirming-commitment-supporting-diversity-literature

Child sexual grooming reinstated

Bernard Kerik Warns Leftists on J-6 Committee He Has OVERWHELMING Evidence of Fraud in 2020 Election – “I Think the American People Should Get to See That”

Bernard Kerik joined Carl Higbie on Greg Kelly Reports on Wednesday night. This was after the J-6 Committee subpoenaed him to testify before their sham investigation.

Kerik was accused by the geniuses on the committee of attending a meeting on Jan. 5th in Washington DC the night before the president’s speech at the Ellipse in Washington DC. This was a lie. Kerik set the record straight tonight.

Bernard Kerik told Carl Higbie what the committee of angry leftists can expect if he testifies before Liz Cheney’s pals.

Bernard Kerik: I can tell you I am one of a small group of people who was working for the legal team under the supervision of Rudy Giuliani that can positively, 1,000% say there was substantial irregularities and there was overwhelming fraud, election fraud and voter fraud. We captured it. We gathered it. We talked to witnesses. We did affidavits… The bottom line is many of the things we were investigating since, over the last 11 months have come to fruition in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan. So, those were the things we were investigating. And I think the American people should get to see that.

Carl Higbie: … So, you’re saying now that you have things in your possession that they might get, that’s going to show all the things that wasn’t shown in court that we don’t have access to right now?

Bernard Kerik: That’s right. Many of the things that didn’t go into court, we only had 6-8 weeks to conduct investigations in six different states. It’s impossible… There are still things coming out today and many of those things were things that we were looking at back 10 months ago.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/must-see-video-bernard-kerik-warns-leftists-j-6-committee-overwhelming-evidence-fraud-2020-election-think-american-people-get-see/

Government nearly loses vote on federal corruption commission motion after MP crosses floor

The government lost the vote but stopped the motion because of a COVID-19 technicality

The Coalition has narrowly avoided embarrassment in parliament, managing to stop a crossbench attempt to bring on debate about a national anti-corruption commission.

Independent MP Helen Haines tried to interrupt the usual business to force a debate on her federal integrity commission bill, arguing the Coalition had been dragging its feet for three years and had not introduced its own model.

Tasmanian Liberal MP Bridget Archer broke away from the government and backed Dr Haines' motion, which was supported by Labor and other crossbenchers.

The vote resulted in a vote of 66 MPs for the motion and 64 against — but a COVID-19 technicality meant the motion did not pass.

It needed an absolute majority — or 76 votes — to get through, but with a number of MPs not in parliament because of COVID restrictions, that was a larger task than usual.

After a number of minutes working out whether the government had in fact lost the vote, independent MP Bob Katter said what many MPs were thinking: "Clearly, a lot of us are very confused."

It took a few minutes more and another vote to confirm that, despite having more votes, Dr Haines's motion was not successful.

"We were prevented by an undemocratic technicality," she said.

"The Prime Minister and the government are standing in the way now of not only the will of the people, but the will of the parliament.

"This is an extraordinary moment, I think, in the House of Representatives.

"Today you saw, I think, the absolute lioness of the 46th parliament and that woman is the member for Bass, Bridget Archer."

Before the vote Ms Archer had risen to second Dr Haines's motion, saying it was a difficult decision to break away from government ranks to bring on the debate.

"Everyone in this House, I think without exception, thinks that we need a robust federal integrity commission, that people should have trust and confidence in us, in the people that they elect, the people they send here," she said.

"The problem is that the politics has wrapped it up so tight that we're not progressing.

"There is a place for politics, there's a place for the partisan pointscoring, but on something as important as trusting confidence in elected officials, that's not it."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-25/federal-iac-bill-vote-parliament-helen-haines/100649316

Australian Gov is a complete circus

Extra-Terrestrial Warfare by Robert Suggs, June 1965, Combat Operations Research Group

“The United States may be called upon to wage extra-terrestrial warfare within the next two to three decades. This paper explores the implications of this requirement for the US Army and proposes a program of studies that will enable the Army to meet this requirement.” – Abstract

This document appeared on eBay, and had no information other than the title and a price tag of $1,000,000.

So, The Black Vault chased it through FOIA. It was received, and is now archived below, in full.

Document Archive

Extra-Terrestrial Warfare by Robert Suggs, June 1965, Combat Operations Research Group [19 Pages, 3.2MB]

https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/army/CORG-SP-213.pdf

https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/extra-terrestrial-warfare-by-robert-suggs-june-1965-combat-operations-research-group/

Gaddafi’s son blocked from Libya election

Libya’s election commission has disqualified 25 of the 98 candidates running for president, including Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, son of the leader whose 2011 overthrow plunged the North African country into a decade-long civil war.

Gaddafi had announced his candidacy on November 14 and looked like one of the front-runners in the contest, scheduled for December 24. On Wednesday, however, the election commission ruled him ineligible. It is a preliminary decision and can be appealed in court.

A military prosecutor in Tripoli had urged the commission to disqualify Gaddafi on grounds of his 2015 conviction in absentia for war crimes related to the 2011 insurrection that overthrew his father. Muammar Gaddafi had ruled Libya for over 40 years before he was ousted and killed by NATO-backed rebels.

Saif al-Islam was the chosen candidate of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya, a group of his father’s loyalists formally established in 2016. He also has a pending arrest warrant on behalf of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

Gaddafi reacted to the decision by pointing out that General Khalifa Haftar has two criminal convictions – a 1987 court-martial over his surrender to Chad, and a 1993 civilian conviction for plotting to overthrow the government – yet he has not been disqualified from running.

Haftar, who commands the armed forces of the Tobruk-based government that controls eastern Libya, was also accused by critics of holding a US citizenship and therefore ineligible. Meanwhile, the interim prime minister of the Tripoli-based national unity government, Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, had promised not to run for president prior to taking on the role, and has refused to resign three months before the election, as required by the controversial election rules.

The UN Security Council on Wednesday issued a statement stressing the importance of the election for the peace and reconciliation in Libya and urged all parties to respect the rights of their political opponents “before, during and after” the vote.

The Geneva-based UN special envoy for Libya, Slovak diplomat Ján Kubiš, abruptly resigned on Tuesday for reasons not yet revealed, but will remain in the post until Secretary-General António Guterres appoints a replacement.

https://www.rt.com/news/541248-gaddafi-libya-election-disqualified/